广告
加载中

奶不如水贵?现代牧业“过冬”:两年累亏25亿 3年换2任董事长

王亚静 2026-06-16 18:16
王亚静 2026/06/16 18:16

邦小白快读

EN
全文速览

这篇文章核心披露了国内原料奶行业进入下行周期后,头部牧场现代牧业的经营困局与自救动作,核心干货如下:

1. 行业整体现状:2021年起国内原料奶供大于求,2025年原料奶均价低至3.06元/公斤,价格甚至低于普通矿泉水,行业亏损面一度飙升至90%以上,当前产能过剩仍未完全出清,牛群数量下降但单产提升,总产量仍微增。

2. 现代牧业的经营困境:2024-2025年两年累计亏损25.46亿元,亏光此前四年积累的全部利润,截至2025年末,有息负债高达192.6亿元,短期债务71.4亿元,流动资金不足70亿元,无法覆盖短债,资金链严重承压,且3年更换2任董事长,管理层持续动荡。

3. 自救动作:现代牧业收购整合大股东蒙牛旗下的中国圣牧,试图获取高端奶源扩大规模,但中国圣牧本身也处于亏损状态,这场整合的前景并不明朗。

本文披露了当前国内原奶行业的消费趋势与上游布局动向,对乳企品牌商的经营决策有较高参考价值,核心干货如下:

1. 消费趋势变化:当前国内整体喝奶需求降低,高端奶需求疲软,消费者不愿意为高端奶源概念支付溢价,即便是中国圣牧的“沙漠有机”高端奶源,也面临营收下滑、亏损持续扩大的困境。

2. 行业成本变化:原奶价格持续下行,饲料成本也出现下滑,上游原料成本降低,给下游品牌商带来了成本端的红利,但需求端整体疲软,价格竞争会更加激烈。

3. 上游布局参考:当前行业产能过剩,头部乳企已经开始推动旗下牧场整合,提升行业集中度,品牌商可以参考这种整合路径,同时需要警惕下行周期并购亏损标的的整合风险,避免反而拖累自身业绩。

本文梳理了原奶行业下行周期的现状与变化,给乳业相关卖家整理了当前的风险与机会,核心干货如下:

1. 风险提示:2021年原奶行业进入下行周期,供大于求导致价格持续下跌,行业亏损面一度超过90%,即便头部牧场也出现巨额亏损,重资产运营的牧场资金链紧绷,卖家需要警惕需求疲软带来的价格竞争风险,以及重资产扩张带来的资金链断裂风险。

2. 机会方向:当前行业正在加速产能出清,头部企业加速整合奶源,行业集中度快速提升,中小从业者可以选择绑定头部乳企的产业链,共享整合后的市场红利,也可以寻求被头部企业整合的机会,降低自身经营风险。

3. 可参考的应对措施:头部牧场当前通过淘汰低产牛、缩减资本开支来节流降本,从业者可以参考这类方式,优化自身产能,控制成本度过周期。

本文分析了原奶行业下行周期的需求变化与行业格局,给上游牧场、乳制品生产工厂提供了诸多参考,核心干货如下:

1. 产品生产与设计需求变化:当前消费者对奶价敏感度提升,高端概念的溢价空间被压缩,消费者不愿意为高端奶源买单,生产端需要调整产品结构,不要盲目扩张高端产能,优先控制生产成本。

2. 商业机会梳理:行业处于产能出清阶段,头部企业加速整合奶源,拥有成本优势、高产奶牛资源的牧场/工厂会获得更多整合机会;对下游乳制品工厂来说,原奶价格下跌带来原材料成本红利,可以借机优化产品定价,抢占大众市场份额。

3. 转型启示:下行周期要控制负债规模,合理缩减非必要资本开支,避免盲目扩张规模,优先通过淘汰低产低效产能实现降本增效,保证现金流安全,应对行业周期。

本文梳理了原奶行业的最新发展趋势与头部玩家的核心痛点,给乳业产业链服务商提供了业务方向参考,核心干货如下:

1. 行业发展趋势:当前原奶行业进入深度下行调整期,产能加速出清,行业浓度逐步提升,头部乳企推动旗下牧场整合并购的动作频繁,蒙牛推动现代牧业整合中国圣牧就是典型案例,未来行业整合会持续推进。

2. 客户核心痛点:当前头部牧场普遍面临巨额亏损、资金链紧张、高端奶需求不足、并购整合后管理难度大的问题,中小牧场更是多数处于亏损状态,对降本、资金、管理的需求强烈。

3. 业务方向参考:服务商可以针对性开发相关解决方案,比如牧场产能优化服务、低成本融资服务、并购整合管理咨询服务、高端奶源营销推广服务,帮助企业应对需求疲软的问题,解决资金和管理层面的核心痛点。

本文披露的原奶行业现状,给乳制品相关平台商指明了行业需求与运营方向,核心干货如下:

1. 行业对平台的核心需求:当前原奶供大于求,大量牧场存在产能过剩、销售渠道不足的问题,需要平台对接下游B端、C端客户;同时多数牧场资金链紧张,需要平台提供供应链金融等配套服务解决周转问题。

2. 风向规避提示:当前行业整体处于亏损状态,需求持续疲软,平台布局上游乳业相关业务时,需要注意控制风险,避免接入过多高负债、持续亏损的标的,影响平台自身的经营健康。

3. 招商运营机会:行业整合加速后,头部整合后的奶源企业有强烈的拓渠需求,平台可以针对性开展招商,推出高端原奶专区对接细分需求,还可以推出原奶价格指数服务,完善行业定价透明度,吸引更多客户接入平台。

本文提供了原奶行业下行周期的最新一手案例与产业动向,对乳业产业研究者有较高的研究参考价值,核心干货如下:

1. 产业最新动向:当前国内原奶行业进入深度下行周期,供大于求导致原奶价格跌破普通矿泉水价格,行业亏损面居高不下,产能过剩尚未完全出清,龙头乳企蒙牛已经推动旗下两大牧场现代牧业与中国圣牧整合,开启了头部奶源企业的整合潮,未来行业集中度会快速提升。

2. 行业新问题:下行周期中,即便是高端有机奶源也面临需求不足、亏损扩大的问题,头部企业整合亏损标的实现自救的模式能否跑通尚无定论,同时头部牧场频繁更换管理层,对企业长期战略执行的影响也值得深入探讨。

3. 可研究方向:可以围绕龙头乳企纵向整合上游奶源的商业模式效果、下行周期牧场降本增效与并购整合的策略有效性、行业产能出清的节奏与后续价格走势等方向展开研究。

返回默认

声明:快读内容全程由AI生成,请注意甄别信息。如您发现问题,请发送邮件至 run@ebrun.com 。

我是 品牌商 卖家 工厂 服务商 平台商 研究者 帮我再读一遍。

Quick Summary

This article details the operational challenges and turnaround efforts of China Modern Dairy, a leading domestic dairy farm operator, after the country’s raw milk industry entered a downcycle. Key takeaways are as follows:

1. Current industry status: China’s raw milk market has been oversupplied since 2021. The average price dropped to just 3.06 yuan per kilogram in 2025 – lower than the price of ordinary bottled mineral water. Industry-wide losses once exceeded 90% of all market participants. While oversupply has not been fully resolved, total output continues to grow modestly: herd size has declined, but yield per cow has increased, offsetting the drop.

2. Modern Dairy’s operational crisis: The company posted a cumulative loss of 2.546 billion yuan over 2024 and 2025, erasing all profits it accumulated over the previous four years. As of the end of 2025, it held 19.26 billion yuan in interest-bearing debt, including 7.14 billion yuan in short-term obligations. With only less than 7 billion yuan in working capital, it cannot cover its near-term debt, putting severe pressure on its cash flow. The company has also seen management instability, with two chairmen replaced over three years.

3. Turnaround efforts: Modern Dairy is acquiring and integrating China Shengmu, another raw milk producer owned by its majority shareholder Mengniu, in a bid to expand its scale of high-end milk sources. However, China Shengmu is also unprofitable, leaving the outlook of this integration highly uncertain.

This article outlines current consumer trends and upstream industry developments in China’s raw milk market, offering actionable insights for dairy brand decision-making. Key takeaways are as follows:

1. Shifting consumer trends: Overall domestic dairy demand is declining, and demand for high-end milk has weakened. Consumers are no longer willing to pay a premium for "premium milk source" branding. Even China Shengmu, known for its "desert organic" high-end source, is facing falling revenue and widening losses.

2. Changing cost dynamics: Sustained declines in raw milk prices, paired with falling feed costs, have lowered upstream input costs, creating a cost tailwind for downstream brands. However, weak overall demand will intensify price competition in the market.

3. Implications for upstream strategy: Against a backdrop of industry-wide overcapacity, leading dairy companies have already begun consolidating their dairy farm assets to raise industry concentration. Brands can follow this consolidation path, but should be wary of integration risks associated with acquiring loss-making assets during a downcycle, which can drag down their own performance.

This article summarizes the current state and shifts of China’s raw milk industry during its downcycle, outlining key risks and opportunities for dairy-related sellers. Key takeaways are as follows:

1. Risk alerts: The raw milk industry entered its downcycle in 2021, and oversupply has driven persistent price declines, with more than 90% of operators posting losses at one point. Even leading dairy farms are facing massive losses, and heavy asset-reliant operations are facing extreme cash flow pressure. Sellers should guard against price competition risks from weak demand, as well as the risk of cash chain collapse from aggressive heavy-asset expansion.

2. Opportunity outlook: The industry is currently accelerating capacity exit, with leading players rapidly consolidating milk sources and concentration rising quickly. Small and medium-sized industry players can choose to tie themselves to the industrial chain of leading dairy companies to share the market benefits of consolidation, or seek to be acquired by leading players to reduce their own operational risk.

3. Actionable coping strategies: Leading dairy farms are currently cutting costs by culling low-yield cows and reducing capital expenditure. Industry players can adopt similar measures to optimize capacity and control costs to weather the downcycle.

This article analyzes demand shifts and industry structure changes during the raw milk downcycle, offering insights for upstream dairy farms and downstream dairy processing plants. Key takeaways are as follows:

1. Shifts in production and product design needs: Consumers have become more sensitive to milk prices, eroding the premium for "high-end" branding, as they are no longer willing to pay more for premium milk source claims. Producers should adjust their product mix, avoid blindly expanding high-end production capacity, and prioritize controlling production costs.

2. Business opportunities: As the industry goes through capacity exit and leading players accelerate milk source consolidation, farms and processing plants with cost advantages and high-yield cow resources will see more acquisition and integration opportunities. For downstream dairy processors, falling raw milk prices create an input cost tailwind, which they can leverage to adjust pricing and gain market share in the mass market segment.

3. Lessons for transformation: During a downcycle, companies should control debt levels, reasonably scale back non-essential capital expenditure, avoid blind expansion, and prioritize cutting costs and boosting efficiency by eliminating low-yield, inefficient capacity to preserve cash flow safety and navigate the industry cycle.

This article outlines the latest industry trends and core pain points of leading players in China’s raw milk sector, providing guidance on business direction for dairy industry chain service providers. Key takeaways are as follows:

1. Industry trends: The raw milk industry is currently in a deep downward correction, with capacity exiting at an accelerated pace and concentration gradually rising. Leading dairy companies are frequently moving to acquire and integrate their dairy farm assets – a prominent example is Mengniu’s push for Modern Dairy to acquire China Shengmu. Industry consolidation will continue in the coming period.

2. Core client pain points: Leading dairy farms are broadly facing massive losses, tight cash flow, weak demand for high-end milk, and greater management difficulty after mergers and acquisitions. Most small and medium-sized dairy farms are already loss-making, creating strong demand for solutions to cut costs, access capital, and improve management.

3. Guidance for business development: Service providers can develop targeted solutions to address these needs, including dairy farm capacity optimization services, low-cost financing services, M&A integration management consulting, and marketing services for high-end milk sources. These solutions help industry players navigate weak demand and resolve core pain points related to capital and management.

This article’s breakdown of China’s raw milk industry clarifies core industry demand and operational direction for dairy-related platform operators. Key takeaways are as follows:

1. Core industry demand for platforms: Current raw milk oversupply has left many farms with excess capacity and insufficient sales channels, creating demand for platforms to connect them with downstream B2B and B2C customers. Most farms also face tight cash flow, so they need supporting services such as supply chain finance from platforms to address working capital needs.

2. Risk mitigation guidance: With the entire industry currently loss-making and demand remaining weak, platforms looking to expand into upstream dairy-related business should control risk exposure, and avoid onboarding too many highly leveraged, persistently loss-making assets that could hurt the platform’s own operational health.

3.招商运营 opportunities: After accelerated industry consolidation, leading consolidated milk source companies have strong demand to expand sales channels. Platforms can carry out targeted招商, launch special sections for high-end raw milk to meet niche demand, and introduce raw milk price index services to improve pricing transparency and attract more users to the platform.

This article provides the latest first-hand case and industry developments from the raw milk downcycle, offering high research value for dairy industry analysts. Key takeaways are as follows:

1. Latest industry developments: China’s raw milk industry is currently in a deep downcycle. Oversupply has driven raw milk prices below the price of ordinary mineral water, a large share of the industry remains unprofitable, and overcapacity has not been fully resolved. Leading dairy company Mengniu has pushed for the consolidation of its two core upstream assets, Modern Dairy and China Shengmu, kicking off a wave of consolidation among leading milk source companies that will rapidly raise industry concentration going forward.

2. New industry questions: Even high-end organic milk sources are facing weak demand and widening losses during this downcycle. It remains unproven whether leading players’ strategy of integrating loss-making assets as a turnaround move will succeed. In addition, the frequent management turnover at leading dairy farms has created open questions about its impact on the execution of long-term corporate strategy that warrant further exploration.

3. Suggested research directions: Future research can focus on the performance of leading dairy companies’ vertical integration models for upstream milk sources, the effectiveness of cost-cutting and consolidation strategies for dairy farms during downcycles, and the pace of industry capacity exit and future raw milk price trends.

Disclaimer: The "Quick Summary" content is entirely generated by AI. Please exercise discretion when interpreting the information. For issues or corrections, please email run@ebrun.com .

I am a Brand Seller Factory Service Provider Marketplace Seller Researcher Read it again.

餐桌上的一杯奶,背后牵动着牧场、饲料、繁育、冷链等一整条产业链。而当人们喝奶的需求降低,压力会很快传导到牧场端。

自2021年以来,原料奶市场供大于求,行业进入下行周期,原料奶价格一降再降,到2025年时原料奶均价已低至3.06元/公斤,甚至不如一瓶矿泉水的价格。

即便是伊利和蒙牛两大乳业巨头旗下的牧场优然牧业、现代牧业都在加大力度淘汰低产牛,但仍陷入了“越卖越亏”的困境。

其中,尤以现代牧业亏损规模最大。2024年和2025年,现代牧业的权益股东应占利润两年累亏25.46亿元,远超优然牧业同期亏损总额11.23亿元。

在关键时刻,大股东蒙牛开始出手——将全资附属公司Start Great所持中国圣牧24.9%股权表决权授予现代牧业,并由现代牧业出面收购中国圣牧1.28%股权。

现代牧业试图整合中国圣牧的“沙漠有机”高端奶源,但问题在于,中国圣牧本身也面临着营收下滑、利润亏损的尴尬境地,人们似乎也并不愿意再为高端“买单”。

可以说,摆在现代牧业新任董事会主席陈易一面前的,不只是一次简单的并购整合,更是一场“利润保卫战”。

1

吞下圣牧,

“沙漠有机”也不挣钱

和牧场龙头优然牧业相比,现代牧业属于“后来者”。

2005年9月领先牧业注册成立,开始经营乳牛畜牧业务。次年,公司第一个乳牛场在安徽省马鞍山运作。当时,领先牧业最大的标签是「蒙牛原料奶供应商」。

现代牧业2010年在港股上市时发布的全球发售资料显示,直到2008年,现代牧业才在开曼群岛注册成立,此后又透过一系列股权转让,收购了领先牧业的所有资产、业务及营运附属公司。

2013年至2017年,蒙牛陆续完成了对现代牧业的控股。成立至今,现代牧业构建了“从一粒种到一杯奶”的全产业链,日产鲜奶超1万吨,市场占有率10%。

和现代牧业的地位相似,中国圣牧也是蒙牛的子公司。截至2026年5月22日,蒙牛通过全资附属公司Start Great持有中国圣牧29.99%股权,为其单一第一大股东。

可以看到,在现代牧业收购中国圣牧股权的过程中,蒙牛的身影一直存在。

根据现代牧业、Start Great与蒙牛签订的协议,Start Great将所持中国圣牧24.9%股权对应的表决权不可撤销地授予现代牧业,并放弃行使剩余股权对应的表决权(特殊情况除外)。

2026年5月22日,现代牧业完成收购中国圣牧约1.28%股权,代价为3752万港元。至此,现代牧业及其一致行动人Start Great合计持有中国圣牧31.26%股权,触发强制全面现金要约收购。

而早在2026年5月7日,现代牧业要约收购中国圣牧股权已取得国家市场监督管理总局的反垄断批准,意味着这场交易的外部障碍已扫清。

那么,现代牧业为何选择此时出手?

自2021年以来,原料奶的价格一降再降,现代牧业也无法逃脱外界环境影响。2025年,其原奶售价为3.33元/公斤,同比下滑7.7%;而原奶的销售成本达到2.32元/公斤,每斤毛利几乎只剩5毛。

而中国圣牧依托乌兰布和沙漠的自然地缘优势,奶源主打“沙漠有机”,走高端路线。2025年,中国圣牧原奶的销售价格为3.875元/公斤,明显售价更高。

不仅如此,截至2026年6月15日,中国圣牧的收盘价只剩0.335港元/股,同样处于历史低点,也无形中降低了收购成本。

据现代牧业披露,双方交易完成后,合并后的牛群总规模预计将超过61万头,合并后的年原奶产量将超过400万吨,产量直追“行业第一”优然牧业。

这也意味着,通过这场收购,现代牧业既能扩大规模、提高原奶产量,又能扩充高端奶源,还能抄底优质牧场股权,可谓是一举多得。

但问题在于,中国圣牧本身的业绩压力也将传导至现代牧业。

2024年和2025年,中国圣牧的销售收入分别为31.26亿元和30.12亿元,分别同比下滑7.61%、3.64%;母公司拥有人应占利润则分别亏损了6549.5万元、3.73亿元,亏损有扩大之势。

在这种情况下,中国圣牧又如何反哺现代牧业?

2

2年累亏超25亿,

资金链紧张

现代牧业出手收购中国圣牧,与其说是一场进攻,不如说是一次被逼到墙角的“自救”。

从2024年开始,现代牧业的业绩就明显承压。2024年,公司实现销售收入132.54亿元,同比下滑1.5%,这是2018年来销售收入首次出现下滑。

到了2025年,现代牧业的销售收入继续下挫4.9%,降至126.01亿元。其中,生鲜奶在多卖了24.6万吨的情况下,勉强维持了原料奶收入的平稳,但受市场需求疲弱影响,养殖综合解决方案业务收入同比减少23.8%至21.35亿元。

在市场需求疲软之下,现代牧业已经在采取一系列措施来节流降本。例如,加大力度淘汰低产牛,2025年末的畜群规模为45.69万头,较2024年底减少约3.4万头;生物资产同比减少9.4%至112.7亿元。

此外,原奶的饲料成本同比下滑9.2%,带动整体销售成本同比下滑8.3%至2.32元/公斤;资本开支同比下滑29.3%至24.42亿元。

即便如此,利润还是不可避免地滑向亏损。2024年和2025年,公司权益股东应占利润分别亏损了14.17亿元、11.29亿元,两年累亏高达25.46亿元,基本将2020年至2023年这4年积累的利润(25.26亿元)全部吞噬。

放在行业中来看,现代牧业的亏损规模也是罕见的。

以全球最大的原料奶供应商优然牧业为例,2023年,公司拥有人应占亏损达到10.50亿元,此后两年又分别亏损了6.91亿元、4.32亿元,三年累计亏损21.73亿元,仍然低于现代牧业近2年的亏损总额。

连续亏损之后,现代牧业的资金链已经趋于紧张。

截至2025年末,现代牧业有息借款总额高达192.6亿元,同比大涨33.2%,其中一年内到期借款达到71.4亿元。同期,其短期银行结余、金融资产等流动资金合计不足70亿元,已无法覆盖短债。

现代牧业的杠杆在加码,风险也在累积。于2025年末,其资产负债比率同比增加5.9个百分点至73.2%,已经反超优然牧业(72.05%);净有息借款比率同比增加4.4个百分点至53.6%。

资金链承压之下,现代牧业要约收购中国圣牧的资金压力也是显而易见的。

按照计划,现代牧业要约收购中国圣牧的价格为0.35港元/股,涉及要约收购股份为57.61亿股,最高总代价约20.16亿港元。

那么,要约收购中国圣牧的资金从何而来?如何缓解自身资金链压力?蒙牛是否会出手帮助缓解资金压力?在中国圣牧本就亏损的情况下,要约收购之后是否会进一步拖累自身利润表现?在收购中国圣牧之后,蒙牛对两大牧场有何安排、调整?

对此,「子弹财经」试图向现代牧业方面进行了解,但截至发稿仍未获回复。

3

3年更换2任董事会主席,

管理层动荡

业绩层面所承受的压力,已经传导至管理层——短短3年时间,现代牧业的董事会主席就更换了2任。

2023年2月,在位6年的卢敏放因工作职责分工调整,卸任现代牧业董事会主席之职,由赵杰军接任。卢敏放曾历任蒙牛的总裁、副董事长等职,正是在他的主导下,蒙牛完成了对现代牧业的控股,以及拿下中国圣牧的单一最大股东之位。

然而,赵杰军上位“一把手”仅2年半,2025年9月便以“个人健康”为由辞任,改任子公司专家顾问,由陈易一接任董事会主席之位。

2021年12月,陈易一加入蒙牛,担任蒙牛集团副总裁,负责战略和投资管理。在此之前,陈易一曾先后任职于雀巢、华润创业、皇氏集团等知名企业,在快消品乳业及零售业方面拥有丰富经验。

此外,陈易一还担任中国圣牧董事会主席、妙可蓝多董事会主席,是蒙牛在乳业上下游产业链上的关键人物。

陈易一上任后,现代牧业的人事调整并未停止。据「子弹财经」不完全统计,2025年9月以来,公司的非执行董事、提名委员会成员、可持续发展委员会主席、薪酬委员会成员等职位相继发生更迭。

只是,董事会主席频繁变更,如何保证长期战略的执行?为何此时如此密集的调整管理团队?是否控股股东蒙牛对业绩提出了不满?预计何时才能扭亏?

对此,「子弹财经」试图向现代牧业方面进行了解,但截至发稿仍未获回复。

客观来看,新管理层接手的绝非一个轻松的摊子。

据农业农村部、华创证券资料,2024年以来,由于行业奶价承压,行业亏损面曾飙升到90%以上的高位。进入2025年后,随着饲料成本压力缓解以及散奶和固体乳价格环比回升,亏损面虽逐步缩小,但亏损比例依旧偏高。

面对亏损的压力,牧场在加速淘汰低产牛,2025年全国牛群数量同比下降27.7万头至592万头。但奶牛反而更加高产,2025年全国原料奶产量4091万吨,同比略增0.3%,行业产能过剩仍未完全出清。

奶价尚未回升之时,负债率高企、资金链紧绷、拟要约收购的中国圣牧自身也在亏损泥潭中挣扎……而化解这些难题的重任,都落在了陈易一的肩上。

只是,在原料奶下行周期里,现代牧业的这场“利润保卫战”,或许比想象中更难打。

注:文/王亚静,文章来源:子弹财经(公众号ID:Mzg5OTkwMzM0Ng==),本文为作者独立观点,不代表亿邦动力立场。

文章来源:子弹财经

广告
微信
朋友圈

这么好看,分享一下?

朋友圈 分享

APP内打开

+1
+1
微信好友 朋友圈 新浪微博 QQ空间
关闭
收藏成功
发送
/140 0