广告
加载中

渠道再变革 家电618增长在即时零售?

李白 2026-06-16 15:18
李白 2026/06/16 15:18

邦小白快读

EN
全文速览

本文核心讲当前家电行业增长乏力,头部品牌集体布局即时零售新渠道,给普通消费者带来了新的购物选择,同时也有需要注意的问题

1. 即时零售是家电购物的新模式,消费者可以像点外卖一样在线上下单空调、洗衣机等家电,多数品牌推出半日达、送装一体服务,能满足应急、即兴购买的需求,比传统电商更快完成收货安装。

2. 当前该模式还不完善,存在不少问题:不同品牌、门店的服务和价格差异大,线上线下价格不一致,容易存在信息差,部分门店可能出现串货、无码机,售后权责不够清晰,销售旺季还可能出现配送安装脱节的问题,三四线城市整体体验不如大城市。

3. 普通消费者选购高客单价家电时,不能只看配送速度,要提前确认价格、售后政策、上门安装时间,保障自身权益。

当前家电行业存量增长乏力,传统线上线下渠道都陷入增长瓶颈,即时零售成为家电品牌开辟新增长曲线的核心方向,干货总结如下

1. 渠道与消费趋势变化:即时零售2026年即将突破万亿规模,头部平台已经积累了大量主动搜索家电的用户,空调旺季单品类搜索量可达800万人次,渠道逻辑从传统下沉覆盖进阶为周边即时触达,购物逻辑从人找货转向货找人,行业迎来新的渠道变革期。

2. 现存问题与挑战:不同品牌、门店运营能力差异大,三四线市场渗透不足,即时零售打破了原有层层分销的价格体系和区域保护,容易引发厂商与经销商的利益矛盾,还存在售后管控难、服务标准不统一、消费者信任不足等问题。

3. 发展方向提示:即时零售不是万能解药,无法解决行业需求收缩的根本问题,品牌需要从渠道竞争转向产品研发和服务升级,靠价值竞争代替价格竞争,才能真正实现可持续增长。

当前家电传统渠道增长瓶颈凸显,即时零售为家电线下卖家带来了新的增量机会,同时也存在不少风险需要警惕,核心干货如下

1. 新增量机会:即时零售市场即将突破万亿,头部平台拥有海量搜索家电的用户,做即时零售可以激活线下门店的闲置库存,覆盖传统电商满足不了的应急、即兴消费需求,目前三四线城市即时零售家电的心智还未成熟,红利有待释放,提前布局就能抢占先机。

2. 需要警惕的风险:当前家电行业平均净利率仅5%-8%,平台抽成加上可能出现的价格战,会进一步挤压利润空间,此前餐饮外卖大战就出现过八成商户利润下滑的先例,另外即时零售打破了原有价格体系和区域保护,卖家可能沦为品牌的前置仓,失去利润自主权,还容易因为售后权责不清引发消费纠纷,影响门店口碑。

3. 可操作的方向:提升自身门店的运营能力,统一服务标准,明确售后权责,抓住下沉市场的红利提前布局,争取获得更多增长空间。

当前家电行业进入存量竞争阶段,传统渠道增长乏力,即时零售给家电工厂带来了新的商业机会,也对工厂的运营管理提出了新要求,核心干货如下

1. 新商业机会:即时零售市场规模2026年即将突破万亿,头部平台年搜索家电的用户超过1.2亿,拥有海量潜在客源,能帮助工厂开辟新的增长曲线,还能激活线下经销商的闲置库存,覆盖传统电商满足不了的应急消费场景,三四线市场还有大量未释放的红利,增长空间充足。

2. 现存需要解决的问题:线下不同门店的运营能力差异大,工厂对门店的管控存在漏洞,容易出现价格参差不齐、串货卖无码机、售后权责不清等问题,会损害品牌口碑,消费者购买高客单价家电更看重产品质量和长期售后,单纯的配送速度无法打动消费者。

3. 数字化与电商转型启示:工厂需要推进线下门店的数字化统一管理,统一价格体系和服务标准,同时要加大产品研发投入,推出符合消费者需求的创新产品,升级售后保障体系,将竞争重心从渠道转向产品和服务,抓住下沉市场的渗透机会,挖掘新增量。

家电头部品牌集体布局即时零售,给家电相关服务商带来了新的市场增长机会,也暴露了行业现存的痛点,核心干货总结如下

1. 行业发展趋势:随着家电行业全面入局即时零售,市场对即时配送、专业安装、统一售后的服务需求大幅增长,即时零售市场即将迈入万亿规模,带动家电服务行业的规模持续扩容,下沉市场的服务需求也会逐步释放,行业增长空间充足。

2. 核心客户痛点:对品牌商和线下门店来说,当前最大的痛点是配送和安装脱节,销售旺季服务能力不足,送装一体履约难度大,大家电配送整体费率仅2%-3%,成本压力大,不同区域服务能力参差不齐,标准不统一,影响消费者体验;对消费者来说,痛点是配送安装不同步、售后权责不清,容易产生体验落差。

3. 发展方向参考:服务商可以搭建统一化的送装一体服务体系,提升旺季的服务调度能力,和品牌、平台合作建立标准化的服务流程,对接品牌和门店的履约需求,同时提前布局下沉市场的服务业务,抢占新的市场份额。

家电行业集体布局即时零售,给即时零售平台带来了新的发展机会,也提出了新的运营要求,核心干货如下

1. 商家对平台的核心需求:家电品牌和线下门店希望平台降低抽成费用,给予门店更多流量分配的自主权,同时希望平台出台统一的规则,协调解决价格混乱、售后权责不清等问题,降低门店的经营风险。

2. 平台现有布局方向:当前头部即时零售平台都在发力家电即时零售,通过引入品牌线下门店、落地品牌闪电仓、推出两小时送装服务等方式拓展品类,布局家电业务可以解决平台原本客单价偏低、利润空间不足的痛点,优化平台的利润结构。

3. 需要规避的风险:平台需要平衡自身、品牌商、线下门店多方的利益,避免发起过度补贴价格战,导致门店利润大面积下滑,同时要建立统一的商家准入、价格管控、售后管理规则,解决买卖双方的信息差问题,规范服务标准,建立消费者信任,还要进一步挖掘下沉市场的商家资源,扩大市场覆盖。

本文研究了当前我国家电行业渠道变革的最新动向,头部品牌集体入局即时零售,为产业研究提供了很多新的内容,核心干货如下

1. 产业新动向:我国家电行业先后经历了线下连锁时代、传统电商时代,现在正式进入即时零售的第三个渠道发展阶段,行业竞争底层逻辑发生变化,从人找货转向货找人,整体竞争从价格竞争、渠道竞争逐步转向产品和服务的价值竞争,行业发展从追求规模扩张转向追求高质量发展。

2. 行业新问题:即时零售发展过程中存在多方利益博弈,平台掌握流量入口,厂商掌握线下门店和供应链,双方互相制衡;厂商和原有经销商渠道存在利益冲突,原有价格体系和区域保护被打破,利润分配矛盾突出;C端存在售后信息差、服务标准不统一、消费者信任不足的问题,同时即时零售只能解决渠道效率问题,无法解决行业需求收缩的根本问题。

3. 商业模式研究启示:即时零售是依托线下门店库存+本地即时履约的新渠道商业模式,激活了线下闲置资产,开辟了新的增量空间,但本质还是渠道变革,家电行业破局最终需要回归产品和服务本身。

返回默认

声明:快读内容全程由AI生成,请注意甄别信息。如您发现问题,请发送邮件至 run@ebrun.com 。

我是 品牌商 卖家 工厂 服务商 平台商 研究者 帮我再读一遍。

Quick Summary

This article focuses on the current sluggish growth of China's home appliance industry, where leading brands have collectively entered instant retail as a new sales channel. This development brings new shopping options for general consumers, but also raises issues that require attention.

1. Instant retail is a new model for home appliance shopping: consumers can order large appliances such as air conditioners and washing machines online just like ordering food delivery. Most brands offer half-day delivery and integrated delivery-and-installation services, which meet emergency and impulsive purchase needs, and complete delivery and installation much faster than traditional e-commerce.

2. This model is still underdeveloped and faces multiple problems: service quality and pricing vary widely across brands and stores, with inconsistent pricing between online and offline channels that creates information asymmetry. Some stores may sell diverted unauthorized products and unregistered grey-market machines, with unclear after-sales responsibility. Delivery and installation can also fall out of sync during peak sales seasons, and overall experience in tier-3 and tier-4 cities lags behind that in major cities.

3. When purchasing high-value home appliances, consumers should not prioritize delivery speed alone. To protect their interests, they need to confirm pricing, after-sales policies, and on-site installation schedules in advance.

Against the backdrop of stagnant volume growth in China's maturing home appliance industry, both traditional online and offline channels have hit growth ceilings. Instant retail has emerged as a core path for home appliance brands to unlock new growth. Key takeaways are as follows:

1. Shifts in channel and consumer trends: The instant retail market is set to exceed 1 trillion yuan by 2026. Leading platforms have already accumulated a large base of users actively searching for home appliances, with search volume for air conditioners alone hitting 8 million visits during peak summer seasons. The channel logic has evolved from traditional mass market coverage to immediate local reach, while the shopping logic has shifted from "consumers find goods" to "goods reach consumers", putting the industry in a new era of channel transformation.

2. Existing problems and challenges: Operational capabilities vary greatly across brands and physical stores, with penetration remaining low in lower-tier markets. Instant retail disrupts the original multi-layer distribution pricing system and regional protection rules, easily triggering interest conflicts between manufacturers and dealers. It also brings pain points including difficult after-sales governance, inconsistent service standards, and low consumer trust.

3. Guidance on development direction: Instant retail is not a panacea, and cannot solve the core problem of shrinking industry demand. Brands need to shift their focus from channel competition to product R&D and service upgrading, replacing price competition with value competition to achieve truly sustainable growth.

As traditional home appliance channels hit clear growth bottlenecks, instant retail brings new incremental opportunities for offline home appliance sellers, but also carries notable risks to watch for. Key takeaways are as follows:

1. New incremental opportunities: The instant retail market is set to exceed 1 trillion yuan, and leading platforms host huge volumes of user searches for home appliances. Adopting instant retail allows sellers to activate idle inventory in physical stores, and capture emergency and impulsive consumer demand that traditional e-commerce cannot meet. Currently, consumer awareness of instant retail for home appliances is still underdeveloped in tier-3 and tier-4 cities, where untapped market红利 remains. Early布局 helps sellers seize a first-mover advantage.

2. Risks to watch out for: The average net profit margin of the home appliance industry currently stands at only 5% to 8%. Platform commission fees plus potential price wars will further compress profit margins, echoing the food delivery war where 80% of participating merchants saw profits decline. In addition, by disrupting the original pricing system and regional protection, instant retail may leave sellers acting as nothing more than front warehouses for brands, stripping them of pricing autonomy. It also carries the risk of consumer disputes from unclear after-sales responsibility, which can damage a store's reputation.

3. Actionable strategies: Sellers should improve store operational capabilities, standardize service quality, clarify after-sales responsibilities, seize the market opportunity in lower-tier cities through early布局, and position themselves to capture greater growth.

China's home appliance industry has entered a stage of stock competition, with traditional channels seeing sluggish growth. Instant retail brings new business opportunities for home appliance manufacturers, while also raising new requirements for their operations and management. Key takeaways are as follows:

1. New business opportunities: The instant retail market will exceed 1 trillion yuan by 2026, with more than 120 million annual home appliance searches on leading platforms, providing access to massive potential customers. It helps manufacturers open up new growth curves, activate idle inventory held by offline dealers, and serve emergency consumption scenarios that traditional e-commerce cannot cover. Tier-3 and tier-4 cities still hold large untapped红利 with sufficient room for growth.

2. Existing problems to solve: There is a large gap in operational capabilities across offline stores, and manufacturers often lack effective oversight over local stores. This can lead to uneven pricing, unauthorized diverted sales, grey-market unregistered products, and unclear after-sales responsibility, all of which damage brand reputation. Consumers purchasing high-ticket home appliances prioritize product quality and long-term after-sales service far more than delivery speed, so speed alone is not enough to win them over.

3. Insights for digital and e-commerce transformation: Manufacturers need to implement unified digital management for offline stores, standardize pricing systems and service quality. They should also increase investment in product R&D, launch innovative products that match consumer demand, upgrade after-sales guarantee systems, shift the focus of competition from channels to products and services, capture penetration opportunities in lower-tier markets, and unlock new growth.

The collective布局 of instant retail by leading home appliance brands brings new market growth opportunities for home appliance-related service providers, while also exposing existing industry pain points. Key takeaways are as follows:

1. Industry development trends: As the entire home appliance industry enters the instant retail space, market demand for instant delivery, professional installation, and unified after-sales service has grown significantly. The overall instant retail market is approaching 1 trillion yuan, driving continuous expansion of the home appliance service sector. Service demand in lower-tier markets will also gradually release, providing sufficient room for industry growth.

2. Core client pain points: For brands and offline stores, the biggest pain points are disjointed delivery and installation, insufficient service capacity during peak sales seasons, and the high difficulty of fulfilling integrated delivery-and-installation orders. The overall delivery fee rate for large home appliances is only 2% to 3%, creating heavy cost pressure. In addition, uneven service quality and inconsistent standards across regions hurt consumer experience. For consumers, the top pain points are unsynchronized delivery and installation, unclear after-sales responsibility, which leads to disappointing experience.

3. Recommended development paths: Service providers can build a unified integrated delivery-and-installation system, improve service scheduling capacity during peak seasons, partner with brands and platforms to establish standardized service processes that meet the fulfillment needs of brands and stores, and布局 service business in lower-tier markets in advance to capture new market share.

The collective布局 of instant retail by the home appliance industry brings new development opportunities for instant retail platforms, while also raising new operational requirements. Key takeaways are as follows:

1. Core demands from merchants on platforms: Home appliance brands and offline stores hope that platforms will lower commission fees, grant stores more autonomy over traffic allocation, introduce unified rules to coordinate and resolve issues such as chaotic pricing and unclear after-sales responsibility, and reduce operational risks for stores.

2. Current布局 directions for platforms: Leading instant retail platforms are all prioritizing home appliance instant retail, expanding the category by onboarding brand offline stores, launching dedicated brand flash warehouses, and rolling out 2-hour delivery-and-installation services. Adding home appliance business helps platforms address their original pain points of low average order value and insufficient profit margins, and optimizes the platform's profit structure.

3. Risks to avoid: Platforms need to balance the interests of themselves, brands, and offline stores, and avoid launching excessive subsidized price wars that would lead to broad-based profit declines for stores. They also need to establish unified rules for merchant onboarding, price control, and after-sales management to resolve information asymmetry between buyers and sellers, standardize service quality, build consumer trust, and further tap into merchant resources in lower-tier markets to expand market coverage.

This article studies the latest trends in channel transformation in China's home appliance industry, where leading brands have collectively entered the instant retail space, bringing new insights for industrial research. Key takeaways are as follows:

1. New industrial trends: China's home appliance industry has successively gone through the offline chain store era and the traditional e-commerce era, and has now officially entered the third stage of channel development: instant retail. The underlying logic of industry competition has changed: the shopping logic has shifted from "consumers find goods" to "goods reach consumers"; overall competition is gradually shifting from price competition and channel competition to value competition centered on products and services; and industry development is shifting from pursuing scale expansion to pursuing high-quality growth.

2. New industry problems: Multi-stakeholder conflicts exist during the development of instant retail. Platforms control the traffic entrance, while manufacturers control offline stores and supply chains, creating a mutual check and balance. Manufacturers also face interest conflicts with their existing dealer networks, as the original pricing system and regional protection is disrupted, leading to prominent profit distribution disputes. On the consumer side, there are problems of after-sales information asymmetry, inconsistent service standards, and low consumer trust. In addition, instant retail can only improve channel efficiency, and cannot solve the fundamental problem of shrinking industry demand.

3. Insights for business model research: Instant retail is a new channel business model that relies on offline store inventory and local instant fulfillment. It activates idle offline assets and opens up new incremental space, but it is still essentially a channel transformation. For the home appliance industry to break through its current bottlenecks, it ultimately needs to refocus on products and services themselves.

Disclaimer: The "Quick Summary" content is entirely generated by AI. Please exercise discretion when interpreting the information. For issues or corrections, please email run@ebrun.com .

I am a Brand Seller Factory Service Provider Marketplace Seller Researcher Read it again.

万亿即时零售,能救家电行业吗?

美的、格力、海尔们,财报都不太好。因为,家电行业需求不振久矣。

长期以来,外界谈及家电竞争,大多聚焦在产品、补贴和电商平台上,但今年618,家电行业的焦灼竞争又新增加了一种更激进打法。

往年铺天盖地的最低价标语有所减少,取而代之的是半日达、送装一体、即买即装的时效承诺,很明显,即时零售又成了大厂们生死搏斗的竞赛场。

按照这个逻辑,以往在美团、淘宝闪购点外卖的范围扩大到了“点空调”“点洗衣机”。

格力、美的、海尔等巨头集体押注即时零售,美团、淘宝闪购在本地生活战场短兵相接。看似突然的转向,实则是家电行业在存量时代被逼到墙角后的绝地反击。

作为新的一种渠道通路,即时零售改变了家电业传统的渠道下沉打法,将覆盖策略进阶为周边即时达的战术。

1

闯入本地生活大战的家电商

背水一战

坦率地讲,与声势浩大的餐饮外卖大战相比,一直以来大家电在即时零售赛道声量要小得多,而如今,一切都开始变了。

今年618,家电厂商的动作空前一致。

此前格力与美团闪购达成战略合作,计划在7月底前完成全国1.3万家线下门店的全线入驻,推出空调“半日拆送装一体化”服务。小米旗下1万家小米门店也已进驻美团闪购。苏宁易购宣布升级即时零售战略,采取“店仓一体+独立前仓”的双轨模式,构建多级履约体系,部分门店试行“24小时+全品类”营业模式。而在近2年前,美的早就入驻了外卖平台。

这表明,不同厂商以及品牌零售商,对即时零售反应效率不同,而到了今年夏季,虽然大家风向标看齐了。陆玖商业评论以重庆市场为例,查询了个别品牌在外卖网络平台上的店铺和订单情况,仍发现三个显著的特征:

(1)该样本之下,格力、美的、小米等各品牌之间销量差异巨大,同品牌不同店面的即时零售销量同样巨大,不同品类如冰箱洗衣机空调等SKU的销量也不尽相同。均受运营水平、经营能力、消费氛围等影响呈现出参差不同的结构;

(2)家电类的商家主页顶部右侧没有评价栏,进入店铺的用户无法像餐饮商家一样,明眼就能看到消费者的评价详情。

(3)地域差异化明显,不同地域下即时零售的心智和消费习惯不同,即时零售家电在大城市和小县城的渗透水平不在同一水平,三、四线城市的即时零售家电红利待释放。

“上述这些结构性的特点表明,当下每个巨头都试图在新市场获得新销售增量,可其内部差异还是明显,厂家在这块的资源以及精力投入还存在短板。况且,无论是增加门店供给,推动装送一体的履约落地,其本质上没有脱离家电渠道竞争的范畴,这些都是家电厂商集体杀入即时零售,生存压力下的必然选择。”一些曾接触过家电业务的人员告诉陆玖商业评论。

他进一步指出,当传统线上线下渠道双双陷入增长瓶颈,价格战已经打到无利可图,以及消费者对每年几乎没啥新玩法的大促热情逐渐消退,家电行业必须找到新的增长曲线。而正在逼近万亿规模的即时零售市场,成了所有人眼中的最后一块蛋糕。

该人士的逻辑是站得住脚的,公开资料显示,2025年前11个月,家电线上零售量占比达到74%,但零售额占比仅为48%。

坦率地讲,这个刺眼的数字,道尽了传统电商“高销量、低利润”的尴尬。持续攀升的引流成本和推广费用,不断挤压品牌与经销商的利润空间。

部分线下门店的日子更不好过,日常时段客流稀疏,只有大促期间才能短暂提振人气。很多消费者到店看完样机、对比参数后,转身就去线上比价下单。线下门店成了免费的体验店,却赚不到一分钱利润。

随之而来的是行业增长乏力的寒意,这在2026年一季度的财报中体现得淋漓尽致。

公开资料显示,2026年第一季度,美的实现营业收入1310.99亿元,同比增长2.55%;归属于上市公司股东的净利润为126.75亿元,同比增长2.03%,相比于2025年第一季度20.61%的营收增长率和38.02%的利润增长率,美的业绩增速出现了明显下滑。

格力收入430.80亿元,同比增长3.46%,实现归母净利润60.82亿元,同比增长3.01%,海尔智家则成为三家中唯一收入、利润双降的企业,营收同比下降6.86%,归母净利润同比下降15.22%。

由此一个扎心的事实浮出水面:曾经动辄两位数增长的家电行业,如今能保持个位数增长就已经算得上优秀。

而就在这样的背景下,即时零售的确在以惊人的速度崛起。商务部研究院发布的报告显示,2025年国内即时零售市场规模已达9714亿元,2026年有望突破万亿规模,预计2030年将增至2万亿元。

据外界报道,美团手握超5亿平台用户,2025年全年有1.2亿以上用户主动在平台检索家电产品,每逢空调销售旺季,单品类搜索量就能达到800万人次,这个庞大的用户群体,让家电厂商看到了新的希望。

回过头来看,过去二十年,家电行业先后经历了线下连锁时代和电商时代,每一次渠道变革都伴随着行业格局的重塑。如今,即时零售正在开启第三个时代。

那些曾经依靠渠道红利崛起的品牌,如今必须学会在新的游戏规则下生存。家电行业从“人找货”到“货找人”的底层逻辑转变。谁能率先适应这种转变,谁就能在未来的竞争中占据主动。可不能忽略的事实是,即时零售家电看似红利满满,实则各有各的算盘。

02

新渠道赌局中,

各有各的利益博弈

即时零售的战场看似一片繁荣,实则暗流涌动。

平台、厂商、经销商(门店)、消费者,每一方都有自己的利益诉求,每一方都在这场博弈中寻找自己的位置。表面上是速度的竞争,背后是利益的重新分配。而利益分配的矛盾,正是即时零售最大的挑战。

一方面,平台与厂商之间的博弈或多或少是存在的。即时零售平台拥有庞大的流量和成熟的配送体系,掌握着用户入口。

厂商拥有产品和上万家的线下门店资源,掌握着供应链和服务能力。双方看似是合作伙伴,实则是互相制衡的关系。

平台希望通过抽成和广告变现获取利润,美团外卖平均客单价22-34元、生鲜80-100元,单均配送成本接近7元,偏低的客单不断挤压利润空间,而大家电客单价高,发力家电更是破解即时零售固有痛点的关键。

有的门店则希望降低平台费用,掌握流量分配的主动权。

更重要的是,平台并不满足于只做一个业态通路,它们希望深入家电行业的供应链和服务环节,打造自己的生态闭环。无论是美团还是淘宝闪购,小米、格力、美的、海尔等家电品牌的门店仓都是其整个3C家电百货数码供给中的一环,而非唯一。比如美团同年6月联手苏宁上线大家电两小时送装服务,落地品牌闪电仓,批量引进一众头部小家电与3C品牌。

另外一方面,厂商与门店之间也各有诉求。

过去,家电行业的传统渠道体系,是建立在层层分销的基础上的。经销商和门店承担着库存、物流、安装、售后等一系列职能,是厂商连接消费者的重要桥梁。

而即时零售的出现,有可能打破了原有的价格体系和区域保护。

陆玖商业评论从一些经营线上即时零售的商家了解了价格差异,他表示,线上门店有各类满减活动,但如果是到线下门店,可以享受到价格优惠,比如国补又比如其他折扣可能更多元和灵活。线上门店的比价差异过于透明,虽然有的平台看似统一价格,由于门店太多,可能也参差不齐。

不完全排除个别门店担心,自己会沦为厂商的“前置仓”和“安装工”,失去一些价格和利润空间优势。外界报道目前家电行业平均净利率仅5%—8%,一旦闪购平台因为行业即时零售大战再次引发补贴战,对经销商和门店无疑是雪上加霜。因为此前外卖大战以来,八成餐饮商户净利润下滑的事情便是前车之鉴。

视线再聚焦到消费者服务界面,其与品牌厂家还有门店之间可能存在一种“信息差”,进而容易引发售后问题。

多年经营家电业务的但先生指出,表面上什么东西都放在了平台,实际上还是可能存在问题,最大的问题就是以后的售后问题,还有货源,同样的型号有可能是翻新的机器,瑕疵机,一般人难以辨别。无论是品牌授权店或者直营店还是其他什么类型的门店。厂家的管控一定会有,比如装送一体服务,限时内到达,对门店的经营标准的要求。可实际操作过程中,难免存在管理薄弱的环节,例如,如果碰到有老板卖串货、无码机怎么管?这是需要关注的风险。

上述现象有一定合理性,家住重庆的朱先生此前在外卖平台购买了小米的冰箱和洗衣机,后对退换货产生了争执,小米之家有按照其规定的小米之家退换货政策,用户有基于国家法律退换货规定的说辞。可能双方都有一定合理性,但真正的问题是由于网络点单带来的信息误差,各方面在信息互通上没有直接到店面购买那么直接和清晰。

与此同时,服务标准不统一,同样是另一个亟待解决的难题。

即时零售的核心是“快”,但家电产品尤其是大家电,不仅需要快速配送,还需要专业的安装和售后服务。送装一体说起来容易,做起来却很难。

在陆玖商业评论的实际了解和调研中,不同地区的服务能力参差不齐,不同门店服务标准也不一样。有些门店目前是商家自配送,承诺送装时间,但实际操作中不完全排除经常出现配送和安装脱节的情况。假设消费者下单后,可能当天就能收到货,但安装师傅却可能要按订单先后完成情况才能上门,这种现象尤其在旺季时有发生。

此外,奥维云网2026年4月数据显示,线下空调均价4195元,即便叠加全套送装服务,整体配送费率仅2%—3%。上述的但先生还指出,如果是自己上平台,会加价卖。

结论很明显,体验上的落差感和配送费等方面的负担,大概率都是消费者买单,就很容易引发部分消费者的不满。

总归来讲,消费者的信任问题,目前或多或少制约着即时零售的发展。大家电属于高客单价耐用消费品,使用寿命普遍在5至10年。消费者选购时习惯于多方比价、反复筛选,更看重产品的质量和售后服务,而不是单纯的配送速度。

03

即时零售不是噱头

中国的家电行业的确面临需求不振的问题,奥维云网的数据显示,2026年一季度中国家电市场(不含3C)全渠道零售额同比下滑6.2%。

理论上,即时零售给家电行业注入了新的活力,但它并不是万能解药。它能解决渠道效率的问题,却解决不了行业需求收缩的根本问题。它能带来短期的销量增长,却不能改变家电行业存量竞争的本质。家电行业的未来,最终还是要回归产品和服务本身。

不可否认,即时零售确实打开了家电行业的增量空间,它激活了线下门店的闲置库存,让沉睡的资产变成了流动的商品。它覆盖了传统电商无法满足的应急需求和即兴消费场景。

事实上渠道永远只是手段,产品和服务才是核心。例如,即时零售可以让产品更快地送到消费者手中,但不能让产品变得更好。如果产品本身没有竞争力,再快的配送也无济于事。

服务也是如此。送装一体只是基础服务,真正能打动消费者的,是长期的售后保障和贴心的用户体验。去年以来,格力、小米、奥克斯等空调品牌纷纷提出10年包修,美的全面升级“只换不修”承诺。这些动作表明,家电行业的竞争已经从渠道竞争转向服务竞争。

陆玖商业评论认为,家电行业的增长困局,不是靠一个新渠道就能解决的。它需要行业从追求规模扩张转向追求高质量发展,从价格竞争转向价值竞争。

厂商需要加大研发投入,推出更多符合消费者需求的创新产品。需要提升服务质量,打造差异化的服务体验。需要优化供应链,提高运营效率。只有这样,家电行业才能真正走出困境,实现可持续发展。

今年618的家电战场,没有了往年的喧嚣和浮躁,多了几分理性和沉稳。厂商们不再盲目追求销量和GMV,而是更加注重利润和用户体验。

618大战,卷价格、卷渠道的时代已经落幕了。既然大家都有闪购、同城快递和外卖式的物流体系,就让“即时零售”成为新的家电渠道竞争的切入点吧!

注:文/李白,文章来源:陆玖商业评论(公众号ID:MzIyMDc5MjMyNQ==),本文为作者独立观点,不代表亿邦动力立场。

文章来源:陆玖商业评论

广告
微信
朋友圈

这么好看,分享一下?

朋友圈 分享

APP内打开

+1
+1
微信好友 朋友圈 新浪微博 QQ空间
关闭
收藏成功
发送
/140 0