广告
加载中

奶不如水贵?现代牧业“过冬”:两年累亏25亿 3年换2任董事长

王亚静 2026-06-16 07:20
王亚静 2026/06/16 07:20

邦小白快读

EN
全文速览

本文核心披露了国内原料奶行业进入下行周期后,头部牧场现代牧业的经营困境与自救动作,核心重点信息整理如下:

1.行业整体现状:2021年以来原料奶供大于求,价格持续下滑,2025年原料奶均价低至3.06元/公斤,甚至低于瓶装矿泉水价格,全行业亏损面最高达到90%以上,目前产能过剩仍未完全出清。

2.现代牧业经营情况:作为头部牧场,现代牧业2024-2025年两年累计亏损25.46亿元,直接亏光了2020-2023年四年积累的25.26亿元利润;截至2025年末,公司有息借款高达192.6亿元,一年内到期短债71.4亿元,流动资金合计不足70亿元,无法覆盖短期负债,资金链压力极大。

3.公司自救动作:短短3年更换2任董事会主席,现任董事长陈易一是蒙牛系核心人物,目前现代牧业正在收购整合中国圣牧,试图扩大规模获取高端奶源,但中国圣牧自身也连续亏损,整合效果尚不明朗。

本文披露了当前国内原料奶行业的发展现状与消费趋势,可为乳业品牌商的经营决策提供参考,核心干货整理如下:

1.消费趋势与行业环境:当前国内消费者喝奶需求整体降低,高端奶消费遇冷,市场对高端奶源概念的买单意愿下降,整个行业从增量进入存量下行周期,原料奶供大于求,产能过剩尚未完全出清,全行业亏损比例仍处于高位。

2.产品布局参考:即便是主打沙漠有机的高端定位奶源,也陷入了连续亏损且亏损扩大的困境,说明高端产品布局不能只依赖概念,需要匹配当下大众消费能力与真实需求,品牌商需要调整高端产品的定价与营销策略,避免踩坑。

3.周期应对参考:行业下行周期中,头部乳企选择整合内部牧场资源,通过淘汰低产低效产能降本,抄底收购优质资产扩大规模,优化奶源产品分层结构,这种整合思路可供品牌商参考,调整自身奶源布局与产品结构,应对周期波动。

本文梳理了原料奶行业下行周期的现状与风险机会,可为乳业相关卖家提供参考,核心干货整理如下:

1.风险提示:当前原料奶市场供大于求,价格持续走低,全行业亏损面最高超过90%,虽然有所缓解但亏损比例仍偏高,产能过剩尚未出清,需求疲软带来的价格竞争风险较高,卖家需要提前做好应对准备,管控自身经营风险。

2.机会提示:当前头部乳企正在加速整合旗下牧场资源,行业集中度会不断提升,中小乳业卖家可以寻找和头部企业的合作机会,对接头部的供应链与渠道资源,获得生存空间;同时行业整合阶段也存在抄底优质资产的机会,有资金实力的卖家可以把握机会布局。

3.可参考应对措施:头部企业在下行周期中,通过淘汰低产低效产能、缩减资本开支降本,同时优化现金流管控,这些做法都可供不同规模的卖家参考,核心是要控制负债规模,避免短债过高引发资金链断裂。

本文梳理了国内原奶生产行业的最新发展情况,可为原奶生产相关工厂提供经营参考,核心干货整理如下:

1.产品生产与设计需求:当前市场需求疲软,原奶整体供大于求,成本控制是核心竞争力,低产牛会拉高生产成本,已经不适应市场需求,牧场需要主动优化牛群结构,淘汰低产牛;高端有机是产品差异化方向,但需要控制生产成本,适配当前消费者的价格接受度,不能盲目布局高端。

2.商业机会:当前行业处于产能出清、整合加速的阶段,头部企业正在不断收购整合牧场资源,扩大自身规模,手握优质奶源资产的中小牧场,有机会被头部企业收购,获得退出或者合作发展的机会。

3.行业启示:行业下行周期中,规模化、集约化是大趋势,中小生产方需要提前优化自身资产结构,控制负债规模,提升资产质量,才能更好应对周期波动,抓住整合阶段的合作机会。

本文梳理了当前国内原奶牧场行业的发展趋势与核心痛点,可为乳业相关服务商的业务布局提供参考,核心干货整理如下:

1.行业发展趋势:当前原奶行业已经进入下行整合周期,产能出清仍在进行中,头部牧场通过并购不断扩大规模,行业集中度会持续提升,未来会形成更少头部企业主导的市场格局。

2.客户核心痛点:当前绝大多数牧场都面临亏损压力,核心痛点包括四个方面:一是生产成本管控难,利润空间被不断压缩;二是现金流紧张,负债压力大,很多企业短债无法覆盖;三是并购整合后的管理融合难;四是高端奶源的品牌变现难,消费者不买单。

3.业务机会:服务商可以针对上述痛点,开发针对性的解决方案,比如牛群优化管理服务、现金流与负债管控咨询服务、企业并购整合咨询服务、高端奶源品牌营销推广服务等,帮助牧场应对周期压力,挖掘新的增长空间。

本文披露了当前原奶行业的整合趋势与经营痛点,可为乳业相关平台商的运营调整提供参考,核心干货整理如下:

1.行业对平台的核心需求:当前大量中小牧场处于亏损状态,普遍有降低饲料等采购成本、拓展原奶销售渠道、对接产业资本的需求;头部牧场有并购整合咨询、品牌推广、资源对接的需求,平台可以围绕这些需求开发针对性服务。

2.风险规避提示:当前行业整体产能过剩,消费需求疲软,多数企业盈利困难,平台在招商、拓展业务的过程中,需要重点考察入驻企业的现金流健康度与负债水平,规避企业经营风险传导到平台。

3.平台发展机会:当前行业整合加速,大量优质牧场资产处于低价估值状态,平台可以围绕产业整合,搭建资本对接、牧场产权交易、供应链共享等相关服务板块,既可以吸引头部企业客户,也可以满足中小牧场的合作需求,拓展平台的业务边界。

本文记录了国内原料奶行业下行周期中的最新产业动向与暴露的新问题,对产业研究具备较高的参考价值,核心干货整理如下:

1.产业新动向:当前国内原料奶行业已经进入深度调整周期,供大于求的格局已经持续五年,全行业亏损面最高攀升到90%以上,即便头部牧场也出现连续大额亏损,行业一方面通过淘汰低产牛出清产能,另一方面头部乳企主导整合旗下牧场资源,推动行业集中度快速提升。

2.行业新问题:行业产能过剩出清速度远低于预期,虽然全国牛群总数量下降,但奶牛单产提升,总产量仍然保持微增,过剩格局没有改变;头部企业在自身亏损、资金链紧张的情况下推进并购整合,进一步放大了经营风险,同时管理层频繁变动也影响了长期战略的稳定性,这些都是行业下行阶段出现的新问题。

3.商业模式研究参考:头部牧场打造的“全产业链+高端奶源”重资产模式,在下行周期中依然无法避免大额亏损,说明重资产养殖模式在行业周期波动中的抗风险能力存在短板,需要进一步优化,这为研究农业重资产商业模式提供了典型案例。

返回默认

声明:快读内容全程由AI生成,请注意甄别信息。如您发现问题,请发送邮件至 run@ebrun.com 。

我是 品牌商 卖家 工厂 服务商 平台商 研究者 帮我再读一遍。

Quick Summary

This article sheds light on the operating predicament and self-rescue efforts of Modern Dairy, China’s leading raw milk producer, after the domestic raw milk industry entered a downward cycle. Key takeaways are as follows:

1. Current industry status: Since 2021, raw milk has been in oversupply, and prices have continued to decline. The average price of raw milk dropped to 3.06 yuan per kilogram in 2025, even lower than the price of bottled mineral water. At its peak, over 90% of the whole industry was operating at a loss, and the excess capacity has not been fully eliminated.

2. Modern Dairy’s operating performance: As the industry leader, Modern Dairy accumulated a total loss of 2.546 billion yuan over 2024 and 2025, wiping out all 2.526 billion yuan in profits it earned between 2020 and 2023. As of the end of 2025, the company’s interest-bearing debt reached as high as 19.26 billion yuan, with 7.14 billion yuan in short-term debt due within one year. Its total working capital is less than 7 billion yuan, which cannot cover its short-term liabilities, putting enormous pressure on its capital chain.

3. Self-rescue measures: The company has replaced its board chairman twice in just three years. Current chairman Chen Yiyi is a core figure from the Mengniu ecosystem. Modern Dairy is currently acquiring and integrating China Shengmu to expand scale and access high-end milk sources. However, China Shengmu itself has been loss-making for consecutive years, so the outcome of the integration remains unclear.

This article outlines the current development status and consumer trends of China’s raw milk industry, offering reference for business decision-making for dairy brands. Key insights are as follows:

1. Consumer trends and industry environment: Overall consumer demand for dairy in China is declining, with high-end milk consumption losing steam and consumer willingness to pay for "premium milk source" concepts falling. The entire industry has shifted from an expansion phase to a mature downward cycle, with raw milk in oversupply, excess capacity yet to be fully cleared, and a still high industry-wide loss ratio.

2. Reference for product portfolio planning: Even high-end positioned milk sources marketed as "desert organic" have fallen into sustained and widening losses, indicating that high-end product positioning cannot rely on concepts alone. It must align with current mass consumers’ purchasing power and actual demand. Brands need to adjust the pricing and marketing strategies of their high-end product lines to avoid pitfalls.

3. Reference for navigating industry cycles: During the downturn, leading dairy players are integrating internal pasture resources, cutting costs by eliminating low-yield, inefficient capacity, and acquiring high-quality assets at the bottom of the cycle to expand scale and optimize tiered milk source and product structures. This integration approach can serve as a reference for brands to adjust their own milk source layout and product structure to weather cyclical volatility.

This article sorts out the current status, risks and opportunities of the raw milk industry during its downward cycle, offering reference for dairy-related sellers. Key insights are as follows:

1. Risk warning: The current raw milk market is oversupplied, with prices continuing to fall. At its peak, over 90% of the industry was loss-making. While conditions have eased, the loss ratio remains high, excess capacity has not been fully eliminated, and weak demand has intensified price competition risks. Sellers need to prepare in advance and manage operational risks proactively.

2. Opportunity outlook: Leading dairy companies are accelerating the integration of their pasture resources, which will continuously raise industry concentration. Small and medium-sized dairy sellers can pursue cooperation opportunities with leading players to access their supply chain and channel resources and secure room for survival. The industry integration phase also brings opportunities to acquire high-quality assets at depressed valuations for sellers with sufficient capital.

3. Reference for coping strategies: Leading players cut costs by eliminating low-yield, inefficient capacity and cutting capital expenditure, while optimizing cash flow management during the downturn. These practices can be adopted by sellers of all sizes. The core priority is to control debt scale and avoid capital chain rupture caused by excessive short-term debt.

This article sorts out the latest development of China’s raw milk production industry, offering operational reference for raw milk production facilities. Key insights are as follows:

1. Product production and design requirements: Amid current weak market demand and overall raw milk oversupply, cost control is the core competitiveness. Low-yield dairy cows raise production costs and can no longer adapt to market demand, so pastures need to proactively optimize herd structure by culling low-yield cattle. While high-end organic is a viable product differentiation direction, producers must control production costs to match current consumers’ price acceptance, and avoid blind expansion into the high-end segment.

2. Business opportunities: The industry is currently in a phase of capacity clearance and accelerated integration, with leading players continuously acquiring and integrating pasture resources to expand scale. Small and medium-sized pastures holding high-quality milk source assets have opportunities to be acquired by leading enterprises, enabling an exit path or cooperative development.

3. Industry takeaways: Scale and intensification are the overriding trend during the industry downturn. Small and medium-sized producers need to optimize their asset structure, control debt levels, and improve asset quality in advance to better navigate cyclical volatility and seize cooperation opportunities during the integration phase.

This article sorts out the development trends and core pain points of China’s raw milk pasture industry, offering reference for business layout for dairy-related service providers. Key insights are as follows:

1. Industry development trends: The raw milk industry has entered a downward integration cycle, with capacity clearance still ongoing. Leading pastures are expanding scale through mergers and acquisitions, which will continuously increase industry concentration, leading to a future market structure dominated by a smaller number of leading players.

2. Core customer pain points: The vast majority of pastures currently face loss pressure, with four core pain points: first, difficulty controlling production costs amid continuously shrinking profit margins; second, tight cash flow and heavy debt pressure, with many enterprises unable to cover maturing short-term debt; third, difficulty achieving management integration after mergers and acquisitions; fourth, difficulty monetizing high-end milk source brands, as consumers are unwilling to pay premium for concepts.

3. Business opportunities: Service providers can develop targeted solutions addressing the above pain points, such as herd optimization management services, cash flow and debt management consulting, M&A integration consulting, and high-end milk source brand marketing services, to help pastures weather cyclical pressure and unlock new growth space.

This article outlines the integration trends and operational pain points of the current raw milk industry, offering reference for operational adjustments for dairy-related platform operators. Key insights are as follows:

1. Core industry demands for platforms: A large number of small and medium-sized pastures are currently loss-making, with widespread demand for lower procurement costs for feed and other inputs, expanded raw milk sales channels, and access to industrial capital. Leading pastures need M&A consulting, brand promotion, and resource matching services. Platforms can develop targeted offerings around these demands.

2. Risk mitigation tips: Amid overall industry overcapacity, weak consumer demand, and widespread unprofitability, platforms need to prioritize examining the cash flow health and debt levels of prospective onboarding enterprises during business expansion and recruitment, to avoid spillover of enterprise operating risk to the platform.

3. Platform development opportunities: With accelerated industry integration, a large number of high-quality pasture assets are currently undervalued. Platforms can build relevant service segments around industry integration, such as capital matching, pasture property rights trading, and shared supply chain services. This will attract both leading enterprise clients and meet the cooperation needs of small and medium-sized pastures, expanding the platform’s business scope.

This article documents the latest industry developments and emerging issues in China’s raw milk industry during the downward cycle, offering high reference value for industrial research. Key insights are as follows:

1. New industry developments: China’s raw milk industry has entered a deep adjustment cycle, and the oversupply pattern has persisted for five years. The industry-wide loss ratio peaked at over 90%, and even leading pastures have posted consecutive large losses. On one hand, the industry is clearing capacity by culling low-yield cows; on the other hand, leading dairy enterprises are leading the integration of pasture resources, driving a rapid increase in industry concentration.

2. New emerging industry issues: The pace of excess capacity clearance has been far slower than expected. Although the total national herd size has declined, higher milk yield per cow has kept total output growing slightly, leaving the oversupply pattern unchanged. Leading enterprises are pursuing M&A integration while facing their own losses and tight capital chains, which further amplifies operational risk. Meanwhile, frequent management changes undermine the stability of long-term strategy. All these are new issues emerging during the industry downturn.

3. Reference for business model research: The "whole industry chain + high-end milk source" asset-heavy model adopted by leading pastures still cannot avoid large losses during the downturn, indicating that asset-heavy breeding models have shortcomings in anti-cyclical risk resistance that require further optimization. This provides a typical case for research on asset-heavy agricultural business models.

Disclaimer: The "Quick Summary" content is entirely generated by AI. Please exercise discretion when interpreting the information. For issues or corrections, please email run@ebrun.com .

I am a Brand Seller Factory Service Provider Marketplace Seller Researcher Read it again.

餐桌上的一杯奶,背后牵动着牧场、饲料、繁育、冷链等一整条产业链。而当人们喝奶的需求降低,压力会很快传导到牧场端。

自2021年以来,原料奶市场供大于求,行业进入下行周期,原料奶价格一降再降,到2025年时原料奶均价已低至3.06元/公斤,甚至不如一瓶矿泉水的价格。

即便是伊利和蒙牛两大乳业巨头旗下的牧场优然牧业、现代牧业都在加大力度淘汰低产牛,但仍陷入了“越卖越亏”的困境。

其中,尤以现代牧业亏损规模最大。2024年和2025年,现代牧业的权益股东应占利润两年累亏25.46亿元,远超优然牧业同期亏损总额11.23亿元。

在关键时刻,大股东蒙牛开始出手——将全资附属公司Start Great所持中国圣牧24.9%股权表决权授予现代牧业,并由现代牧业出面收购中国圣牧1.28%股权。

现代牧业试图整合中国圣牧的“沙漠有机”高端奶源,但问题在于,中国圣牧本身也面临着营收下滑、利润亏损的尴尬境地,人们似乎也并不愿意再为高端“买单”。

可以说,摆在现代牧业新任董事会主席陈易一面前的,不只是一次简单的并购整合,更是一场“利润保卫战”。

01 吞下圣牧,“沙漠有机”也不挣钱

和牧场龙头优然牧业相比,现代牧业属于“后来者”。

2005年9月领先牧业注册成立,开始经营乳牛畜牧业务。次年,公司第一个乳牛场在安徽省马鞍山运作。当时,领先牧业最大的标签是「蒙牛原料奶供应商」。

现代牧业2010年在港股上市时发布的全球发售资料显示,直到2008年,现代牧业才在开曼群岛注册成立,此后又透过一系列股权转让,收购了领先牧业的所有资产、业务及营运附属公司。

2013年至2017年,蒙牛陆续完成了对现代牧业的控股。成立至今,现代牧业构建了“从一粒种到一杯奶”的全产业链,日产鲜奶超1万吨,市场占有率10%。

和现代牧业的地位相似,中国圣牧也是蒙牛的子公司。截至2026年5月22日,蒙牛通过全资附属公司Start Great持有中国圣牧29.99%股权,为其单一第一大股东。

可以看到,在现代牧业收购中国圣牧股权的过程中,蒙牛的身影一直存在。

根据现代牧业、Start Great与蒙牛签订的协议,Start Great将所持中国圣牧24.9%股权对应的表决权不可撤销地授予现代牧业,并放弃行使剩余股权对应的表决权(特殊情况除外)。

2026年5月22日,现代牧业完成收购中国圣牧约1.28%股权,代价为3752万港元。至此,现代牧业及其一致行动人Start Great合计持有中国圣牧31.26%股权,触发强制全面现金要约收购。

而早在2026年5月7日,现代牧业要约收购中国圣牧股权已取得国家市场监督管理总局的反垄断批准,意味着这场交易的外部障碍已扫清。

那么,现代牧业为何选择此时出手?

自2021年以来,原料奶的价格一降再降,现代牧业也无法逃脱外界环境影响。2025年,其原奶售价为3.33元/公斤,同比下滑7.7%;而原奶的销售成本达到2.32元/公斤,每斤毛利几乎只剩5毛。

而中国圣牧依托乌兰布和沙漠的自然地缘优势,奶源主打“沙漠有机”,走高端路线。2025年,中国圣牧原奶的销售价格为3.875元/公斤,明显售价更高。

不仅如此,截至2026年6月15日,中国圣牧的收盘价只剩0.335港元/股,同样处于历史低点,也无形中降低了收购成本。

据现代牧业披露,双方交易完成后,合并后的牛群总规模预计将超过61万头,合并后的年原奶产量将超过400万吨,产量直追“行业第一”优然牧业。

这也意味着,通过这场收购,现代牧业既能扩大规模、提高原奶产量,又能扩充高端奶源,还能抄底优质牧场股权,可谓是一举多得。

但问题在于,中国圣牧本身的业绩压力也将传导至现代牧业。

2024年和2025年,中国圣牧的销售收入分别为31.26亿元和30.12亿元,分别同比下滑7.61%、3.64%;母公司拥有人应占利润则分别亏损了6549.5万元、3.73亿元,亏损有扩大之势。

在这种情况下,中国圣牧又如何反哺现代牧业?

02 2年累亏超25亿,资金链紧张

现代牧业出手收购中国圣牧,与其说是一场进攻,不如说是一次被逼到墙角的“自救”。

从2024年开始,现代牧业的业绩就明显承压。2024年,公司实现销售收入132.54亿元,同比下滑1.5%,这是2018年来销售收入首次出现下滑。

到了2025年,现代牧业的销售收入继续下挫4.9%,降至126.01亿元。其中,生鲜奶在多卖了24.6万吨的情况下,勉强维持了原料奶收入的平稳,但受市场需求疲弱影响,养殖综合解决方案业务收入同比减少23.8%至21.35亿元。

在市场需求疲软之下,现代牧业已经在采取一系列措施来节流降本。例如,加大力度淘汰低产牛,2025年末的畜群规模为45.69万头,较2024年底减少约3.4万头;生物资产同比减少9.4%至112.7亿元。

此外,原奶的饲料成本同比下滑9.2%,带动整体销售成本同比下滑8.3%至2.32元/公斤;资本开支同比下滑29.3%至24.42亿元。

即便如此,利润还是不可避免地滑向亏损。2024年和2025年,公司权益股东应占利润分别亏损了14.17亿元、11.29亿元,两年累亏高达25.46亿元,基本将2020年至2023年这4年积累的利润(25.26亿元)全部吞噬。

放在行业中来看,现代牧业的亏损规模也是罕见的。

以全球最大的原料奶供应商优然牧业为例,2023年,公司拥有人应占亏损达到10.50亿元,此后两年又分别亏损了6.91亿元、4.32亿元,三年累计亏损21.73亿元,仍然低于现代牧业近2年的亏损总额。

连续亏损之后,现代牧业的资金链已经趋于紧张。

截至2025年末,现代牧业有息借款总额高达192.6亿元,同比大涨33.2%,其中一年内到期借款达到71.4亿元。同期,其短期银行结余、金融资产等流动资金合计不足70亿元,已无法覆盖短债。

现代牧业的杠杆在加码,风险也在累积。于2025年末,其资产负债比率同比增加5.9个百分点至73.2%,已经反超优然牧业(72.05%);净有息借款比率同比增加4.4个百分点至53.6%。

资金链承压之下,现代牧业要约收购中国圣牧的资金压力也是显而易见的。

按照计划,现代牧业要约收购中国圣牧的价格为0.35港元/股,涉及要约收购股份为57.61亿股,最高总代价约20.16亿港元。

那么,要约收购中国圣牧的资金从何而来?如何缓解自身资金链压力?蒙牛是否会出手帮助缓解资金压力?在中国圣牧本就亏损的情况下,要约收购之后是否会进一步拖累自身利润表现?在收购中国圣牧之后,蒙牛对两大牧场有何安排、调整?

对此,「子弹财经」试图向现代牧业方面进行了解,但截至发稿仍未获回复。

03 3年更换2任董事会主席,管理层动荡

业绩层面所承受的压力,已经传导至管理层——短短3年时间,现代牧业的董事会主席就更换了2任。

2023年2月,在位6年的卢敏放因工作职责分工调整,卸任现代牧业董事会主席之职,由赵杰军接任。卢敏放曾历任蒙牛的总裁、副董事长等职,正是在他的主导下,蒙牛完成了对现代牧业的控股,以及拿下中国圣牧的单一最大股东之位。

然而,赵杰军上位“一把手”仅2年半,2025年9月便以“个人健康”为由辞任,改任子公司专家顾问,由陈易一接任董事会主席之位。

2021年12月,陈易一加入蒙牛,担任蒙牛集团副总裁,负责战略和投资管理。在此之前,陈易一曾先后任职于雀巢、华润创业、皇氏集团等知名企业,在快消品乳业及零售业方面拥有丰富经验。

此外,陈易一还担任中国圣牧董事会主席、妙可蓝多董事会主席,是蒙牛在乳业上下游产业链上的关键人物。

陈易一上任后,现代牧业的人事调整并未停止。据「子弹财经」不完全统计,2025年9月以来,公司的非执行董事、提名委员会成员、可持续发展委员会主席、薪酬委员会成员等职位相继发生更迭。

只是,董事会主席频繁变更,如何保证长期战略的执行?为何此时如此密集的调整管理团队?是否控股股东蒙牛对业绩提出了不满?预计何时才能扭亏?

对此,「子弹财经」试图向现代牧业方面进行了解,但截至发稿仍未获回复。

客观来看,新管理层接手的绝非一个轻松的摊子。

农业农村部、华创证券资料,2024年以来,由于行业奶价承压,行业亏损面曾飙升到90%以上的高位。进入2025年后,随着饲料成本压力缓解以及散奶和固体乳价格环比回升,亏损面虽逐步缩小,但亏损比例依旧偏高。

面对亏损的压力,牧场在加速淘汰低产牛,2025年全国牛群数量同比下降27.7万头至592万头。但奶牛反而更加高产,2025年全国原料奶产量4091万吨,同比略增0.3%,行业产能过剩仍未完全出清。

奶价尚未回升之时,负债率高企、资金链紧绷、拟要约收购的中国圣牧自身也在亏损泥潭中挣扎……而化解这些难题的重任,都落在了陈易一的肩上。

只是,在原料奶下行周期里,现代牧业的这场“利润保卫战”,或许比想象中更难打。

注:文/王亚静,文章来源:子弹财经,本文为作者独立观点,不代表亿邦动力立场。

文章来源:子弹财经

广告
微信
朋友圈

这么好看,分享一下?

朋友圈 分享

APP内打开

+1
+1
微信好友 朋友圈 新浪微博 QQ空间
关闭
收藏成功
发送
/140 0