广告
加载中

深向科技造车 供应商赚钱?

魏帅 2026-06-12 12:51
魏帅 2026/06/12 12:51

邦小白快读

EN
全文速览

本文核心介绍了百度与狮桥集团联手孵化的智能重卡新势力深向科技,二次冲击港交所IPO的发展现状与核心问题,核心干货如下

1. 核心业绩:深向科技成立三年营收从4.26亿元飙升至39.61亿元,规模扩大近9倍,2025年新能源重卡交付量突破8000辆,同比增长167%,经营性现金流转正至8.35亿元,初步具备自我造血能力;但三年累计净亏损达17.13亿元,2025年毛利率仅4.9%,远低于行业10%-20%的平均水平,增收不增利问题突出。

2. 现存问题与未来规划:深向采用轻资产代工模式快速量产,但供应链高度集中,对供应商依赖度高,成本被严重挤压;目前正推进自建三电智慧工厂,将核心零部件转为自研自产,计划优化供应链提升毛利率,走先落地L2智驾造血、数据反哺L4研发的路径。

深向科技的发展路径和遇到的问题,对新能源商用车品牌的经营发展具备较强的参考价值,核心干货如下

1. 行业趋势观察:当前新能源重卡渗透率已突破30%,行业竞争已经从早期抢占份额转向全生命周期成本、生态协同的马拉松体系竞争,单纯性能比拼已经过时,竞争核心是帮客户降低全生命周期使用成本,全产业链生态服务能力成为核心竞争力。

2. 产品研发可借鉴路径:深向采用正向定义+软硬件一体化的研发策略,先大规模落地L2级智驾获取现金流和真实运营数据,再反哺L4级智驾研发,形成数据飞轮效应,同时依托百度现成技术沉淀降低研发门槛,缩短验证周期,该路径适配智能商用车研发。

3. 风险启示:轻资产代工模式虽然扩张快,但会导致供应链掌控力弱,利润被上游挤压,品牌需要尽早掌握核心零部件自研能力,才能稳定盈利空间,应对行业价格战。

当前新能源重卡赛道进入白热化淘汰赛阶段,相关从业者可从深向科技的发展中获得机会提示与风险参考,核心干货如下

1. 市场机会判断:新能源重卡属于万亿级公路货运市场,当前仍处于增长阶段,作为生产资料,客户对全生命周期降本的需求明确,带补能、金融、管理的一体化解决方案更受市场青睐,细分增长空间充足。

2. 可学习的商业模式:深向采用跨界整合资源+轻资产代工的模式,快速规避重资产投入和资质审批周期,仅用两年半就实现量产;走“沿途下蛋”的商业闭环,用L2车型销售的现金流和数据反哺高端研发,该模式适配智能重卡创业。

3. 风险提示:当前行业价格战激烈,传统主机厂依托供应链优势占据市场主导,供应链高度集中会带来交付和成本风险,低毛利率模式抗风险能力弱,从业者需要尽早布局核心能力,优化供应链结构,提升盈利空间。

深向科技的发展,对整车及零部件工厂带来了新的商业机会,也提供了转型发展的启示,核心干货如下

1. 产品生产设计需求:当前新能源重卡市场要求产品适配干线物流场景,核心方向是降低全生命周期使用成本,智能化、网联化是核心设计趋势,占整车成本60%的三电核心零部件的性能和成本,直接决定整车产品竞争力。

2. 可对接的商业机会:深向科技目前仅将核心三电转为自研自产,其余零部件仍依赖外部供应商,给有技术、产能的零部件工厂带来了合作订单机会;早期深向采用代工模式,给有闲置产能的老牌整车厂带来代工订单增量,拓展了营收来源。

3. 转型发展启示:新能源重卡对智能化功能需求越来越高,工厂需要跟进自动驾驶、智能网联相关的生产技术升级,适配新品牌的定制化生产需求,才能获得长期稳定的合作,跟上产业电动化智能化的转型趋势。

新能源重卡行业的发展变化,衍生出很多新的客户痛点和市场机会,对相关服务商来说核心干货如下

1. 行业发展趋势:当前新能源重卡已经从早期的政策驱动转向市场化生态竞争,赛道渗透率突破30%,竞争已经升级为整车+核心零部件+补能+运营服务的全产业链竞争,智能化升级需求持续释放,对第三方技术和运营服务的需求不断增长。

2. 核心客户痛点:智能重卡新势力的核心痛点是供应链成本高、议价能力弱,缺少足够的技术积累和商用车场景资源;重卡终端客户的核心痛点是全生命周期使用成本高,需要成熟的降本增效解决方案。

3. 市场机会方向:服务商可以围绕智能驾驶算法、供应链整合、全链路运营管理等方向输出解决方案,对接新势力品牌降本、智能化升级的需求,也可以对接终端物流客户降本增效的需求,拓展To B的商用车智能化服务市场,当前市场增量空间充足。

深向科技等智能重卡新势力的发展需求,为产业平台带来了新的方向,核心干货如下

1. 品牌对平台的核心需求:早期智能重卡新势力普遍采用轻资产代工模式,核心需求包括:一是需要代工生产平台提供产能支持,解决自身没有工厂的问题;二是需要供应链对接平台,帮助分散供应商集中度,降低采购成本;三是需要资本平台对接融资,支撑规模化扩张。

2. 平台可布局的方向:平台可以针对新势力的痛点,搭建新能源商用车供应链整合服务平台,对接品牌与优质代工厂、零部件供应商,帮助分散供应链风险;也可以围绕重卡补能、运营、金融等需求搭建产业服务生态平台,吸引车企入驻,打造网络效应。

3. 风向规避提示:当前新能源重卡行业价格战激烈,多数新势力仍处于亏损状态,平台招商合作需要优先考察企业的现金流健康度和清晰的降本路径,警惕供应链集中带来的系统性风险,规避高风险项目。

深向科技作为智能重卡赛道的代表性新势力,其发展路径反映了产业最新动向,对产业研究具备较高的样本价值,核心干货如下

1. 产业新动向:当前新能源重卡赛道已经进入淘汰赛阶段,渗透率突破30%,行业竞争从单一产品竞争转向全产业链生态竞争,跨界整合投资方资源+轻资产代工+数据驱动研发,成为智能重卡新势力区别于传统企业的新型商业模式,“先电动化后智能化,沿途下蛋”的研发路径已经初步验证了可行性。

2. 产业新问题:轻资产代工模式虽然能实现快速扩张,但存在供应链集中度高、品牌对上游议价能力弱、毛利率长期偏低的问题,增收不增利是智能重卡新势力普遍面临的窘境,资本市场对未盈利的新势力模式认可度存疑,冲击IPO存在较大不确定性。

3. 值得研究的新课题:核心零部件自研自产能否有效提升毛利率,打破供应商掣肘,“数据驱动+先落地造血”的智驾研发模式能否最终跑通,跨界整合模式是否具备行业可复制性,都是当前新能源商用车产业值得深入研究的新问题。

返回默认

声明:快读内容全程由AI生成,请注意甄别信息。如您发现问题,请发送邮件至 run@ebrun.com 。

我是 品牌商 卖家 工厂 服务商 平台商 研究者 帮我再读一遍。

Quick Summary

This article focuses on Shenxiang Technology, an intelligent heavy-truck startup incubated by Baidu and Lionbridge Group, and outlines its current development standing and core challenges as it makes its second attempt at an IPO on the Hong Kong Stock Exchange. Key takeaways are as follows:

1. Core performance: Founded three years ago, Shenxiang’s revenue has surged from RMB 426 million to RMB 3.961 billion, an almost nine-fold increase in scale. Its new energy heavy truck deliveries are projected to exceed 8,000 units in 2025, representing a 167% year-on-year growth. Operating cash flow has turned positive at RMB 835 million, indicating the company has初步 developed self-sustainability. However, cumulative net losses over three years reached RMB 1.713 billion, and its gross margin stood at only 4.9% in 2025, far below the industry average of 10% to 20%, making revenue growth without profit a prominent issue.

2. Existing challenges and future plans: Shenxiang adopted an asset-light OEM model to achieve rapid mass production, but this leaves it with highly concentrated supply chains, heavy reliance on suppliers, and severely compressed profit margins. The company is now building an in-house smart three-electric (battery, motor, electronic control) factory to bring core components in-house for R&D and production, with plans to optimize its supply chain to raise gross margins. It follows a path of commercializing L2 autonomous driving first to generate cash flow, then use accumulated operating data to feed back into L4 R&D.

Shenxiang Technology’s growth path and current challenges offer valuable reference for new energy commercial vehicle brand operations and development. Key insights are as follows:

1. Industry trend observation: New energy heavy truck penetration has now exceeded 30%, and industry competition has shifted from early-stage market share grabbing to a marathon focused on total cost of ownership and ecosystem collaboration. Pure performance competition is outdated; the core of competition now lies in helping customers cut total life-cycle costs, and full-industry-chain ecological service capabilities have become the core competitiveness.

2. Transferable product R&D path: Shenxiang adopts a R&D strategy of forward product definition plus integrated software and hardware development. It first deploys L2 intelligent driving at scale to generate cash flow and collect real-world operating data, then uses these resources to advance L4 R&D, forming a data flywheel effect. It also leverages Baidu’s existing technology reserves to lower R&D barriers and shorten validation cycles — a path well-suited for intelligent commercial vehicle development.

3. Risk takeaways: While the asset-light OEM model enables fast expansion, it leads to weak supply chain control and allows upstream players to squeeze profit margins. Brands need to build in-house R&D capabilities for core components as early as possible to secure stable profit margins and withstand industry price wars.

The new energy heavy truck track is now in a white-hot elimination phase, and industry practitioners can draw insights on opportunities and risks from Shenxiang Technology’s development. Key takeaways are as follows:

1. Market opportunity assessment: New energy heavy trucks operate in the trillion RMB road freight market and remain in a growth stage. As a means of production, customers have clear demand for total life-cycle cost reduction, and integrated solutions that include energy replenishment, financing and fleet management are particularly favored by the market, leaving abundant room for growth in market segments.

2. Adaptable business model: Shenxiang uses a cross-industry resource integration plus asset-light OEM model, which quickly avoids heavy asset investment and long qualification approval cycles, enabling mass production in just two and a half years. It follows a "cash flow along the way" closed business cycle, using cash flow and data from L2 vehicle sales to support advanced R&D — a model well-suited for intelligent heavy truck startups.

3. Risk warnings: The industry is currently experiencing fierce price wars, and traditional OEMs dominate the market relying on supply chain advantages. Highly concentrated supply chains expose players to delivery and cost risks, and low gross margin models have weak risk resilience. Practitioners need to lay out core capabilities as early as possible, optimize supply chain structure, and expand profit margins.

Shenxiang Technology’s growth brings new commercial opportunities and transformation insights for finished vehicle and component factories. Key takeaways are as follows:

1. Product and design requirements: The current new energy heavy truck market requires products adapted for long-haul logistics, with a core focus on reducing total life-cycle costs. Intelligence and connectivity are the core design trends, and the performance and cost of three-electric core components — which account for 60% of total vehicle cost — directly determine a vehicle’s competitiveness.

2. Accessible commercial opportunities: Shenxiang is only bringing core three-electric components in-house for R&D and production, and still relies on external suppliers for other components, creating order and partnership opportunities for component factories with mature technology and available production capacity. In its early stage, Shenxiang’s OEM model also added order volume for established OEMs with idle capacity, expanding their revenue sources.

3. Transformation insights: Demand for intelligent features in new energy heavy trucks is growing steadily. Factories need to upgrade production technologies for autonomous driving and intelligent connectivity to meet the customized production requirements of new brands, in order to secure long-term stable cooperation and keep pace with the industry’s electrification and intelligent transformation trend.

The evolution of the new energy heavy truck industry has created new customer pain points and market opportunities for related service providers. Key takeaways are as follows:

1. Industry development trends: New energy heavy trucks have shifted from early policy-driven growth to market-oriented ecosystem competition, with penetration exceeding 30%. Competition has now upgraded to full-industry-chain competition covering finished vehicles, core components, energy replenishment and operation services. Demand for intelligent upgrading continues to grow, driving rising demand for third-party technology and operation services.

2. Core customer pain points: The main pain points for new intelligent heavy truck startups are high supply chain costs, weak bargaining power, and insufficient technology accumulation and commercial vehicle scenario resources. For end-users, the core pain point is high total life-cycle ownership cost, and there is strong demand for mature cost reduction and efficiency improvement solutions.

3. Promising market opportunity directions: Service providers can develop solutions centered on autonomous driving algorithms, supply chain integration, and end-to-end operation management to meet the cost reduction and intelligent upgrading needs of startup brands, as well as the cost reduction and efficiency improvement needs of end logistics customers. This opens up abundant growth room in the expanding B2B intelligent commercial vehicle service market.

The development needs of new intelligent heavy truck startups like Shenxiang Technology have opened up new directions for industrial platforms. Key takeaways are as follows:

1. Core demand from brands: Early-stage intelligent heavy truck startups generally adopt asset-light OEM models, and their core demands include three main areas: first, production capacity support from OEM platforms to solve the problem of not owning their own factories; second, supply chain connection platforms to help diversify supplier concentration and lower procurement costs; third, access to capital platforms to secure financing that supports large-scale expansion.

2. High-potential layout directions for platforms: Platforms can address startups’ pain points by building a new energy commercial vehicle supply chain integration service platform that connects brands with high-quality OEMs and component suppliers, helping to diversify supply chain risks. They can also build industrial ecological service platforms centered on heavy truck energy replenishment, operation and financing needs to attract automakers to settle in and build network effects.

3. Risk avoidance guidance: The new energy heavy truck industry is currently experiencing intense price wars, and most startups remain unprofitable. When attracting partners, platforms should prioritize evaluating companies’ cash flow health and clear cost reduction paths, guard against systemic risks caused by concentrated supply chains, and avoid high-risk projects.

As a representative startup in the intelligent heavy truck track, Shenxiang Technology’s growth path reflects the latest industry trends and offers high sample value for industrial research. Key insights are as follows:

1. New industry trends: The new energy heavy truck track has now entered the elimination phase, with penetration exceeding 30%. Industry competition has shifted from single-product competition to full-industry-chain ecosystem competition. A new business model that combines cross-industry investor resource integration, asset-light OEM production and data-driven R&D has emerged for intelligent heavy truck startups, distinguishing them from traditional players. The "electrification first, followed by intelligence, with cash flow generated along the way" R&D path has now been preliminarily validated as feasible.

2. New emerging industry problems: While the asset-light OEM model enables rapid expansion, it leads to high supply chain concentration, weak upstream bargaining power for brands, and persistently low gross margins. Revenue growth without profit is a common dilemma for new intelligent heavy truck startups, and capital market recognition for unprofitable startup models remains uncertain, creating high uncertainty around IPO attempts.

3. New research topics worthy of investigation: Key open questions that merit in-depth research in the new energy commercial vehicle industry include: Can in-house R&D and production of core components effectively raise gross margins and eliminate supplier constraints? Can the "data-driven + commercialize first to generate cash flow" autonomous driving R&D model ultimately prove viable? And is the cross-industry integration model replicable across the industry?

Disclaimer: The "Quick Summary" content is entirely generated by AI. Please exercise discretion when interpreting the information. For issues or corrections, please email run@ebrun.com .

I am a Brand Seller Factory Service Provider Marketplace Seller Researcher Read it again.

距离首次递表失效仅仅过去半年,2026年5月,深向科技再次向港交所递交了主板上市申请。

作为百度与狮桥集团联手孵化的智能重卡新势力,这家被外界冠以“卡车界特斯拉”光环的企业,正试图用一份颇具爆发力的“二次答卷”来重新叩响资本市场的大门。

翻开其更新后的招股书,短短三年间,公司营收从2023年的4.26亿元一路飙升至2025年的39.61亿元,规模扩张近9倍,更迎来了至关重要的现金流拐点——经营性现金流首次转正至8.35亿元。

这标志着,这家曾经疯狂烧钱的造车新势力,其主营业务终于具备了初步的自我“造血”能力。

然而,在这份充满荷尔蒙的增长成绩单背后,深向科技依然面临着严峻的盈利大考。

2023年至2025年的报告期内,深向科技累计净亏损高达17.13亿元,2025年整体毛利率仅为4.9%。

在重资产、重成本的新能源汽车制造业,不足5%的毛利率意味着卖车本身几乎是在“赔本赚吆喝”,微薄的利润空间被上游供应链严重挤压。

这种“增收不增利”的财务窘境,以及高度依赖外部代工的供应链模式,成为了其冲击IPO道路上最大的悬念。

随着行业竞争进入白热化的“淘汰赛”阶段,深向科技究竟能否打破被供应商“扼住咽喉”的被动局面,把技术优势转化为实实在在的盈利能力,将是决定其能否在万亿级公路货运市场中真正站稳脚跟的生死之战。

1

业绩冰火两重天

深向科技交出的这份三年财务答卷,呈现出一种“冰火两重天”态势。

“火”的一面,是其核心业务展现出了惊人的爆发式增长势能。

报告期内,公司营收从4.26亿元一路狂飙至39.61亿元,三年时间里实现了近9倍的规模扩张;新能源重卡交付量在2025年强势突破8000辆大关,同比激增167%。重卡销量的激增,也是企业营收实现规模化扩张的关键所在。

经营活动产生的现金流量净额也首次由负转正,达到8.35亿元。这一关键指标的逆转,标志着深向科技的主营业务终于告别了单纯依靠外部融资输血的阶段,初步具备了自我“造血”的生存能力,商业化进程正式从“高投入扩张”迈向了“高效率运营”的新周期。

然而,在光鲜亮丽的营收与交付数据背后,深向科技的盈利状况却处于“冰点”。

数据显示,公司净亏损分别为3.89亿元、6.75亿元、6.49亿元,三年累计亏损超17.13亿元,尽管亏损率有所收窄,但绝对金额依然庞大,仍身处亏损的泥潭。

且根据招股书,公司预计2026年仍将录得净亏损。

毛利率方面,整体呈持续上升趋势。报告期内,公司毛利分别为180万元、980万元、1.95亿元,整体毛利率从0.4%、0.5%提升至4.9%。

但需要警惕的是,发展至今,深向科技毛利率仍处于5%以下的水平,通常汽车行业的毛利率普遍在10%-20%之间,这在激烈的市场竞争中显然不够看。

这种“增收不增利”的财务窘境,与深向科技独特的发展战略密切相关。

为了在激烈的市场竞争中快速抢占份额,深向科技早期采取轻资产代工模式,将正向定义的纯电重卡快速推向市场。

深向科技在接受「创业最前线」采访时表示,公司采用正向定义+软硬件一体化+渐进式路径的战略打法。在RoboTruck赛道中,先以L2大规模落地实现自我造血,用销售车辆的现金流和真实数据反哺研发,形成“沿途下蛋”的商业闭环。大规模交付的L2重卡,在真实运营场景中积累了海量数据,形成数据飞轮效应,驱动L4持续进化——这正是特斯拉验证过的成功路径。

在深向科技看来,每一台卖出去的重卡不仅是运输工具,更是24小时不间断工作的数据采集终端。卖车获取的毛利虽然微薄,但车辆在实际货运场景中产生的海量规划与控制数据,却是训练下一代自动驾驶算法最宝贵的燃料。

但在制造业的现实中,微薄的毛利让其供应链极其脆弱——一旦上游成本波动或销量不及预期,这种脆弱的盈利模型将面临巨大挑战。

持续扩大的亏损和极低的毛利率,不仅反映了公司在产能爬坡期高昂的研发与运营成本,更成为了其冲击IPO道路上最大的悬念——资本市场是否愿意为这个尚未完全兑现的“数据闭环”故事持续买单,将是深向科技能否成功上市的关键。

2

被供应商“扼住咽喉”

相比其他早期的智能重卡创业公司,深向科技的商业模式核心,可以高度概括为“顶级资源的跨界整合”与“轻资产代工的快速突围”。

这种模式让它在成立短短几年内,就从一个PPT上的概念,迅速成长为年营收近40亿元的行业黑马。

资源来自深向科技颇具“背景”的投资人。除了创始人万钧背后的狮桥集团,另一创始股东百度已经为这个企业注入了底层基因。

作为战略投资方,深向科技获得了百度Apollo在商用车领域唯一的“白盒”自动驾驶技术授权。这意味着深向拿到的不是封装好的黑盒子接口,而是底层源代码和核心知识产权。

这让它能够直接复用百度十余年的技术沉淀,并根据重卡干线物流的特定场景进行深度定制和优化,极大地降低了研发门槛,缩短了技术验证周期。

创始人万钧则将狮桥深耕多年的商用车产业链资源注入了深向。狮桥不仅带来了覆盖全国的物流场景和卡车司机的运营数据,还提供了成熟的车辆金融、售后服务和风控模型。这让深向科技跳出了纯技术团队的“实验室思维”,更接近物流行业降本增效的真实痛点。

这种跨界融合的背景,让深向科技从诞生之初就跳出了传统造车企业“唯技术论”的窠臼,转而形成了“商业价值优先、数据驱动终局”的战略打法。

在量产制造环节,深向科技的打法选择了类似早期“蔚小理”的“无工厂模式”,即由江淮汽车、山东雷驰等老牌车企进行车辆定制与代工,自身则保留对车辆工程、系统架构及核心零部件的控制权。

这种模式的“红利”非常直观。首先就是快速规避了传统车企动辄百亿的建厂重资产投入和漫长的资质审批周期。仅用两年半时间,深向科技就实现了首款车型“深向星辰”的量产交付。

但直接的问题就是缺乏独立生产能力,致使企业对供应链的掌控力极弱。

招股书显示,报告期内,深向科技来自五大供应商的采购金额分别为8.39亿元、33.72亿元及69.03亿元,占各年度期间总采购金额的88.1%、92.3%和79.4%。同期,最大供应商的采购金额分别为6.08亿元、22.30亿元及23.36亿元,占各年度期间总采购金额的63.8%、61.0%和26.9%。

在风险提示中,深向科技也坦言,若供应商未能按协议方式、质量及时履行各自义务,导致原材料及组件供应不足或延迟,可能阻碍车辆生产,进而对新能源重卡解决方案的销售及交付造成不利影响。

若供应商选择终止与公司的合作关系,转而与竞争对手建立合作,公司将面临合作关系延续的不确定性,且可能无法及时以商业上可接受的条款找到合适替代方案。“一旦这些供应商出现经营问题或调整合作策略,深向科技的供应链将面临巨大冲击,甚至可能影响到整个生产活动的正常进行。”分析人士指出。

整车制造高度依赖外部,导致深向在面对上游时几乎没有谈判筹码,成本控制处处受制于人,这也是其整体毛利率长期徘徊在个位数的核心原因之一。

更关键的是,车辆的交付节奏、批次质量完全受制于代工厂的产能弹性和品控水平,一旦合作方出现产能受限或战略转向,深向的业务根基将面临直接冲击。

另一方面,供应商高度集中也可能导致企业在技术创新和产品升级上受到限制。因为供应商的技术和生产能力在很大程度上决定了企业的产品水平,如果供应商无法及时提供新技术或新产品,企业就难以在市场上保持竞争力。

深向科技回复「创业最前线」的采访中也提到供应链与规模化的提升对于产品毛利率提升的重要性。深向科技方面表示,将通过垂直整合实现物料清单(或BOM)削减,产品组合优化、海外市场溢价、规模经济及供应链优化进一步支持利润率扩张。

3

在红海竞争中突围

当前新能源重卡行业的竞争,已经从早期的“政策驱动”和“抢占先机”,全面转向了以全生命周期成本、技术路线适配、生态协同与商业模式为核心的“马拉松式”体系竞争。

随着渗透率突破30%,赛道竞争也日益拥挤。

传统主机厂为了争夺那有限的市场份额,手段尽出,将中标价格压至物料清单成本红线以下已非罕见现象。

目前,中国重汽、一汽解放、东风商用车等依托深厚的供应链体系和客户基础,快速推出覆盖纯电、混动、氢能三大路线的车型,占据市场主导地位。徐工机械、三一重工等机械系则凭借在工程机械领域的先发优势和电动化经验,保持紧跟态势。

单纯的车辆性能比拼已成过去式,现在的竞争已经升级为“整车+核心部件+基础设施+运营服务”的全产业链生态竞争。

据深向科技介绍称,灼识咨询数据显示,在假定五年的全生命周期内,深向科技的重卡产品相比燃油卡车和油改电卡车,成本分别降低22.8%和10.8%,经济性优势贯穿产品全生命周期。

据悉,深向科技已经构建了覆盖车联网管理及补能支持的全面公路货运服务生态系统,为客户提供一站式解决方案,形成网络效应。

当然,头部企业也不再只卖车,而是提供“车辆+补能+金融+管理”的一体化解决方案。包括三一、徐工等传统企业也在尝试将车辆与光伏、储能、充电/换电站建设打包,甚至联合高速交投与能源企业共同构建干线补能路网。

重卡不同于乘用车,作为生产资料工具,其未来的竞争核心,就是谁能通过技术降本和商业模式创新,最快帮客户算平这笔账。

在行业价格战不断、成本压力层层转嫁的背景下,深向科技目前的低毛利率并没有给出足够的安全感,甚至在卷度更胜以往的市场中,随时有被赶上的风险。

在这种状况下,深向科技想要在激烈的市场竞争中生存下来,必须尽快找到提升毛利率的有效途径,否则极有可能被市场淘汰。

面对供应链的掣肘和盈利的压力,深向科技必须要加速提升自身的整合能力。目前,深向科技正在全力推进湖州长兴“三电智慧工厂”的投产,将电池包、电驱桥、电控系统等占整车成本约60%的核心零部件从“外采”转为“自研自产”。

在「创业最前线」看来,只有掌握核心零部件的自主生产权,深向科技才能摆脱对外部供应商的依赖,通过技术迭代和规模效应大幅压低整车成本,从而在价格战中拥有更加可靠的盈利结构,掌握自身发展的命脉。

在软件方面,深向科技积极布局智能驾驶、智能网联等领域,通过软件开发为车辆赋予更多智能化功能。背靠百度大厂,深向科技应该更多发挥软件算法上的优势,向高毛利的智驾技术服务商转型。

从现阶段来看,现金流转正的深向科技,已经逐步向资本市场和全行业证明,其“先电动化、后智能化”的商业模式的可行性。

但在如今变幻莫测的市场中,随着销量规模的进一步扩大和自产零部件的降本,深向科技需要尽快实现扭亏为盈,建立长期的生存壁垒,证明其在这场生态“马拉松”中的持续发展能力。

注:文/魏帅,文章来源:创业最前线(公众号ID:chuangyezuiqianxian),本文为作者独立观点,不代表亿邦动力立场。

文章来源:创业最前线

广告
微信
朋友圈

这么好看,分享一下?

朋友圈 分享

APP内打开

+1
+1
微信好友 朋友圈 新浪微博 QQ空间
关闭
收藏成功
发送
/140 0