广告
加载中

赛豆新品牌定了:赛力斯工厂、字节大模型和元戎智驾

Maggie 2026-06-11 11:11
Maggie 2026/06/11 11:11

邦小白快读

EN
全文速览

本文核心是赛豆全新AI汽车品牌AIVA发布的关键信息,干货如下:

1. 品牌背景:AIVA的主体赛豆科技由原赛力斯旗下蓝电科技更名而来,5月底完成66.71亿元增资扩股,股权结构为重庆地方国资持股34.5%成为第一大股东,赛力斯持股32.96%退居第二,宁德时代等产业链企业也参与入股,公司为完全独立运营主体。

2. 产品与技术:首款量产车型AIVA ME7计划年内发布,定位20万元以上市场,在赛力斯凤凰工厂生产,将搭建独立销售渠道覆盖海内外市场;技术上采用和问界不同的路线,智能座舱用字节火山引擎豆包大模型,智能驾驶由元戎启行提供方案,提出“先有AI再有车”的开发逻辑,靠AI主动挖掘用户需求。

3. 当前争议:AIVA品牌名称被阿维塔指出抄袭,截至文章发布赛豆尚未回应,该品牌是赛力斯为了分散对华为合作的依赖开辟的第二增长曲线。

本文对新能源汽车品牌布局和战略调整有多方面干货参考,内容如下:

1. 战略层面:当企业过度依赖单一合作方,出现核心业务被分流、自有品牌增长疲软的问题时,可以通过资产重组拆分原有弱势品牌,引入多元化资本打造新品牌,既优化母体企业财报结构,又开辟第二增长曲线,赛力斯拆分蓝电推出AIVA就是典型案例。

2. 产品研发:可以尝试AI前置的产品定义思路,用AI主动批量挖掘用户需求,替代传统依赖人工调研的开发模式;技术路线选择多供应商组合模式,不绑定单一技术方,能有效降低合作风险。

3. 品牌运作:采用多元化股权结构,能整合制造、资本、技术、产业链多维度资源,新品牌独立运营搭建独立渠道,符合当前行业差异化竞争的趋势;同时要注意品牌设计的知识产权合规,避免引发品牌纠纷。

本文透露出新能源汽车市场的多个机会与风险,对汽车相关卖家的参考干货如下:

1. 市场机会:当前AI智能新能源汽车是增长风口,20万元以上的高端AI电动车还有充足的增量空间,新品牌AIVA切入该赛道,后续会搭建独立销售渠道面向海内外市场,有意向的经销商可以提前关注该品牌的后续招商合作信息。

2. 行业变化:原来车企绑定单一科技企业的模式风险逐步显现,华为汽车业务扩张稀释了原有合作方的资源稀缺性,越来越多新品牌选择多技术供应商合作+独立运营的路线,给渠道卖家提供了更多新品牌合作的选择。

3. 风险提示:新品牌运作面临多重挑战,包括品牌认可度建立、市场竞争、产品验证等不确定性;同时行业对原创知识产权的重视度提升,模仿品牌设计容易引发纠纷,卖家合作新品牌时要提前核查相关风险。

本文对整车生产工厂的转型和业务拓展有不少干货启示,内容如下:

1. 商业机会:新独立品牌在落地生产时,更倾向于选择拥有成熟整车制造能力、完善供应链和质量体系的工厂合作,AIVA首款量产车就落地赛力斯凤凰工厂,对国内拥有成熟资质的整车工厂来说,承接新品牌的生产订单,是拓展业务增量、盘活产能的重要方向。

2. 产品生产设计新需求:新品牌提出“AI先定义汽车”的开发逻辑,靠AI主动挖掘用户需求,对工厂的柔性生产能力、数字化研发适配能力提出了新要求,工厂需要调整原有开发流程,适配快速迭代的AI驱动产品开发模式。

3. 转型启示:传统车企旗下的闲置存量资产,可以通过资产重组引入多元化资本,盘活成为新的品牌项目,像原蓝电的存量资产就被重组为新品牌AIVA,这种模式给很多拥有存量产能的工厂提供了转型参考,依托制造能力对接新品牌需求,拓展生存空间。

本文透露出新能源汽车产业链服务商的行业趋势和机会,干货内容如下:

1. 客户核心痛点:当前很多车企都存在过度绑定单一技术方的风险,随着头部科技企业汽车业务扩张,原有合作的车企会面临资源分流、采购成本高、话语权弱的问题,这个痛点给各类技术服务商带来了新的市场机会。

2. 行业发展趋势:越来越多车企倾向于选择多技术供应商的组合方案,不再绑定单一全栈技术服务商,这给大模型服务商、智能驾驶解决方案服务商留出了更多切入主流整车项目的空间。

3. 新合作模式:现在技术服务商不再是单纯输出技术,而是深度参与产品定义和设计,和车企联合打造用户体验,比如字节火山引擎就和AIVA联合定义打造AI智能座舱体验,这种深度参与的模式,能提升服务商的合作收益和行业影响力,也给中小技术服务商提供了新的合作思路。

本文对汽车相关平台商的布局和运营有不少参考干货,内容如下:

1. 市场需求:新诞生的独立AI汽车品牌AIVA计划搭建独立销售渠道,面向海内外市场拓展,对线下销售平台、数字化汽车零售平台都产生了新的合作需求,平台商可以针对性储备相关资源对接新品牌的需求。

2. 行业新变化:新品牌采用多平台合作的模式,智舱和智驾分别和不同技术平台合作,打破了原来单一技术平台全栈包揽的格局,给不同垂类技术平台提供了切入整车项目的机会,平台商可以依托自身垂类优势对接需求。

3. 风险规避:新品牌运作中知识产权合规是核心风险之一,AIVA就因品牌名称设计陷入侵权争议,平台在引入新品牌、和新品牌开展合作时,需要提前核查知识产权相关内容,避免卷入法律纠纷,影响平台声誉。

4. 布局机会:20万元以上AI智能电动车是新的增长赛道,平台可以针对性调整招商和运营方向,抓住新品牌扩张的风口获得增长。

本文为新能源汽车产业研究提供了很多新的素材和研究方向,干货内容如下:

1. 产业新动向:当前中国新能源汽车产业进入分化调整阶段,原来深度绑定头部科技企业的模式暴露出诸多弊端,越来越多车企开始探索多元化发展路线,赛力斯拆分推出独立品牌AIVA就是产业转型的典型案例,反映了车企对风险分散的需求。

2. 新商业模式研究:本文出现了两种值得研究的新模式,一是股权层面“地方国资控股+传统车企参股+产业链资本入股”的混合结构,整合了各方资源又明确了产权边界;二是技术层面“智舱+智驾”分拆给不同供应商的双源路线,区别于原来的全栈绑定模式,为行业提供了差异化的参考路径。

3. 新产业问题:研究中可以关注两个新问题,一是车企深度绑定科技企业带来的业绩依赖、成本高企、资源分流的问题,二是新品牌竞争中的知识产权纠纷问题,这些都是产业发展到新阶段出现的新课题,对推动行业规范发展有研究价值。

返回默认

声明:快读内容全程由AI生成,请注意甄别信息。如您发现问题,请发送邮件至 run@ebrun.com 。

我是 品牌商 卖家 工厂 服务商 平台商 研究者 帮我再读一遍。

Quick Summary

This article outlines key details about the launch of AIVA, a new AI-powered automotive brand from Saidou Technology. The key takeaways are:

1. Background: Saidou Technology was rebranded from Landian Technology, a former subsidiary of Seres. In late May, it completed a capital increase of 6.671 billion yuan. Following the deal, Chongqing local state-owned assets hold a 34.5% stake as the largest shareholder, while Seres ranks second with a 32.96% stake. CATL and other industry players have also taken minority stakes, and the company operates as a fully independent entity.

2. Products and Technology: AIVA's first mass-produced model, the ME7, is scheduled to launch this year. It is positioned in the market above 200,000 yuan, will be manufactured at Seres' Fenghuang Plant, and will be sold through an independent sales network covering both domestic and overseas markets. AIVA adopts a different technology roadmap from the Huawei-backed AITO: it uses ByteDance's Volcengine Doubao large language model for its smart cockpit and deeproute's solution for intelligent driving. The brand follows an "AI-first" development logic, where AI proactively identifies user demand.

3. Current Controversy: AIVA has been accused of trademark infringement by Avatr, a competing Chinese EV brand. Saidou had not issued a response as of the article's publication. The new brand is widely viewed as Seres' effort to build a second growth engine and reduce its reliance on its Huawei partnership.

This article offers valuable insights for new energy vehicle (NEV) brands on strategic positioning and restructuring, as follows:

1. Strategic implications: When a business becomes over-reliant on a single partner and faces headwinds including core business diversion and weak in-house brand growth, it can restructure assets to spin off underperforming legacy units, bring in diversified capital to launch a new brand. This approach improves the parent company's financial structure while opening a second growth curve, as demonstrated by Seres' spin-off of Landian to launch AIVA.

2. Product R&D: Brands can test an AI-first product definition approach, where AI proactively identifies user demand at scale to replace traditional manual research-based development models. Adopting a multi-supplier technology strategy instead of tying to a single technology partner also effectively reduces cooperation risk.

3. Brand operations: A diversified ownership structure enables brands to integrate resources across manufacturing, capital, technology and the broader supply chain. Independent operation paired with dedicated sales channels aligns with the current industry trend of differentiated competition. At the same time, brands must prioritize intellectual property compliance in brand design to avoid costly disputes.

This article outlines key opportunities and risks in the NEV market for automotive-related sellers, as summarized below:

1. Market opportunity: AI-powered intelligent NEVs are currently a high-growth sector, and there remains significant room for incremental growth in the premium AI EV segment above 200,000 yuan. New brand AIVA is entering this space and will build an independent sales network targeting both domestic and international markets. Interested dealers can monitor upcoming updates on AIVA's dealer partnership and investment invitation plans.

2. Industry shifts: Risks of the traditional model of automakers tying to a single tech partner are becoming increasingly apparent. As Huawei expands its automotive business, the value of its partnership has been diluted for original collaborators. A growing number of new brands are adopting a multi-supplier, independent operation model, creating more partnership opportunities for channel sellers.

3. Risk warning: New brands face multiple inherent challenges, including uncertainty around building brand recognition, market competition and product validation. As the industry increasingly prioritizes original IP, copied brand design often leads to legal disputes. Sellers should conduct thorough due diligence on these risks before partnering with a new brand.

This article shares actionable insights for the transformation and business expansion of finished vehicle manufacturing plants, as follows:

1. Commercial opportunity: New independent brands typically partner with established factories that have mature vehicle manufacturing capabilities, complete supply chains and proven quality systems when launching production. For example, AIVA produces its first mass-market model at Seres' Fenghuang Plant. For Chinese factories with mature production qualifications, taking on manufacturing orders for new brands is a major path to grow business and utilize idle capacity.

2. New requirements for production and design: New brands like AIVA follow an "AI-first vehicle definition" logic that uses AI to proactively identify user demand. This raises new requirements for factories' flexible production capabilities and digital R&D adaption. Manufacturers need to adjust their traditional development workflows to adapt to the fast iteration pace of AI-driven product development.

4. Transformation takeaways: Idle legacy assets owned by traditional automakers can be revitalized through asset restructuring and bringing in diversified capital to launch new brand projects. The restructuring of former Landian assets into the new AIVA brand serves as a reference model for many factories with legacy capacity. By leveraging existing manufacturing capabilities to meet the demand of new brands, factories can expand their operating space.

This article outlines key industry trends and opportunities for NEV supply chain service providers, as summarized below:

1. Core customer pain points: Many automakers currently face the risk of over-reliance on a single technology provider. As leading tech companies expand their automotive businesses, incumbent partner automakers face reduced access to resources, higher procurement costs and weaker bargaining power — this pain point opens new market opportunities for a wide range of technology service providers.

2. Industry trends: A growing number of automakers are choosing combined solutions from multiple technology suppliers, rather than tying exclusively to a single full-stack technology service provider. This creates more space for large model providers and intelligent driving solution providers to secure partnerships on mainstream vehicle projects.

3. New cooperation models: Technology service providers no longer only output technology; they now participate deeply in product definition and design, and co-build user experience with automakers. For example, ByteDance's Volcengine co-defined and built AIVA's AI smart cockpit experience. This deeply involved engagement model increases service providers' revenue and industry influence, and offers a new cooperation blueprint for small and mid-sized technology service providers.

This article offers valuable takeaways for automotive-related marketplace platform operators on strategic positioning and operations, as follows:

1. New market demand: Newly launched independent AI car brand AIVA plans to build an independent sales channel and expand into global markets, creating new cooperation demand for both offline sales platforms and digital automotive retail platforms. Platforms can proactively reserve relevant resources to match the new brand's needs.

2. New industry shifts: This new brand partners with different technology platforms for its smart cockpit and intelligent driving systems, breaking the traditional full-stack monopoly model of a single technology platform. This creates entry opportunities for vertical technology platforms, which can leverage their domain expertise to connect with demand.

3. Risk mitigation: Intellectual property compliance is a core risk for new brand operations, as demonstrated by AIVA's ongoing trademark infringement dispute. Platforms should conduct prior IP due diligence before onboarding or partnering with new brands to avoid being drawn into legal disputes that damage platform reputation.

4. Growth opportunity: AI-powered intelligent electric vehicles priced above 200,000 yuan is an emerging high-growth segment. Platforms can adjust their investment invitation and operation strategies accordingly to capture growth from the expansion wave of new brands in this space.

This article provides new data and research directions for NEV industry research, with key insights as follows:

1. New industry trends: China's NEV industry is currently entering a phase of differentiation and adjustment. The traditional model of deep exclusive partnership with a leading tech firm has exposed multiple drawbacks, and a growing number of automakers are exploring diversified development paths. Seres' spin-off of independent brand AIVA is a typical case of this industry transition, reflecting automakers' growing demand for risk diversification.

2. New business model research: Two emerging models are worth further study. First, the mixed ownership structure of "local state-owned controlling stake + traditional automaker minority stake + industry capital participation", which integrates resources from all parties while clarifying property boundaries. Second, the dual-source technology strategy of splitting smart cockpit and intelligent driving supply to separate vendors, which differs from the traditional full-stack binding model and offers a differentiated alternative for the industry.

3. Emerging industry issues: Researchers can focus on two new industry questions: first, the problems of performance dependence, high costs and resource diversion caused by automakers' deep binding to tech firms; second, intellectual property disputes emerging amid intensifying new brand competition. These are new issues arising at the current stage of industry development, and research on them holds value for driving standardized industry growth.

Disclaimer: The "Quick Summary" content is entirely generated by AI. Please exercise discretion when interpreting the information. For issues or corrections, please email run@ebrun.com .

I am a Brand Seller Factory Service Provider Marketplace Seller Researcher Read it again.

6月9日晚,赛豆科技在北京举办品牌发布会,正式推出全新AI汽车品牌AIVA。品牌名称取自“Artificial Intelligence Voyage Ahead”的首字母缩写,寓意“AI陪伴用户一路向前”。发布会上,AIVA Origin Concept概念车同步亮相,首款量产车型定名AIVA ME7,计划年内发布。

赛豆科技由原赛力斯旗下蓝电科技更名而来,于5月底已完成约66.71亿元增资扩股并引入多家股东,这场发布会也是赛豆的首秀。AIVA的推出承载着赛力斯在问界之外开辟第二条增长曲线的战略意图,也意味着这家与华为深度合作的车企开始在多条技术路线上并行探索。

“去华为化”的AIVA

在技术方案上,AIVA做出了与问界截然不同的选择。

在AIVA品牌正式亮相之前,外界一度传闻赛力斯将与字节跳动联合造车,甚至被误传为“豆包汽车”。6月6日,字节跳动发布声明对此作出澄清:字节跳动没有造车或推出汽车品牌的计划;赛豆不是字节跳动或豆包推出的汽车品牌,双方不存在股权合作关系;火山引擎及豆包与汽车行业的合作,仅限于提供大模型、智能座舱等技术服务。

火山引擎副总裁杨立伟在发布会上再次明确表示,双方将联合定义、联合设计、共同打造AI汽车体验。火山引擎为AIVA全系车型提供豆包大模型、智能座舱等核心技术。

发布会上,AIVA总裁李博阐释了品牌的底层逻辑:“AI定义汽车,先有AI,再有车。”他指出,传统汽车开发更多依靠调研和人的判断做产品定义;而在AI时代,需求可以被主动、批量地挖掘。

此外,AIVA Origin Concept概念车同步亮相,首款量产车型AIVA ME7也将于年内发布。后续,品牌将进一步完善全谱系产品布局,覆盖20万元以上市场。

在智能驾驶方面,AIVA未沿用华为鸿蒙智行的技术路线,而是选择与元戎启行合作提供辅助驾驶解决方案。

在产业协同层面,AIVA的股东结构呈现出多元化特征。赛豆科技董事长张正源强调,赛豆科技并非赛力斯旗下第二品牌,而是一家完全独立的公司。赛力斯作为重要股东方,在整车制造、供应链、质量体系等方面提供支持;宁德时代在电池技术、能源解决方案上提供支撑;国资平台在资本与产业资源上给予支持。首款量产车将在赛力斯凤凰工厂生产,计划建立独立销售渠道并面向海内外市场。

值得关注的是,AIVA的品牌发布也伴随着外部争议。6月9日下午,阿维塔官方账号发文称:“某品牌名称在设计上与阿维塔极为相似,我们将其视为一种荣幸,但更视为一种警示:中国汽车不能走‘Ctrl+C Ctrl+V’之路。”并进一步表示“被模仿,是原创者的荣幸”,截至发稿,赛豆科技方面尚未就此作出正式公开回应。

AIVA接棒蓝电

理解了AIVA在技术路线和产业协同上的“新意”之后,再看它诞生的背景,便不难发现:AIVA的出现,很大一部分原因是源于一场并不成功的品牌试验。

2025年,赛力斯交出了一份亮眼的财务答卷。全年实现营业收入1650.5亿元,同比增长13.7%;净利润59.6亿元,连续两年盈利。新能源汽车销量47.23万辆,其中问界系列累计交付42.6万辆,占赛力斯新能源总销量的比例超过90%。高端车型持续放量,新能源汽车毛利率达28.8%。

然而光鲜数字背后也有隐忧,自营品牌蓝电长期疲弱:蓝电于2023年3月发布,定位10万至15万元区间,首款车型蓝电E5搭载弗迪动力混动系统和HUAWEI HiCar 3.0。由于品牌知名度不足,蓝电始终未能打开局面,据相关数据,蓝电E5车型2023年全年销量为8756辆;2024年得益于E5 PLUS新车型的上市,销量攀升至2.9万辆;2025年,蓝电销量降至2万辆。

蓝电的低迷从侧面进一步验证了赛力斯对华为合作的依赖。问界对赛力斯的销售贡献超过82%,是公司主要盈利增长来源,但这种深度捆绑也带来了高昂的代价。

据赛力斯招股书,2022年至2025年上半年,赛力斯累计向华为支付采购费用超过750亿元,仅2025年上半年就高达200亿元,占同期总采购额的三成有余;相当于每卖出一辆问界,就有约13.6万至14.1万元流向华为体系。

与此同时,华为的汽车业务版图也在快速扩张。继问界之后,华为先后与奇瑞推出智界、与北汽推出享界、与江淮推出尊界、与上汽推出尚界,形成“五界”并立的格局。赛力斯“华为独家合作方”的稀缺性被消解。虽然问界在鸿蒙智行中仍占据销量主导地位——2026年5月鸿蒙智行全系交付46122台,问界汽车全系交付34320台,占比超七成——但华为资源的分流已是事实。

在此背景下,蓝电的资产重组被提上日程。2026年2月,赛力斯与重庆市沙坪坝区政府签署合作协议,以蓝电相关存量资产剥离出资设立新公司。5月25日,蓝电科技完成约66.71亿元增资扩股,重庆地方国资沙磁致远出资34.33亿元,以34.5%的持股比例成为第一大股东;赛力斯持股降至32.96%,退居第二大股东;宁德时代旗下问鼎投资、博俊科技、星宇股份等产业链企业同步入股。随后5月29日,蓝电科技正式更名为重庆赛豆科技有限公司。在此第二周,AIVA品牌正式亮相。

这一剥离使得蓝电资产不再纳入赛力斯合并报表,公司财务报表更聚焦于问界核心业务。同时,地方国资成为第一大股东,让赛豆与赛力斯之间形成了“参股而非控股”的清晰边界。

总的来说,AIVA的发布可以看作赛力斯在新能源竞争格局日趋复杂背景下的一次主动调整。对赛力斯而言,AIVA提供了一个在华为技术体系之外验证自身供应链整合能力的试验场。对行业而言,这种“地方国资控股+赛力斯参股+字节系技术赋能”的组合模式,以及“智舱豆包+智驾元戎启行”的双源供应思路,为其他车企提供了一种可参照的差异化方案。

AIVA首款量产车ME7年内亮相后,其在20万元以上新能源市场的竞争力、渠道铺设效率以及产品定义能否打动目标用户,都有待市场检验。

注:文/Maggie,文章来源:盖世汽车(公众号ID:gasgooweb),本文为作者独立观点,不代表亿邦动力立场。

文章来源:盖世汽车

广告
微信
朋友圈

这么好看,分享一下?

朋友圈 分享

APP内打开

+1
+1
微信好友 朋友圈 新浪微博 QQ空间
关闭
收藏成功
发送
/140 0