广告
加载中

218亿砸下去 这个赛道目前走到C轮的公司只有5家

Judy 2026-06-10 10:20
Judy 2026/06/10 10:20

邦小白快读

EN
全文速览

本文梳理了2015年以来国内合成生物学赛道的融资全景,核心干货信息如下

1. 核心基础数据:国内该赛道累计融资218亿元,共110家公司获得301笔融资,仅5家走到C轮及以上,近八成融资事件发生在A轮及以前,行业整体仍处于早期阶段。全球合成生物学市场年复合增长率超21%,2025年中国市场规模约1420亿元,长期增长空间充足。

2. 行业发展趋势:2021年资本涌入,2022年热度见顶,2023-2024年进入收缩期,2025年出现明显回暖,资金投向从集中堆平台型公司转向均匀分布,食品/替代蛋白方向异军突起,国资开始系统性入场,AI与合成生物学的融合正在缩短研发周期。

3. 当前行业核心特征:行业已经从前期的概念热进入验证期,要求企业拿出量产落地成果,仅靠讲故事无法获得后续融资,行业整体风险与机遇并存。

合成生物学赛道的发展为品牌商带来了新的产品与增长机会,相关干货总结如下

1. 消费与政策趋势:当前政策放开合成生物相关原料应用,叠加消费升级,消费者对绿色、功能性原料需求提升,食品/替代蛋白方向在2025年实现爆发式增长,融资事件数翻倍,HMO等功能性原料已经获得产业资本认可,适合品牌布局新品类。

2. 产品研发机会:合成生物学可以生产更绿色、更精准的原料,理论上可以替代所有石油化工来源的原料,符合当下品牌的绿色转型趋势,可应用在食品、化妆品、材料等多个品牌核心赛道。

3. 需要注意的风险:目前消费者对“合成生物造”产品的接受度仍待培育,市场教育成本较高,品牌布局新原料需要先做好消费者认知铺垫,优先选择已经通过合规审批的原料品类降低风险。

当前国内合成生物学赛道处于早期阶段,给产业链相关卖家带来了新的机会与风险,核心干货如下

1. 值得把握的增长机会:食品/替代蛋白、功能性原料是2025年增速最快的细分方向,政策放开叠加消费升级双驱动,HMO、麦角硫因等细分品类密集获得融资,长三角已经形成产业落地铁三角,合肥复制新能源模式推出国资领投+产业导入的扶持政策,有大量政策红利。

2. 需要注意的风险提示:行业绝大多数项目停留在B轮及以前,从实验室克级生产到吨级量产的放大失败率较高,商业化周期长达5-10年,和VC的存续期错配,后续融资不确定性高,平台型公司多存在多场景拓展但没有做透的问题。

3. 机会方向:可以优先对接已经拿到国资支持、有明确量产规划的项目,AI+合成生物学融合方向目前缺口较大,相关配套产品和服务有较大增长空间。

合成生物学的发展给传统工厂带来了新的商业机会与转型方向,核心干货如下

1. 产品生产与设计需求:当前市场对合成生物来源的绿色产品需求旺盛,包括替代石油基的可降解生物基材料、合成来源的食品功能性原料、医药原料药等,符合政策绿色转型方向,有庞大市场空间。

2. 可对接的商业机会:目前国内绝大多数合成生物学创业公司处于中试或量产爬坡阶段,缺成熟的制造产能配套,拥有发酵、产物分离提纯、大规模生产能力的传统工厂,可以和创业公司展开产能合作,获取新的业务增量。

3. 转型启示:合成生物学是国家认定的战略性新兴产业,多地出台专项扶持政策,传统工厂可以抓住政策机遇,对接当地国资和产业园区,提前布局绿色产能,对接合成生物学项目实现升级,应对限塑等政策要求,打开新增长曲线。

国内合成生物学行业处于早期验证阶段,给相关服务商带来了明确的市场机会,核心干货如下

1. 行业发展趋势:国内赛道累计融资218亿元,2025年已经出现明显回暖,全球市场年复合增长率超过21%,长期增长空间充足,国资已经开始系统性入场,为行业提供了长期稳定的资本支持,多个细分赛道都在快速发展。

2. 客户核心痛点:合成生物学创业公司普遍面临从实验室到量产的“死亡谷”,菌株稳定性、工艺放大、分离纯化等环节瓶颈多,放大失败率高;多数早期创业公司缺乏合规审批经验,不同细分方向的监管路径差异大,同时缺乏产业资源对接渠道。

3. 可切入的解决方案方向:可以针对性开发中试工艺放大服务、合规咨询服务、AI辅助菌株设计服务,也可以对接产业资本和园区资源,为创业公司提供全链条落地支持,AI+合成生物学融合方向缺口大,发展空间充足。

合成生物学行业的快速发展给产业平台带来了新的机遇,核心干货总结如下

1. 当前行业对平台的核心需求:合成生物学创业公司覆盖多个细分方向,需要从研发、中试到量产的全链条配套支持,不同方向需要对接不同的下游产业资源,比如食品方向对接消费品牌,医药方向对接药企,材料方向对接化工企业,需要平台搭建资源对接网络。

2. 成熟可参考的运营模式:杭州依托当地合成生物学产业园形成了很好的集聚效应,依靠长三角的生物医药、化工、制造产业基础,吸引了大量创业项目;合肥采用“国资领投+产业导入”的模式,复制新能源领域的成功经验,已经吸引了多个优质项目落地。

3. 招商与风险规避要点:招商可以重点倾斜2025年爆发的食品/替代蛋白方向项目,对接国资资本获得政策支持;同时要注意行业整体偏早期,要规避仅讲概念没有落地能力的项目,优先布局有明确技术管线、推进量产落地的项目,给早期项目足够的孵化周期。

本文基于IT桔子的301笔融资数据,给出了国内合成生物学产业的全景梳理,对产业研究有较高价值,核心内容如下

1. 产业最新动向:国内合成生物学融资经历了2021-2022年的狂热,2023-2024年的收缩,2025年进入回暖期,资金投向从早期集中追捧平台型公司转向细分应用赛道,食品/替代蛋白异军突起,国资开始系统性入场,产业资本CVC参与度较低,AI与合成生物学融合成为新的发展方向,地域上长三角领先,合肥成为新的产业热点。

2. 行业新出现的问题:行业普遍存在从实验室到量产的“死亡谷”,商业化周期长达5-10年,和VC基金的存续期错配,退出压力大,目前仅5家企业走到C轮及以上,近八成项目停留在A轮及以前,平台型公司多场景拓展的商业化路径不被资本看好。

3. 政策研究启示:当前各地已经出台专项支持政策,后续需要进一步完善中试平台等公共配套建设,鼓励产业资本入场,完善合成生物产品的分类监管,帮助行业降低落地风险,推动行业从概念走向商业化。

返回默认

声明:快读内容全程由AI生成,请注意甄别信息。如您发现问题,请发送邮件至 run@ebrun.com 。

我是 品牌商 卖家 工厂 服务商 平台商 研究者 帮我再读一遍。

Quick Summary

This article provides a full overview of financing in China's synthetic biology track dating back to 2015, with key takeaways below:

1. Core baseline data: To date, the track has accumulated 21.8 billion yuan in total financing, with 110 domestic companies securing 301 financing rounds. Only 5 of these companies have reached the Series C stage or beyond, and nearly 80% of all financing events occurred at Series A or earlier, indicating the industry as a whole remains in an early stage. The global synthetic biology market boasts a compound annual growth rate (CAGR) exceeding 21%, and China's market size is projected to reach approximately 142 billion yuan by 2025, leaving abundant room for long-term growth.

2. Industry development trends: Capital inflows surged in 2021, peaked in 2022, and entered a contraction phase from 2023 to 2024, with a clear recovery emerging in 2025. Capital allocation has shifted from concentrated bets on platform companies to a more diversified distribution across segments. The food and alternative protein segment has emerged as a standout growth area, state-owned capital has begun systematic entry into the space, and the integration of AI and synthetic biology is shortening R&D cycles.

3. Core current industry characteristics: The sector has shifted from an earlier period of concept hype to a validation phase, where companies are now required to deliver mass production and commercialization results. Storytelling alone is no longer sufficient to secure follow-on financing, and the industry as a whole faces a mix of risks and opportunities.

The development of the synthetic biology track has brought new product and growth opportunities for brands, with key takeaways summarized below:

1. Consumer and policy trends: China has relaxed regulatory approvals for synthetic biology-derived ingredients, while ongoing consumption upgrading has driven rising consumer demand for green, functional ingredients. The food and alternative protein segment saw explosive growth in 2025, with the number of financing events doubling. Functional ingredients such as HMOs have already gained recognition from industrial capital, making them suitable for brands looking to expand into new categories.

2. Product R&D opportunities: Synthetic biology enables production of greener, more precise ingredients, and can theoretically replace all petrochemical-derived feedstocks, aligning with the green transition trend currently prioritized by brands. It can be applied across multiple core brand sectors including food, cosmetics and materials.

3. Key risks to note: Consumer acceptance of "synbio-made" products still needs to be cultivated, resulting in high market education costs. Brands looking to roll out new ingredients should first build consumer awareness, and prioritize ingredients that have already passed regulatory approval to reduce risk.

China's synthetic biology track is currently in an early stage of development, bringing new opportunities and risks for upstream and downstream sellers along the industrial chain, with key insights below:

1. Growth opportunities to capture: Food/alternative protein and functional ingredients are the fastest-growing segments in 2025, driven by both policy liberalization and consumption upgrading. Niche categories such as HMOs and ergothioneine have seen a flurry of financing activity. The Yangtze River Delta has formed an industrial cluster for commercialized synbio projects, and Hefei has replicated its successful new energy industry model by launching a support policy combining state-owned capital lead investment and industrial introduction, unlocking abundant policy dividends.

2. Key risk warnings: The vast majority of projects are still at Series B or earlier stages. The failure rate for scale-up from lab-gram production to ton-level mass production is high, and commercialization cycles stretch 5 to 10 years, which mismatches the fund life cycle of venture capital, leading to high uncertainty for follow-on financing. Most platform companies have pursued expansion into multiple scenarios without deeply penetrating any single market.

3. Recommended opportunity areas: Sellers can prioritize partnering with projects that have already secured state-backed capital support and clear mass production roadmaps. The integration of AI and synthetic biology currently has large unmet demand, leaving substantial room for growth for related supporting products and services.

The growth of synthetic biology has opened up new business opportunities and transformation directions for traditional manufacturers, with key insights below:

1. Product manufacturing and design demand: Market demand for green synthetic biology-derived products is currently strong, including biodegradable bio-based materials that replace petroleum-based products, synthetic functional food ingredients, and pharmaceutical APIs. These align with the policy direction of green transition and have enormous market potential.

2. Accessible business opportunities: Most domestic synthetic biology startups are currently in the pilot or mass production ramp-up stage, and lack access to mature manufacturing capacity. Traditional factories with existing capabilities in fermentation, product separation and purification, and large-scale production can enter into capacity cooperation partnerships with startups to capture new business growth.

3. Transformation takeaways: Synthetic biology is a nationally recognized strategic emerging industry, and multiple local governments have introduced dedicated support policies. Traditional factories can seize this policy opportunity, partner with local state-owned capital and industrial parks, proactively lay out green capacity, and upgrade through partnerships with synbio projects. This allows them to meet regulatory requirements such as plastic restrictions and open up new growth curves.

China's synthetic biology industry is in an early-stage validation phase, bringing clear market opportunities for relevant service providers, with key insights below:

1. Industry development trends: The domestic track has accumulated 21.8 billion yuan in total financing, and saw a clear recovery in 2025. The global market has a CAGR exceeding 21%, with abundant long-term growth room. State-owned capital has already begun systematic entry into the sector, providing long-term stable capital support, and multiple niche segments are growing rapidly.

2. Core customer pain points: Synthetic biology startups commonly face a "valley of death" between lab R&D and mass production, with multiple bottlenecks in strain stability, process scale-up, and separation and purification leading to high scale-up failure rates. Most early-stage startups lack experience in regulatory approval, as regulatory pathways vary widely across different segments, and they also lack access to industrial resource connection channels.

3. Targeted solution entry points: Service providers can develop tailored offerings including pilot process scale-up services, regulatory consulting, and AI-assisted strain design. They can also connect startups with industrial capital and industrial park resources to provide end-to-end commercialization support. The AI-synthetic biology integration segment has large unmet demand and substantial growth potential.

The rapid growth of the synthetic biology industry has brought new opportunities for industrial platforms, with key takeaways summarized below:

1. Core industry demand for platforms: Synthetic biology startups operate across a wide range of segments, requiring end-to-end supporting services from R&D and pilot testing to mass production. Different segments require connections with different downstream industrial resources: for example, food-focused startups need connections with consumer brands, pharma-focused startups need pharmaceutical partners, and material startups need connections with chemical companies. This requires platforms to build comprehensive resource connection networks.

2. Proven operational models to reference: Hangzhou has developed strong agglomeration effects through its local synthetic biology industrial park, leveraging the Yangtze River Delta's existing industrial base in biopharmaceuticals, chemicals and manufacturing to attract a large number of startup projects. Hefei has adopted a "state capital lead investment + industrial introduction" model, replicating its successful experience in the new energy sector, and has already attracted multiple high-quality projects to land.

3. Key points for investment promotion and risk mitigation: Platforms can prioritize recruiting projects in the food/alternative protein segment, which boomed in 2025, and partner with state-owned capital to access policy support. At the same time, it is important to note that the industry as a whole remains early-stage, so platforms should avoid concept-only projects without commercialization capabilities, and prioritize projects with clear technology pipelines and active progress toward mass production, while providing adequate incubation periods for early-stage projects.

Based on 301 financing records from IT桔子, this article provides a full overview of China's synthetic biology industry with high value for industrial research, with core content below:

1. Latest industry trends: Domestic synthetic biology financing experienced a boom from 2021 to 2022, a contraction from 2023 to 2024, and entered a recovery phase in 2025. Capital allocation has shifted from the early concentrated hype for platform companies to niche application segments, with food/alternative protein emerging as a standout growth area. State-owned capital has begun systematic entry into the sector, while participation from industrial capital and corporate CVCs remains low. The integration of AI and synthetic biology has emerged as a new growth direction. Geographically, the Yangtze River Delta leads the industry, and Hefei has emerged as a new industrial hot spot.

2. New emerging industry problems: The industry as a whole faces a widespread "valley of death" between lab R&D and mass production, with 5 to 10-year commercialization cycles that mismatch the fund life of VC funds, creating heavy exit pressure. Currently only 5 companies have reached Series C or beyond, and nearly 80% of all projects remain at Series A or earlier. Capital is no longer bullish on the multi-scene expansion commercialization path adopted by most platform companies.

3. Implications for policy research: Multiple local governments have already introduced dedicated support policies. Going forward, further improvements are needed in public infrastructure such as pilot test platforms, incentives to encourage industrial capital entry, and clearer categorized regulation for synthetic biology products. These steps will reduce commercialization risk for the industry and help the sector move from concept to full-scale commercialization.

Disclaimer: The "Quick Summary" content is entirely generated by AI. Please exercise discretion when interpreting the information. For issues or corrections, please email run@ebrun.com .

I am a Brand Seller Factory Service Provider Marketplace Seller Researcher Read it again.

作者 |Judy

来源 |IT桔子

如果用一句话解释合成生物学,那就是——把生命当成一台可编程的机器。

传统生物学是“观察自然发生了什么”,合成生物学则反过来:先想清楚“我要什么”,再设计、组装、调试一个生物系统来实现它。具体来说,就是通过基因编辑、代谢通路重构、底盘细胞改造等手段,让微生物像微型工厂一样,按照人的意志生产特定分子——可以是药物、材料、食品原料,也可以是化妆品成分或工业酶。

这个领域的想象空间在于:理论上,任何由石油化工路线生产的分子,都可能找到一条生物合成路径来替代,而且更绿色、更精准。全球市场已经给出了信号——据Fortune Business Insights数据,2025年全球合成生物学市场规模约171亿美元,预计到2034年将增长至950亿美元,年复合增长率超过21%。而据GEP Research测算,采用更宽口径(含终端产品),2025年全球市场规模已突破680亿美元,中国约为1420亿元人民币。

那么,中国这个赛道的创业和融资到底走到了哪一步?我们基于IT桔子数据库,梳理了2015年以来国内合成生物学领域共301笔融资事件、涉及110家公司,试图给出一份全景式的回答。

数据口径:IT桔子数据库,行业前沿科技-子行业合成生物学。

一、总体画像:218亿、110家公司、11年

几个特征值得注意:

第一,多轮融资比例高,但走到C轮以上的极少。110家公司中有77家完成了至少两轮融资,蓝晶微生物甚至拿到了8轮融资。但能走到C轮及以上的只有5家公司——君合盟(C轮)、弈柯莱生物(D轮)、酶赛生物(C+轮)等。这意味着绝大多数公司还停留在B轮及以前的“从0到1”阶段,商业化的验证窗口尚未关闭,但压力正在加大。

第二,金额分布呈典型的“长尾”形态。70笔过亿的大额事件贡献了绝大部分融资金额,而3000万以下的事件有68笔。头部项目吸金效应明显,但中小项目的融资本身并不算低——中位数3000万元,意味着即使是普通项目,融到的钱也足以支撑一段时间的研发。

第三,97%的融资以人民币计价,美元融资仅8笔。 合成生物学是一个高度“国产化”的赛道,参与方以本土资本为主,海外美元基金参与度相对有限。

二、年度趋势:2022年见顶,2025年回暖,2026年大单拉动

这条曲线很典型——2021年起资本涌入,2022年达到峰值;2023年事件数继续增加但金额腰斩,说明资本开始分化,小项目仍在推进但大额融资骤减;2024年延续了这一收缩态势。

2025年出现明显回暖:事件数翻倍至72笔,金额回到37.8亿。但结构变了——2022年的“热钱”主要涌向平台型和材料类公司(态创生物A+轮独揽约21亿),而2025年的资金分布更均匀,食品/替代蛋白方向异军突起,与平台/工具类并列17笔事件。

2026年上半年数据需要审慎看待:29笔事件、34.4亿元看似强势,但其中微元合成B轮15亿元就占了近44%。剔除这笔后,剩余28笔合计约19.4亿元,与2025年同期(14.2亿)相比有增长但幅度有限。

三、七大方向:谁在吸金,谁在长跑

基于每家公司的实际业务定位(而非宽泛的行业标签),我们将110家获融资公司重新划分为7个应用方向:

平台/工具:金额最大,变数也最大

36家平台/工具类公司拿走了全行业45%的融资金额,是当之无愧的“吸金王”。但这个类别也是最复杂的——微元合成、态创生物、柯泰亚生物等公司,业务横跨医药、食品、材料多个方向,本质上是在做“生物版代工厂”或“细胞工厂设计平台”。

这类公司的故事讲得好听:一套底层技术,多个应用场景,理论上可以无限复制。但现实挑战在于,不同应用方向的工艺要求、监管路径、客户特征差异很大,“什么都做”往往意味着“什么都没做透”。态创生物2022年A+轮融资额估值超百亿,但此后融资节奏明显放缓,侧面印证了市场对平台型公司商业化路径的疑虑。

生物基材料:单笔最贵,押注可降解

生物基材料方向的单笔均值(9822万元)仅次于平台/工具类,且高度集中在PHA(聚羟基脂肪酸酯)和呋喃类材料两个细分。蓝晶微生物8轮融资累计近20亿、微构工场6.6亿、利夫生物7.5亿——头部三家公司就吃掉了该方向72%的金额。

这个方向的故事核心是“替代石油基塑料”,逻辑清晰但商业化周期长。PHA的生产成本至今仍显著高于传统塑料,大规模应用依赖政策推动(如限塑令加码)和成本曲线下探。蓝晶微生物在2023年2月完成B+轮4亿元融资后,至今未再披露新融资,也在一定程度上反映了市场的观望心态。

食品/替代蛋白:2025年增速最快的方向

食品/替代蛋白在2025年实现了爆发式增长——事件数从2024年的6笔跃升至17笔,与平台/工具并列第一。HMO(母乳低聚糖)、麦角硫因、微生物蛋白、甜味蛋白等细分方向密集获得融资。

HMO是一个典型例子:虹摹生物作为国内首个通过农业农村部安全性评估和卫健委审批的HMOs原料企业,2024—2026年连续完成4轮融资,投资方包括蒙牛创投、合肥建投、合肥产投等产业和国资资本。一兮生物也凭借HMO生物合成在2025年8月拿到2亿元A轮。

这一方向的增长逻辑是“政策放开+消费升级”的双轮驱动,但风险同样明确——功能性食品和原料的市场教育成本高,消费者对“合成生物造”的接受度仍需验证。

医药/制药:低调但确定性最高

医药方向的51笔事件分布在19家公司,单笔均值3935万元看似不高,但这是因为它没有平台类那种动辄数亿的超大额融资。如果看商业逻辑,医药方向的确定性可能是所有方向中最强的——药物研发路径清晰、监管体系成熟、付费方明确。

修实生物做多肽药物生物合成、优信合生做活体生物药、衡昱生物做基因药物——每一家都有明确的产品管线和适应症。需要指出的是,合成生物学在医药领域的应用更多是“工具层面”的(如用生物法替代化学法合成原料药、用工程菌生产重组蛋白),真正意义上的“合成生物学原创新药”仍处于早期。

四、地域格局:长三角领先,合肥异军突起

长三角(上海+浙江+江苏)合计156笔,占52%。这与当地的产业基础高度相关——上海的生物医药生态、浙江的化工和食品加工链、江苏的制造能力,构成了合成生物学落地的“铁三角”。

城市维度上,杭州以46笔事件领跑,深圳33笔、浦东32笔紧随其后。杭州的合成生物学创业密度高,与当地合成生物学产业园(如杭州湾合成生物创新谷)的集聚效应有关。

合肥值得关注。12笔事件、8.2亿元,绝对量不大,但投资方身份特殊——合肥建投、合肥高投、合肥产投、皖投集团密集出现在虹摹生物、神笔生物等项目的投资方名单中。合肥正在复制其在新能源领域的“国资领投+产业导入”模式,合成生物学可能是下一个重点押注方向。

五、谁在投:峰瑞领跑,国资入场

活跃度最高的投资机构Top5:

峰瑞资本以15次参与遥遥领先,且在蓝晶微生物、柯泰亚生物等多个头部项目中连续加注。红杉中国在微构工场、柯泰亚生物等项目中也有深入布局。

一个重要趋势是国资的系统性入场。 河南投资集团(5次)、顺禧基金(5次)、亦庄国投(3次)、临港蓝湾资本(3次)、西湖科创投(3次)等国资背景机构已成为合成生物学领域不可忽视的力量。这与各地政府将合成生物学纳入战略性新兴产业的政策导向一致——2025年12月中国更新了生物安全法实施细则,首次将合成生物产品纳入分类管理目录;北京、上海、深圳、杭州等地也相继出台了合成生物学专项支持政策。

CVC的参与相对有限:碧桂园创投4次(集中在蓝晶微生物)、腾讯投资1次、美团1次、蒙牛创投1次。产业资本尚未大规模进入,可能因为合成生物学公司的产品大多处于中试或量产爬坡期,与CVC母公司的供应链协同还需要时间验证。

六、风险与展望:从“讲故事”到“交作业”

合成生物学正处在一个关键的验证期。几个核心风险不容忽视:

1. 从实验室到工厂的“死亡谷”。 合成生物学在实验室阶段往往表现优异,但规模化发酵工艺的放大不是简单的线性外推——菌株稳定性、产物收率、分离纯化成本等环节,每一步都可能成为瓶颈。多位行业人士表示,从克级到吨级的放大失败率并不低。

2. 商业化节奏的不确定性。 医药方向面临漫长的临床审批周期,材料方向面临与传统石化产品的成本竞争,食品方向面临消费者认知门槛。没有一个方向可以轻松跑通。

3. 资本周期的错配。 合成生物学的典型产品开发周期是5—10年,但VC基金的存续期通常7—8年。2021—2022年入场的资金,现在正面临退出压力。如果被投企业未能及时证明商业化能力,下一轮融资可能变得更加困难。

4. 行业整体偏早期。110家公司中,近80%的事件发生在A轮及以前,能走到C轮的仅有5家。这个数据本身就说明,行业还远未到“收获期”。

但积极信号同样存在:食品/替代蛋白方向在2025年的快速升温,说明政策放开正在转化为真实的市场需求;国资的持续加码,为行业的长期投入提供了“耐心资本”;AI与合成生物学的融合(如金珵科技、智衍造物、域新说生物等)正在缩短从设计到验证的周期。

合成生物学的赛道够大,故事够长。但从2022年的狂热到2024年的冷静,市场已经学会了一件事——概念不等于产能,融资不等于商业化。接下来,能拿到钱的,一定是那些把“从0到1”的实验室成果,真正推到“从1到100”的量产线上的公司。

注:文/Judy,文章来源:IT桔子(公众号ID:itjuzi521),本文为作者独立观点,不代表亿邦动力立场。

文章来源:IT桔子

广告
微信
朋友圈

这么好看,分享一下?

朋友圈 分享

APP内打开

+1
+1
微信好友 朋友圈 新浪微博 QQ空间
关闭
收藏成功
发送
/140 0