广告
加载中

倒卖Token 隐秘的中转站生意有多暴利

张宁洢 2026-06-09 14:47
张宁洢 2026/06/09 14:47

邦小白快读

EN
全文速览

本文介绍了大模型时代Token中转站生意的全貌,既给想要入场赚钱的普通人点明现状风险,也给想要使用中转服务的普通人整理了避坑干货。

1. Token中转站是AI算力转接服务商,可低价一站式调用GPT、Claude等国内外主流大模型,解决了普通用户官方定价高、多平台充值麻烦、个人无法直接拿官方批发价的痛点,少量使用Token的成本仅需几块钱,远低于官方订阅费。

2. 当前赛道已经不适合无资源的普通人入场赚差价:赛道拥挤价格内卷,正规渠道利润仅30%左右,多数小玩家建站一周就因缺客户、利润低闭站,只有有私域流量、技术资源的玩家才有获利空间。

3. 普通用户使用中转站要注意辨别,可通过对比模型回答风格、上下文长度、扣费明细等判断是否掺水,要警惕违规中转、信息泄露、卷钱跑路等风险。

当前大模型应用快速普及,Token成为AI应用的基础流通资料,Token中转站赛道的发展,给布局AI相关业务的品牌商提供了诸多参考。

1. 消费需求与用户行为层面:个人用户、中小创业者、中小开发者对大模型Token有强刚需,但难以承担官方高价订阅成本,也嫌多平台注册充值麻烦,对低价一站式的中转服务接受度很高,用户优先选择稳定性强、口碑好的服务商。

2. 成熟品牌的营销玩法可参考:孙宇晨、傅盛等行业名人已经入场,通过高额补贴、积分拉新,打出一个API调用全系列大模型的卖点,短时间就获得了超百万注册用户,引流效果突出。

3. 品牌入局需要规避风险:帮用户违规接入境外大模型属于违法行为,会触碰法规红线,掺水造假、泄露用户信息也会严重影响品牌口碑,必须走合规路线规范运营。

Token中转站是大模型时代兴起的新生意,想要入场的卖家需要明确当前赛道现状、盈利模式和潜在风险,理性判断入场机会。

1. 当前赛道现状:早期入局的玩家曾有月入百万的成绩,但如今赛道已经十分拥挤,价格内卷严重,正规渠道进货的利润空间仅剩下30%左右,仅适合有技术、资源、固定私域流量的大玩家入场,无基础小玩家很难赚到钱,很多建站一周就被迫闭站。

2. 主流盈利模式有三种:一是赚Token进销差价,利润率最高可达50%以上,不合规渠道利润率更高;二是资金沉淀获利,多数用户充值后用不完Token额度,沉淀资金可被运营商使用;三是收学员、做AI陪跑服务,是当前利润最高的模式,企业陪跑一单就能赚几千甚至上万元。

3. 核心风险提示:违规帮用户接入境外大模型属于违法行为,会面临刑事处罚;钻官方空子薅免费额度、共享账号容易被封号,掺水欺诈也会带来法律风险。

大模型时代Token是企业数字化转型的基础生产资料,Token中转站赛道的兴起,给工厂落地AI应用、发掘新商业机会带来不少启示。

1. 工厂AI应用的成本可降低:工厂推进数字化转型,会用到大模型做产品设计、营销内容生产、生产管理优化等多个场景,需要调用不同的大模型,通过Token中转站可以一站式低价调用多模型,不需要分别订阅多个官方服务,能大幅降低中小工厂AI应用的门槛和成本。

2. 存在闲置资源变现的商业机会:不少规模工厂本身和大模型平台合作,能拿到价格极低甚至不限量的Token配额,大部分配额处于闲置状态,可以通过合规的中转模式对外分享,盘活闲置资源获得额外收益。

3. 数字化转型的启示:工厂做AI相关新业务不需要过高技术壁垒和重资产投入,可借鉴中转站轻资产整合资源的模式,瞄准用户刚需切入,降低转型试错成本,同时要注意合规运营,保护用户信息安全,避免触碰法规红线。

Token中转站是大模型产业细分出来的新兴赛道,当前市场痛点突出,给AI相关服务商带来了明确的发展机会。

1. 行业发展趋势:随着大模型应用落地普及,市场对Token的需求持续增长,中小客户和个人用户对低价一站式大模型服务的刚需很强,赛道已经从早期的蓝海变成当前大玩家主导的市场,未来合规化、规范化发展是必然趋势。

2. 当前市场的核心客户痛点:一是官方Token零售价格高,个人和中小客户拿不到批发低价;二是多模型订阅流程繁琐,使用门槛高;三是市场鱼龙混杂,用户无法辨别Token真假纯度,还面临信息泄露、服务商跑路的风险。

3. 可落地的解决方案方向:可以推出Token纯度检测服务,帮用户辨别靠谱服务商,文中已有玩家推出这类服务,检测数据显示60%的Claude中转都存在掺水问题,市场需求明确;也可以做合规的中转服务,整合正规官方接口,给下游提供稳定低价的服务,建立口碑就能获取稳定用户。

Token中转站赛道的兴起,反映了大模型生态下游用户的真实需求,给布局大模型服务的平台商带来诸多启发,也明确了需要规避的风险。

1. 用户对平台的核心需求:用户希望实现一个API调用多个主流大模型,拿到比官方零售更低的价格,简化充值和使用流程,降低中小用户的使用门槛,这要求大模型服务平台优化客户分层体系,推出灵活的小额套餐,满足中小用户的差异化需求。

2. 可借鉴的运营和招商方法:头部入场玩家用高额补贴、积分优惠拉新,打出统一API调用全模型的卖点,短时间就能获取大量注册用户,引流思路值得借鉴;平台还可以发展分销代理模式,给代理商20%-40%的佣金,能快速拓展市场触达更多用户。

3. 需要规避的核心风险:做中转服务必须合规,不能违规打通跨境信道接入境外模型,否则会触碰法规红线;要规避批量薅免费额度、共享账号这类容易被官方封号的进货渠道,同时做好用户信息保护和资金管理,避免信息泄露和卷款跑路风险,维护平台信誉。

Token中转站是大模型产业发展过程中诞生的新兴中间业态,折射出当前大模型产业生态的结构性问题,是值得研究的产业新动向。

1. 产业新动向:大模型应用落地普及后,下游中小客户和个人用户对算力Token的旺盛需求催生了中转业态,目前已有行业知名人物入场,赛道热度快速提升,形成了原厂-一级代理-多级中转站-终端用户的分销生态,盈利模式多元化,除传统差价外,还发展出资金沉淀、陪跑收徒等盈利方式。

2. 产业暴露的新问题:行业准入门槛低,市场鱼龙混杂,普遍存在模型掺水造假、用户信息泄露、服务商卷钱跑路等问题,大量从业者采用违规方式帮用户接入境外大模型,触碰了互联网管理法规红线,存在极高的法律风险,当前行业缺乏明确的规范和监管。

3. 研究启示:当前大模型原厂的定价和客户体系主要覆盖大B客户,没有适配中小客户和个人用户的分层需求,才催生了中转市场,后续产业政策制定和行业规范建设,需要针对这类新兴业态做出调整,兼顾用户需求和合规管理,引导行业健康发展。

返回默认

声明:快读内容全程由AI生成,请注意甄别信息。如您发现问题,请发送邮件至 run@ebrun.com 。

我是 品牌商 卖家 工厂 服务商 平台商 研究者 帮我再读一遍。

Quick Summary

This article provides a comprehensive overview of the token reselling business emerging in the age of large language models (LLMs). It outlines the risks of entering the industry for普通人 looking to profit, and shares practical tips for avoiding scams for people interested in using these reselling services.

1. Token resellers are AI computing power intermediaries that enable users to access major LLMs including GPT and Claude at low cost via a one-stop integration. They solve key pain points for individual users: official pricing is too high, topping up accounts across multiple platforms is cumbersome, and individual users cannot access official volume discounts. For casual use, the cost of tokens through resellers is just a few dollars, far lower than official subscription fees.

2. The market is no longer suitable for普通人 without existing resources to enter for arbitrage profits. The space is already crowded with intense price competition, and profit margins for resellers working with official channels are only around 30%. Most new small players shut down their sites within a week due to lack of customers and thin profits. Only players with existing private domain traffic and technical resources can turn a profit.

3. Individual users need to carefully vet resellers: they can detect diluted tokens by comparing model response styles, context window lengths, and charge details. They should also watch out for risks including unregulated access, data leaks, and scammers running off with user funds.

As large language model applications rapidly gain adoption, tokens have become a core commodity for AI operations. The rise of the token reselling sector offers important insights for brands looking to enter AI-related businesses.

1. Consumer demand and behavior: Individual users, small business owners and small developers have strong unmet demand for LLM tokens. They cannot afford high official subscription prices and find registering and topping up across multiple platforms inconvenient, so they widely accept low-cost, one-stop reselling services. Users prioritize service stability and positive brand reputation when choosing providers.

2. Marketing takeaways for established brands: Industry figures such as Justin Sun and Fu Sheng have already entered the space. They used heavy subsidies and points-based user acquisition to promote their value proposition of unified API access to all major LLMs, gaining over one million registered users in a short period, delivering strong traction for their broader businesses.

3. Risk mitigation for brands entering the space: Assisting users with unregulated access to overseas LLMs is illegal and crosses regulatory red lines. Diluting tokens, fraudulent practices, and data leaks will also severely damage brand reputation. Brands must operate strictly within a compliance framework.

Token reselling is a new business that emerged in the LLM era. Sellers considering entering the space need to understand the current market landscape, profit models and potential risks to make a rational entry decision.

1. Current market status: Early entrants once achieved monthly revenues of over one million yuan, but the market is now extremely crowded with cutthroat price competition. Profit margins for resellers sourcing tokens from official channels have shrunk to around 30%. The space is only suitable for large players with existing technology, resources and stable private domain traffic; new entrants without foundational resources are very unlikely to turn a profit, and many shut down within a week of launching.

2. Three mainstream profit models: First, arbitrage on token buy-sell spreads, with profit margins reaching over 50% (and even higher for unregulated sourcing channels). Second, revenue from idle cash: most users do not use up all the tokens they purchase, so operators can earn returns from the resulting沉淀资金. Third, training and AI consulting services, which is currently the most profitable model, with corporate consulting engagements earning thousands to tens of thousands of yuan per client.

3. Core risk warnings: Illegally assisting users to access overseas LLMs is a criminal offense in China. Exploiting official free trial quotas and sharing official accounts also carries a high risk of account bans, while fraudulent token dilution carries legal risks.

In the LLM era, tokens are a core production input for enterprises' digital transformation. The growth of the token reselling sector offers important insights for factories looking to implement AI applications and unlock new business opportunities.

1. Lowering AI implementation costs for factories: Factories use LLMs across many use cases in digital transformation, including product design, marketing content generation, and production management optimization, which often require access to multiple different models. Token resellers offer one-stop low-cost access to multiple models without the need for separate official subscriptions, drastically lowering the barrier to entry and cutting costs for small and medium-sized factories.

2. Unlocking monetization opportunities for idle token quotas: Many larger factories already have partnerships with LLM platforms that grant them very low-cost or even unlimited token allocations, most of which sit unused. Factories can share these idle quotas via compliant token reselling to unlock extra revenue from underutilized resources.

3. Lessons for digital transformation: Factories do not need high technical barriers or heavy capital investment to launch new AI-related business. They can adapt the reselling sector's asset-light resource integration model, target high unmet user demand to lower the cost of transformation trial and error. They must also prioritize compliant operations, protect user data security, and avoid crossing regulatory red lines.

Token reselling is an emerging niche sector spun out of the broader LLM industry, with clear unmet market pain points that create distinct growth opportunities for AI-focused service providers.

1. Industry development trends: As LLM applications gain adoption, overall market demand for tokens continues to grow. Small and medium-sized clients and individual users have strong unmet demand for low-cost, one-stop LLM access. The sector has evolved from an early blue ocean to a market dominated by established large players, and compliance and standardization are inevitable future trends.

2. Core current market pain points: First, official retail token prices are too high, and individual and small clients cannot access volume discount pricing. Second, subscribing to multiple separate models is cumbersome and creates high barriers to entry. Third, the market is highly fragmented and unregulated, so users cannot verify token authenticity, and face risks of data leaks and provider insolvency or fraud.

3. Actionable solution opportunities: Providers can launch token purity testing services to help users vet reliable resellers. Some players already offer this service, and testing data shows 60% of Claude reselling services dilute token volume, creating clear market demand. Providers can also launch compliant reselling services that integrate official API access to deliver stable, low-cost services to downstream users, building a trusted brand to capture a stable user base.

The rise of the token reselling sector reflects real unmet demand from downstream users in the LLM ecosystem, offering important insights and clear risk guidance for platform operators building LLM service businesses.

1. Core user demands from platforms: Users want unified API access to multiple major LLMs, lower pricing than official retail, and simplified top-up and onboarding processes to lower barriers for small and medium-sized users. This requires LLM service platforms to optimize their customer tiering frameworks and launch flexible small-usage packages to meet the differentiated needs of smaller users.

2. Operational and partnership best practices to adopt: Top early entrants used heavy subsidies and point-based promotions for user acquisition, positioning themselves around the value proposition of unified API access to all models, and gained large volumes of registered users quickly – this traction strategy is widely applicable. Platforms can also add a distribution agent model, offering agents 20%-40% commissions, to rapidly expand market reach.

3. Core risks to avoid: Reselling services must operate fully within compliance frameworks. Unauthorized cross-border access to overseas models crosses Chinese regulatory red lines. Platforms must avoid sourcing tokens via high-risk channels such as exploiting free trial quotas and sharing official accounts, which are prone to official bans. They must also implement strong user data protection and fund management to avoid data leaks and fraud risks that damage platform reputation.

Token reselling is an emerging intermediary业态 born from the development of the LLM industry. It reflects structural gaps in the current LLM ecosystem and is a noteworthy new industry development for research.

1. New industry trends: The widespread adoption of LLM applications and strong demand for computing power tokens from downstream small and medium-sized clients and individual users gave rise to the reselling业态. Well-known industry figures have already entered the space, driving rapid growth in sector popularity. A full distribution ecosystem has formed: original LLM developers → first-tier agents → multi-layer resellers → end users. Profit models have also diversified beyond traditional spread arbitrage to include cash沉淀 gains and training/consulting revenue.

2. New structural problems exposed by the sector: The industry has very low barriers to entry, leading to a fragmented and unregulated market. Problems such as token dilution and fraud, user data leaks, and providers absconding with user funds are widespread. Large numbers of operators use illegal methods to help users access overseas LLMs, crossing Chinese internet regulatory red lines and carrying severe legal risk, and the sector currently lacks clear industry standards and regulatory oversight.

3. Research takeaways: Current pricing and customer frameworks from original LLM developers are primarily designed for large enterprise clients, and do not adapt to the tiered demand of small and medium-sized clients and individual users – this gap is what spawned the reselling market. Future industrial policy development and industry standard setting will need to adjust to accommodate this emerging业态, balancing user demand with compliance management to guide healthy industry development.

Disclaimer: The "Quick Summary" content is entirely generated by AI. Please exercise discretion when interpreting the information. For issues or corrections, please email run@ebrun.com .

I am a Brand Seller Factory Service Provider Marketplace Seller Researcher Read it again.

|张宁洢

大模型时代,Token成为了最重要的流通货币。参与者们用他写代码、做短剧、设计宣传海报......每一个步骤都要用到Token。

但Token的价格并不那么友好。一个AI SaaS创业者一个月就可能消耗价值上万元的Token,高昂的价格让普通创业者和中小开发者直呼:扛不住。

因此,Token中转站应运而生。Token中转站作为Al算力中间转接服务商,可以让用户以更低廉的价格,使用到GPT、Gemini、Claude 、Deepseek等国内外主流大模型。

5月1日,波场创始人孙宇晨推出AI中转站B.AI,号称“一个API Key= Claude+ GPT+ Gemini+ 国产大模型全系列”的口号。他还公开表示,一天至少补贴10万元人民币、100亿Token。孙宇晨5月7日称,平台注册用户已突破170万。

一起加入的还有猎豹创始人傅盛。他创建的AI中转站Easyrouter,通过统一接口帮助用户便捷调用GPT、Claude、Gemini、DeepSeek等40余个主流大模型,并用折扣与积分补贴拉新。

名人入局似乎更证实了Token中转站的热度,然而,对于普通人来说,这真是“一夜暴富”的好机会吗,“做中转站月入百万”的神话是一条真实可复制的发财捷径吗?

在市场鱼龙混杂的情况下,这个答案似乎并不明朗。

Token中转站是门好生意吗?

对于AI行业的个人客户或中小企业客户来说,Token中转站的存在大幅降低了模型的使用成本。比如,订阅最便宜的GPT Plus也需要一个月140元左右,但他们中的很多人Token使用量非常小,通过中转站往往只需几块钱就能拿到一百万Token。

而且对于这些用户来说,使用国外大模型相对比较困难。一方面,许多人不懂汇率差价,不懂各国模型订阅价差和海外官方拿货规则,信息差大;另一方面,模型在不断发展更新,不同工作适配的最佳使用模型也不同,这就导致用户需要充值很多不同的模型,不仅麻烦,而且浪费。

中转站的出现,则完美解决了这些问题,用户只需要在一个地方充值即可使用多个模型,节省了大量的时间精力成本。

AI从业者小平教练告诉Tech星球,谷歌、OpenAI等官方平台不会直接与个人小用户进行合作,而是批发给一级代理,即各地的授权服务商。这些一级代理拿到的是最新大模型的接口,加上一定利润后向下游提供。普通中转站或开发者会找这类一级代理接入,成本比官方零售低。

除了这样传统的中转站模式,市面上中转站的进货渠道可谓是五花八门。

很多大模型平台注册企业账号后可以获取官方赠送的免费额度,比如OpenAI等平台对创业型公司有扶持,可以免费使用好几个月,一些人会批量注册账号,集中起来变成一个“号池”,用户在使用的时候,消耗的是号池里所有账号注册后可免费使用额度的总额。

部分大厂员工所在的公司本身就拿到了极便宜的 Token价格,甚至无限量使用,他们就会私下搭建中转站,把自己的API私钥接进去,成本非常低,再发展代理对外售卖。

还有人会批量购买大模型平台的会员账号,每个账号分给20人使用,即可分摊成本赚取差价。不过,这些钻空子的渠道往往都面临着被官方封号的风险。

这些中转站可以发展自己的下游,将Token以低价分销给不同的下游,不同层级靠拿货价和售价之间的差额获利。也可以寻找代理负责推广,拿到一个便宜的 Token接口,然后开多个API子接口给代理商,代理商充值后去销售Token,一般会分到其20%–40%的佣金。

做中转站并没有过高的技术壁垒,有现成开源框架可用,单人就能实现搭建落地,既不需要重资产投入,又有刚需强的精准客户群体,看起来是一门适合普通人做的好生意。

有人月入百万、有人一周闭站

但现阶段,并非普通人入局Token中转站的最佳时机。

小平教练告诉Tech星球,确实有一部分人通过这门生意赚到了不少钱,但这样的案例大部分发生在三个月前,那时这个赛道还没有现在这么拥挤,Token使用量也正处在暴增阶段。“身边有人曾经通过做Token中转站实现了月入百万,但他们的盈利方式有很多种,绝对不止靠赚Token差价,还有很大一部分来自于收学员和做陪跑服务。”

第一种,就是赚取Token差价,利润率能达到50%以上。比如,100个Claude Max账号,每个拆20人用,每人月付50美元。月入10万美元,净利润就能有56万人民币;如果是通过企业折扣低价购买,他们基本可以拿到七折的价格,再加价卖给散户,一天处理几亿Token,日利润可以达到数万。

第二种,则是资金沉淀,很多人为了便宜而在中转站充值,但实际上用不完。比如,订阅199元的套餐,90% 的用户是消耗不完相应Token量的,这部分资金就可以被沉淀下来。

第三种,是真正能迅速获取大量利润的方式,即收学员或者做AI陪跑服务。比如,在社交平台发帖说“做中转月入几千”,从而引流私域,先发放免费资料,再进阶到让学员发88元、199元等红包进行“一对一赋能”;而针对企业部署智能体、使用中转站的陪跑服务一单就能收几千甚至上万元。

小平教练告诉Tech星球,由于用户对于中转站稳定性的追求,有固定私域流量池的人更适合做,一位在推特上有粉丝基础的AI博主做中转站,发个帖子不到24小时,11个群(每群200人)共2000–3000人直接满员,成交率极高。

而现在这个赛道竞争激烈,已经不太适合小玩家。由于技术壁垒较低、价格越来越卷,现阶段正规渠道进货的利润空间大约只能达到30%左右,差价生意越来越难做了。如果有技术、资源或内容能力基础,依然有一定的获利空间,但如果只是想做中间商赚差价,空间已经很窄,这个赛道已经变成大玩家或收徒玩家的天下。越来越多的普通玩家退出市场,甚至有人建站一星期,就因利润率低、缺乏稳定客户而闭站。

不过,市面上依然存在不少通过薅羊毛、掺水等方式赚取暴利的小商户。据Tech星球观测,一个向下游报价0.18元兑换1刀的中转站,一亿Token能够卖到36元,而其对应层级的上游报价为10元/一亿 Token,其利润率超70%,这样的中转站往往存在很多合规和质量问题,极易被封号。

2026年5月,一个名为“西瓜的皮”的Token中转站的站长被上海警方刑事拘留,37天后转为取保候审。这位站长,去外网批量注册或购买GPT、Claude等境外大模型的账号,攒在一起,通过海外服务器当跳板,把接口转卖给国内用户,让国内用户也可以使用海外AI。

这种行为无疑于帮助用户魔法上网,在法律上与私搭VPN高度相似,都属于违规打通跨境信道,触碰了法规红线,不少Token中转站都采用了这种方式,法律风险极高。

中转站鱼龙混杂:以次充好,数据泄露

由于进货渠道多样,为了赚取更多利润,不少个人中转站会采用掺水的方式欺骗用户,甚至有人倒卖用户信息或直接卷钱跑路。

hvoy.ai合伙人Stars 404告诉Tech星球,现在寻找一个靠谱的中转站并不容易。

许多中转站的Token是“掺水”的。所谓“掺水”,就是在后台偷偷用便宜模型或者是限制了规格,比如用较便宜的国内模型去替代国外模型,最典型的就是用Deepseek去代替国外模型的。

一位用户在社交媒体上分享,他通过中转站使用Gemini 3.1Pro的时候,思考链都没有了,但同时段使用Gemini其他模型并未出现这种情况,用Claude 4.6 opus好几次思考链都是中文的,但他从未设置过中文思考链,大概率是直接用廉价国模掺水了。

所以除了模型名,还应该检测中转站提供模型的回答风格、上下文长度、报错信息、扣费明细等,与原模型做对比,才能辨别出纯度,Stars 404根据这些指标制作了网站hvoy.ai方便测试Token的纯度,网站后台数据显示,检测过的中转站里,Claude掺水概率最大,为60%左右,价格越便宜,质量就越无法保证,往往纯度较低。

更严重的一个问题则是信息泄露。一位用户在使用中转站提供的账号时,发现该模型可以根据用户问题提供用户曾经上传过的所有相关文件,但这些文件并不是他自己的,而是同账号其他用户上传过的,而且由于AI可能出现幻觉,甚至可能直接在新对话里把别人的文件链接给用户。

Stars 404告诉Tech星球,很多中转站都会被问过,要不要出售用户数据,这些希望购买数据的人主要是有模型蒸馏需求的第三方。但在他与中转站的交流之中发现,大部分中转站由于知道这类售卖行为违法,都不会保存,但信息泄露风险依旧是个大问题。

此外,还要注意的是,跑路的中转站不在少数。一位AI行业从业者告诉Tech星球,有些小中转站可能只提供GPT的接入,如果一段时间内,GPT封号封的比较多,就会有一批站子跑路;还有些中转站在达到收入高峰时卷钱跑路,消费者也无法追回钱款。

除了这些,使用Token中转站还存在着很多风险,比如计数虚高,变相多扣费,阉割上下文长度,缩短官方记忆窗口,联网搜索高峰期自动降配,高峰流量时切换低配模型等等,不良商家用这些方式赚取暴利,普通用户很难辨别。

目前,Token中转站市场依旧鱼龙混杂,难以保证产品质量和用户信息安全,未来还需要长期的规范化管理和市场监管。

注:文/张宁洢,文章来源:Tech星球(公众号ID:tech618),本文为作者独立观点,不代表亿邦动力立场。

文章来源:Tech星球

广告
微信
朋友圈

这么好看,分享一下?

朋友圈 分享

APP内打开

+1
+1
微信好友 朋友圈 新浪微博 QQ空间
关闭
收藏成功
发送
/140 0