广告
加载中

欧洲 正在“劝退”一批中国卖家

AMZ123 2026-06-09 09:28
AMZ123 2026/06/09 09:28

邦小白快读

EN
全文速览

本文核心讲欧洲对中国跨境电商的监管全面收紧,原本被视为中国跨境卖家第二增长曲线的欧洲市场,已经从好进入变成难留下,给想要进入欧洲市场的普通从业者梳理了清楚的现状和实操方向。

1.核心变化梳理:欧盟近几年陆续出台政策,先是2021年取消22欧元以下进口商品VAT免税,2026年7月起将对150欧元以下直邮小包征收每类3欧元的固定关税,同时通过GPSR、DSA规则把产品安全责任前置到上架前,要求平台承担审核责任,目前已经对Temu开出15.76亿元人民币的罚单,Shein也被调查。

2.实操方向:未来欧洲市场会明显分层,依靠低值直邮走量、把合规当临时补丁的卖家会逐步被淘汰,只有提前做好全链路合规、把欧洲当成本地市场运营的从业者才能长期立足。

欧洲市场监管转向,给中国出海品牌带来了新的挑战与机会,需要品牌调整原有策略适配新规则。

1.当前环境变化:欧洲已经填平了跨境电商的税务成本洼地,补上了责任真空,所有品牌都要和本土商家承担一样的合规成本,原来依靠低价、钻规则漏洞的竞争逻辑失效;目前欧洲通胀后超过60%消费者主动寻找降级消费的低价选择,市场依然有充足的低价需求,但需求要在合规框架内满足。

2.品牌经营方向:未来品牌要从选品阶段就融入合规要求,提前落实欧盟责任人、产品标签、售后链路等配置,走本地化长期经营路线,随着投机性卖家被淘汰,合规经营的品牌能获得更公平的竞争环境,欧洲成熟稳定的消费市场依然能给品牌带来长期增长空间。

当前欧洲监管政策全面收紧,给中国出海卖家带来了明确的风险与机会,卖家需要及时调整经营策略。

1.政策变化梳理:欧盟已经形成统一的监管方向,2021年取消22欧元以下进口商品VAT免税,2026年7月起对150欧元以下直邮小包征收固定关税,通过GPSR将产品安全责任前置,要求平台承担卖家审核、非法商品治理责任,目前执法已经落地,Temu被罚2亿欧元,Shein被调查,违规已经有明确代价。

2.风险提示:依靠低值直邮走量赚钱、把合规当成临时补丁的卖家会率先被淘汰,新增的成本和查验会直接吃掉原本微薄的利润,生存空间会持续收窄。

3.机会提示:欧洲依然具备成熟消费市场、稳定需求和多站点增长空间,淘汰投机卖家后,愿意提前做好全链路合规、做本地化经营的卖家反而能获得更干净的竞争环境,长期发展空间更大。

欧洲跨境电商监管转向,给出海供货的中国工厂带来了新的生产要求和商业机会,也给工厂做数字化出海提供了明确启示。

1.生产设计新要求:欧洲要求商品上架前就必须明确标注制造商、欧盟责任人、完整产品安全信息,信息需要覆盖标签、包装、商品详情页多个渠道,这要求工厂在生产设计阶段就要把合规要求融入,不能等产品生产完成后再补合规补丁,增加额外成本。

2.商业机会变化:原来靠低价低值走量的需求会逐步萎缩,依赖违规压缩成本的小卖家会被淘汰,有合规生产能力、能稳定供应合格产品的工厂,会获得更多长期稳定的订单合作机会。

3.转型启示:工厂不能只盯着低价走量的订单,要主动提升自身合规能力,配合品牌和卖家做全链路合规适配,转向长期稳定的本地化供货合作,才能抓住欧洲市场的长期机会。

欧洲监管的全面收紧,重塑了跨境服务商的生意模式,给服务商指明了新的发展方向。

1.行业发展趋势:原来卖家只需要单点的低价代办服务,比如单独注册VAT、找欧代、做清关,现在监管要求卖家实现全链路合规,原来的单点服务模式已经满足不了需求,低价代办的利润空间会越来越窄。

2.客户核心痛点:卖家分散对接多个服务商,很容易出现合规漏洞,触发监管处罚,卖家需要能覆盖全流程的合规支持,解决应对欧洲监管的整体问题,而不是单个环节的交差。

3.新的机会方向:未来能把税务、产品资料、清关、海外仓、售后退货等全环节整合,给卖家提供一站式闭环合规解决方案的服务商,会变得非常稀缺,能获得更高的利润和更多的客户,行业竞争核心会从价格转向整合服务能力。

欧洲监管转向要求平台承担更多合规责任,平台的角色和运营策略都需要做出调整。

1.监管要求变化:欧盟通过GPSR和DSA规则,明确要求平台必须承担卖家审核、非法商品治理、系统性风险识别的责任,不能再给不合规卖家提供服务,目前已经有Temu因为没做好风险识别被处以约15.76亿元人民币的罚款,执法已经落到大型平台身上。

2.平台最新实践:目前亚马逊欧洲站已经将GPSR合规纳入账户健康管理页面,要求卖家按品牌和商品提交合规信息,同时将德国市场的EPR责任和商品销售权限绑定,前置审核环节。

3.运营调整方向:未来平台要把合规要求前置到招商和上架环节,拉长审核周期,强化高风险品类管理,及时下架不合规商品,淘汰不合规卖家,既满足欧盟的监管要求,也能优化平台整体经营生态,降低自身合规风险。

本文梳理了欧洲跨境电商监管转向的完整脉络,分析了动因与影响,给跨境电商产业研究提供了新的内容。

1.产业新动向:欧洲对跨境电商的定位已经从“便利贸易通道”转向“责任市场”,形成了税务填平缺口、责任前置到上架前、统一执法的组合监管框架,监管已经从政策制定阶段落地到具体执法层面,2026年还将进一步落地统一的低值小包关税,完成全体系收紧。

2.新出现的产业问题:跨境电商缩短了传统零售的长链条,带来了责任漂移、海关监管两难、本土企业公平竞争受损等新问题,原有监管体系无法适配新的跨境零售模式,催生了本次监管重构。

3.商业模式变革:原有依靠流量放大、低价冲量的跨境电商商业模式已经难以为继,产业会出现明显分层,合规化、本地化、全链路运营的新商业模式正在逐步形成,未来跨境电商欧洲市场的竞争门槛会大幅提升。

返回默认

声明:快读内容全程由AI生成,请注意甄别信息。如您发现问题,请发送邮件至 run@ebrun.com 。

我是 品牌商 卖家 工厂 服务商 平台商 研究者 帮我再读一遍。

Quick Summary

This article centers on the comprehensive tightening of regulations on Chinese cross-border e-commerce in Europe. Once regarded as the second growth curve for Chinese cross-border sellers, the European market has shifted from an accessible market to one where retaining a foothold has become increasingly difficult. It outlines the clear current situation and practical guidance for ordinary practitioners looking to enter the European market.

1. Key changes: The EU has rolled out a series of new policies in recent years. In 2021, it abolished the VAT exemption for imported goods under 22 euros. Starting from July 2026, a fixed customs duty of 3 euros per item will be imposed on direct-mail small packages under 150 euros. Meanwhile, the GPSR and DSA regulations have shifted product safety responsibility to the pre-listing stage, requiring platforms to assume auditing obligations. So far, Temu has been fined 1.576 billion RMB, and Shein is also under investigation.

2. Practical guidance: The European market will see clear stratification going forward. Sellers who rely on low-value direct mailing for volume and treat compliance as a temporary fix will be gradually phased out. Only practitioners who implement end-to-end compliance in advance and operate Europe as a local market can maintain a long-term foothold.

The shift in European regulatory policy has brought new challenges and opportunities for Chinese brands expanding overseas, requiring brands to adjust their original strategies to adapt to new rules.

1. Current environmental changes: Europe has closed the gap in cross-border e-commerce tax costs and eliminated the previous responsibility vacuum. All brands now bear the same compliance costs as local businesses, making the original competition logic based on low prices and exploiting regulatory loopholes obsolete. Despite post-inflation economic conditions, more than 60% of European consumers actively seek cheaper lower-priced options, meaning robust demand for low-priced goods remains—but this demand must be met within a compliance framework.

2. Strategic direction for brands: Going forward, brands need to integrate compliance requirements from the product selection stage, putting in place necessary configurations such as EU responsible persons, product labeling, and after-sales chains in advance, and pursue a long-term localized operation strategy. As speculative sellers are eliminated, compliant brands will enjoy a fairer competitive environment, and Europe’s mature, stable consumer market still offers long-term growth space for brands.

Comprehensive tightening of European regulatory policy has brought clear risks and opportunities for Chinese cross-border sellers, requiring sellers to adjust their business strategies in a timely manner.

1. Summary of policy changes: The EU has established a unified regulatory direction. It canceled the VAT exemption for imports under 22 euros in 2021, and will impose fixed customs duties on direct-mail small packages under 150 euros starting July 2026. Via the GPSR regulation, it has shifted product safety responsibility to the pre-sale stage, requiring platforms to take responsibility for seller audits and governance of non-compliant goods. Enforcement has already begun: Temu has been fined 200 million euros, Shein is under investigation, and violations now carry clear, tangible penalties.

2. Risk warning: Sellers who rely on low-value direct mailing for volume and treat compliance as a temporary patch will be the first to be eliminated. New compliance costs and increased inspections will directly erode already thin profit margins, and operating space will continue to narrow.

3. Opportunity outlook: Europe still boasts a mature consumer market, stable demand and growth opportunities across multiple market segments. After speculative sellers are cleared out, sellers willing to implement end-to-end compliance in advance and pursue localized operation will gain a cleaner competitive environment and greater long-term development space.

The shift in European cross-border e-commerce regulation has brought new production requirements and business opportunities for Chinese factories that supply cross-border sellers, while also offering clear insights for factories pursuing digital direct-to-consumer expansion.

1. New requirements for production and design: Europe requires clear labeling of manufacturers, EU responsible persons, and complete product safety information before goods can be listed, with this information required across labels, packaging, and product detail pages. This requires factories to integrate compliance requirements into the production and design stage, rather than adding compliance retrofits after production is completed, which incurs extra costs.

2. Shifts in business opportunities: Demand for low-price, low-quality high-volume goods will gradually shrink, as small sellers that cut costs via non-compliance are eliminated. Factories with compliant production capabilities that can stably supply qualified products will gain more long-term, stable order cooperation opportunities.

3. Insights for transformation: Factories should not only focus on high-volume low-price orders. They need to proactively improve their own compliance capabilities, cooperate with brands and sellers to achieve end-to-end compliance alignment, and shift to long-term stable localized supply cooperation to capture long-term opportunities in the European market.

Comprehensive tightening of European regulation has reshaped the business model of cross-border service providers and pointed to a new direction for industry development.

1. Industry development trends: Previously, sellers only needed fragmented low-price ad-hoc services, such as one-off VAT registration, securing an EU responsible person, or customs clearance. Now, regulation requires sellers to achieve end-to-end compliance, so the original fragmented service model can no longer meet demand, and profit margins for low-price ad-hoc services will continue to shrink.

2. Core customer pain points: When sellers work with multiple fragmented service providers, compliance gaps are common and can trigger regulatory penalties. Sellers need full-process compliance support to solve overall challenges of meeting European regulatory requirements, rather than just checking boxes for individual links.

3. New opportunity directions: Going forward, service providers that can integrate all links—including tax, product documentation, customs clearance, overseas warehousing, and after-sales returns—to provide a one-stop closed-loop compliance solution will be extremely scarce. These providers will capture higher margins and more customers, and industry competition will shift from competing on price to competing on integrated service capabilities.

The shift in European regulation requires platforms to assume greater compliance responsibility, forcing adjustments to both platforms’ core role and operation strategies.

1. Changes to regulatory requirements: Via the GPSR and DSA regulations, the EU explicitly requires platforms to take responsibility for seller audits, governance of illegal goods, and systemic risk identification, and prohibits platforms from providing services to non-compliant sellers. Enforcement has already targeted large platforms: Temu has been fined approximately 1.576 billion RMB for failing to implement adequate risk identification.

2. Latest platform practices: Amazon’s European site has already integrated GPSR compliance into its account health dashboard, requiring sellers to submit compliance information by brand and product. It has also tied EPR obligations in Germany to product selling permissions, moving audits to the pre-listing stage.

3. Direction for operational adjustment: Going forward, platforms need to embed compliance requirements into the merchant onboarding and pre-listing stages, extend audit cycles, strengthen management of high-risk categories, proactively remove non-compliant products and eliminate non-compliant sellers. This not only meets EU regulatory requirements but also improves the platform’s overall operating ecosystem and reduces the platform’s own compliance risk.

This article outlines the complete trajectory of the regulatory shift for cross-border e-commerce in Europe, analyzes its driving forces and impacts, and adds new insights to industrial research on cross-border e-commerce.

1. New industry trends: Europe’s positioning of cross-border e-commerce has shifted from "a convenient trade channel" to "an accountable market", forming a combined regulatory framework of closing tax loopholes, shifting responsibility to the pre-listing stage, and unified law enforcement. Regulation has already moved from policy formulation to concrete enforcement. In 2026, unified customs duties for low-value small packages will take effect, completing the full-system tightening.

2. Emerging industrial issues: Cross-border e-commerce shortens the long supply chain of traditional retail, bringing new problems such as shifting responsibility, dilemmas for customs regulation, and unfair competition for local enterprises. Existing regulatory systems could not adapt to the new cross-border retail model, driving this current regulatory restructuring.

3. Business model transformation: The original cross-border e-commerce business model, which relies on traffic scaling and low-price volume growth, is no longer viable. The industry will see clear stratification, and a new business model of compliance, localization, and end-to-end operation is gradually taking shape. The barrier to competition in the European cross-border e-commerce market will rise substantially going forward.

Disclaimer: The "Quick Summary" content is entirely generated by AI. Please exercise discretion when interpreting the information. For issues or corrections, please email run@ebrun.com .

I am a Brand Seller Factory Service Provider Marketplace Seller Researcher Read it again.

5月28日,欧盟委员会在官网宣布,对中国跨境电商平台Temu处以2亿欧元罚款,约合人民币15.76亿元。理由直指平台没有充分识别、分析和评估非法商品在平台上销售带来的系统性风险。

这张罚单,把欧洲市场的矛盾推到了台前:这个被视为“第二增长曲线”的蓝海,正以前所未有的速度,从“好进入”变成“难留下”。

过去,欧洲是中国卖家分散风险的“避风港”。美国市场关税政策反复横跳,于是大家奔向欧洲;亚马逊封号潮后,大家去做多站点。欧洲似乎是一个只要把货铺进去,就能获得增长的“应许之地”。

但现在,这个“应许之地”变天了。欧盟不再把跨境电商当作一条便利的“贸易通道”,而是开始将其视为与本土零售无异的 “责任市场” 。

欧洲对跨境电商的态度,正在经历一次明显转向。

一边是市场需要。欧洲需要跨境电商带来的供给效率、价格竞争和消费选择,也需要它推动零售数字化、跨境物流和平台经济继续发展。

另一边是监管压力。低值小包越来越多,平台交易越来越集中,境外卖家越来越分散,欧洲不可能继续只把它当成一条便利通道。

所以这几年,欧洲的动作看起来分散,方向却很一致:把跨境电商重新拉回税务、产品、平台和执法体系。

最先被填上的,是低值进口商品的税务缺口。

AMZ123了解到,在2021年之前,欧盟企业在境内销售商品要缴纳VAT,但来自欧盟以外、价值不超过22欧元的进口商品可以免征VAT。同样卖给欧洲消费者,本土商家和境外卖家承担的税务成本并不一样。

2021年,欧盟取消22欧元以下进口商品VAT免税。此后,进入欧盟销售的商品无论价值高低,都要缴纳增值税。低值商品在增值税上的成本洼地,先被填平了一层。

到2026年,收口进一步落到低值小包本身。欧盟理事会已批准,从2026年7月1日起,对150欧元以下、直接寄给欧盟消费者的小包商品征收临时固定关税,按包裹内不同税则子目对应的商品类别计收,每类3欧元。

值得注意的是,这一步也有成员国试水后的教训。法国、意大利等市场此前尝试单独对低值包裹收费,但单国先加税,很容易带来“择口岸清关”:货没有真正减少,只是绕开先加税的口岸,换到其他欧盟国家清关,再通过陆运进入目标市场。

欧盟层面的统一收口,重点不只是一笔新费用。它要压缩低值包裹利用成员国政策差异绕道进场的空间,把低值进口重新拉回统一的税务和海关框架里。

税务之后,责任也被推到更前面。

GPSR把产品安全责任提前到上架前。商品进入欧洲市场,需要说清楚制造商是谁、欧盟责任人是谁、产品安全信息是否完整。相关信息不仅要出现在标签、包装和随附文件里,也要展示在商品详情页中。

平台也被放进责任链。GPSR要求平台不得继续为不符合要求的卖家提供服务;DSA则进一步要求平台承担卖家审核、非法商品治理和风险识别责任。

这意味着,欧洲不再接受“先上架、先卖货、出了问题再补材料”的模式。商品要提前说清楚,平台也要提前管起来。

规则立起来之后,欧洲便开始动真格。

2025年,欧盟委员会提出“安全和可持续电商进口”工具箱,把低值包裹、不合规商品、消费者安全、欧盟合规卖家的公平竞争和环境影响放到同一个框架里处理。

同一年,DSA执法也落到更多大型平台身上。X被罚,TikTok、Meta也因透明度义务被欧委会点名,Apple、Booking.com、Google、Microsoft收到过信息请求。

到2026年,中国跨境平台被推到执法前台。Shein被调查,Temu被罚款,平台责任开始真正落到电商交易场里。

这条线走下来,欧洲监管的重心已经很清楚:

低值小包要进账,商品上架前要有人负责,平台不能只管流量,违规开始有明确代价。

这套组合拳的逻辑非常清晰:税务上,不再有洼地;责任上,不再有真空;执法上,不再有例外。

欧洲之所以如此大动干戈,是因为跨境电商彻底打破了它原有的市场秩序。根本原因在于,跨境电商把欧洲传统的零售链接压得太短了。

过去,一件商品进入欧洲市场,通常要经过进口商、报关人、分销商、本地零售商。链条长,效率未必高,但责任清楚。海关找得到进口商,消费者找得到零售商,产品出了问题,也能顺着链条往回追。

现在,这条链被平台改短了。

境外卖家直接面对欧洲消费者,平台负责流量和交易,物流商把小包送到家门口。货到了,责任却被分散到卖家、平台、物流、支付、售后等多个环节。欧洲要追问的不再只有“谁卖的”,还包括“谁进口的”“谁负责产品安全”“谁处理投诉”“平台有没有提前审核”。

答案往往是分散的、模糊的。卖家、平台、物流、支付各管一段,出了问题却很难找到一个完整负责的主体。这就是欧洲监管最头疼的“责任漂移”。

更麻烦的是,他们面对的不再是几十家大型贸易公司,而是成千上万个随时可以注销的跨境店铺和海量碎片化订单。申报价值、HS编码、产品描述一旦不准,风险识别就会失真。

而小包数量又把这个问题放大。

AMZ123了解到,到2025年底,欧盟低值进口包裹数量已接近58.8亿件,高于2024年的46亿件。低值包裹在欧盟进口件数中的占比,也从2022年的约92%升至2025年的约98%。更关键的是,这些包裹平均单价不到9欧元,却占用了海关绝大部分进口处理量。按来源看,中国占低值进口商品数量的93%、进口价值的78%。

单个包裹不贵,但数量足够大,SKU足够碎,批次足够散。

这让海关陷入两难:查得细,清关和物流会被拖慢;放得快,低报、错报、不合规商品又可能混进市场。跨境电商追求快,监管却需要慢下来核查,矛盾就在这里。

最后这些压力又会传到本土企业身上。

欧洲零售本来就是一门薄利生意。McKinsey和EuroCommerce的《State of Retail 2024—Europe》显示,欧洲非食品零售商仍面临显著成本和利润率压力。报告调查的非食品零售CEO中,87%将“成本和利润率压力”列为未来1–3年的重点议题,其中71%将其列为前三大优先事项。

偏偏通胀之后,欧洲消费者更愿意寻找低价替代。同一份报告显示,超过60%的消费者会主动寻找“降级消费”机会,跨境平台把大量低值商品推到消费者面前,改变的不只是订单流向,还有价格预期。

这会让本土商家更难受。它们要承担VAT、产品认证、环保包装、售后退货、知识产权等完整成本,却要和申报、产品责任、平台审核都更分散的跨境商品竞争。

因此,欧盟各国的本土零售商们不断发起倡议,要求强化对第三国卖家和平台的执法,呼吁政府对低价值进口商品加征费用,缩小跨境平台与本土零售商之间的成本差距。

本质上,欧洲本土企业不服的是,同样卖给欧洲消费者,自己按完整规则做生意,对手却可能把一部分成本留在规则之外。

这也是欧洲持续收紧监管的底层原因。它不是在“针对”中国卖家,而是在拼命把一套高效率的跨境零售系统,重新装回自己“规则至上”的市场秩序里。

当规则从“流量逻辑”切换到“责任逻辑”,整个跨境生态的位置都将被重新定义。

卖家、平台、服务商还能继续做欧洲,但不能再只守着原来的分工。

对卖家来说,最明显的将是“分层”。

首先被淘汰的,是依靠,低值直邮、走量赚钱的卖家。几欧元、十几欧元的小商品,未来每多一道费用、多一次查验、多一次退货,利润就可能被吃掉。很多SKU还能卖,但卖完一算账,发现是给平台和物流打工。

其次感到阵痛的,是把合规当成“临时补丁”的卖家。他们总是在等平台催了,才去找欧代、补标签、改包装。GPSR生效后,连一些英国本土小商家都因为找不到欧盟责任人、修改产品标签成本太高,而暂停了对欧盟的销售。这类卖家在欧洲的生存空间将越来越窄。

真正能留下的,是把欧洲当“本地市场”来做的卖家。

它们不会等平台催了才找欧代、补文件、改包装,而是从选品开始就想清楚:这个产品能不能清关,出了问题谁接消费者,退货退到哪里,说明书和警示语当地人能不能看懂。

这类卖家成本更高,速度也未必最快,但遇到查验、下架、退货和投诉时,更不容易被一把掀翻。

对平台而言,角色正在发生转变。

过去,平台是“流量放大器”,卖家进得快,SKU上得多,价格打得低,流量就能转起来。现在,平台正在变成进入欧洲市场的第一道门槛。

如亚马逊欧洲站已经把GPSR合规放进AccountHealth页面,卖家要按品牌和offer提交合规信息;德国市场的包装、电子电气等EPR责任,也已经和商品销售权限绑在一起。

材料入口变多,审核周期变长,高风险品类更容易被限流,链接下架更快。

最后,服务商的生意模式也将被重塑。

过去,服务商卖的是单点服务:VAT注册、欧代、认证、清关、海外仓。卖家要的是便宜、快、能交差。

未来,真正的价值在于“一站式解决方案”——帮助卖家把税务、产品资料、清关、海外仓售后、退货维修等所有环节,整合成一个闭环。低价代办的空间会越来越窄,而能“帮卖家把整个欧洲生意接住”的服务商,将变得极其稀缺。

这一轮变化筛的不是单个环节。卖家不能只靠冲量,平台不能只靠放量,服务商不能只靠代办。

欧洲市场还在,只是吃法变了。

如果一个市场没有增长、没有消费力、没有平台空间,卖家大可以转身离开。但欧洲不一样,它的多国站点、成熟消费和稳定需求,依然会吸引中国卖家继续投入。

只是从现在开始,欧洲不会再只是一个“把货卖进去”的市场。

它会越来越检验卖家的长期经营基本功:能不能把价格优势放进规则里,把供应链效率放进责任里,把平台流量放进本地化经营里。

这不是一个轻松的市场。但也正因为不轻松,它会把投机者挡在外面,把愿意长期经营的人留下来。

注:文/AMZ123,文章来源:AMZ123跨境电商(公众号ID:amz123net),本文为作者独立观点,不代表亿邦动力立场。

文章来源:AMZ123跨境电商

广告
微信
朋友圈

这么好看,分享一下?

朋友圈 分享

APP内打开

+1
+1
微信好友 朋友圈 新浪微博 QQ空间
关闭
收藏成功
发送
/140 0