广告
加载中

对话GXG吴磊:在价格内卷的废墟上重建传统男装的品牌尊严

李梦琪 2026-06-05 10:59
李梦琪 2026/06/05 10:59

邦小白快读

EN
全文速览

本文是GXG总经理对当前国内男装行业发展现状的分享,以及GXG对抗价格内卷的实操经验,核心干货总结如下:

1. 当前男装行业陷入无底线价格内卷,多数卡在中间定位的时尚通勤男装成为夹心层,生存困难。核心原因是早年很多品牌为了冲电商红利,盲目做线上专供款,打乱价格体系,毁掉了消费者信任,忽视了长期品牌沉淀。

2. GXG对抗内卷的实操做法:过去三年主动做组织减法,优化关掉10%以上的低效门店,严控折扣,正价店收仓接近8折,刻意弱化对单一电商渠道的依赖,把精力放在打磨产品版型、质量、审美和用户体验上。

3. 品牌经营核心逻辑:产品和品牌是前面的“1”,营销、科技只是后面的“0”,企业要接受不增长,慢下来沉淀才能穿越周期。

本文针对当前男装价格内卷的现状,分享了传统品牌破局的思路,对各类服装品牌经营有较高参考价值,核心干货如下:

1. 行业现状与消费趋势:当前男装行业消费中间层不断缩减,户外风格分流了传统男装需求,国内消费者审美正在持续提升,未来圈层化、小众化品牌会迎来发展机遇,低价参数内卷的模式终将被淘汰。

2. 传统品牌常见的误区:早年为了冲电商规模大量做线上专供款,导致线上线下价格严重偏离,透支消费者信任;盲目追求持续高增长,忽视品牌长期文化沉淀,没有建立起核心的品牌可信资产。

3. 破局方向:主动做组织减法,关低效门店、降库存、控折扣稳定价格体系,弱化对单一渠道的依赖;品牌传播转向审美穿搭与人文价值表达,不再比拼面料参数和价格,接受阶段性不增长,长期沉淀品牌资产。

本文梳理了当前男装行业的风险、机会与可借鉴经验,能帮助服装卖家理清经营方向,核心干货如下:

1. 当前行业风险:整个行业陷入无底线价格内卷,定位中端的时尚休闲男装生存空间被严重挤压,盲目追逐流量红利、跟风蹭户外风口、一味追求短期高增长,会毁掉品牌根基,最终陷入信任崩塌的死结。

2. 潜在市场机会:户外风是当前行业最大增长点,其中近郊休闲露营等大众细分场景存在差异化机会;随着新一代消费者美育水平提升,审美在线的小众圈层品牌拥有很大成长空间。

3. 可借鉴的应对方法:主动优化低效门店,严控折扣稳定价格体系,避免线上线下价格混乱,刻意弱化对单一渠道的依赖;不要盲目跟风风口,走差异化细分路线,打磨产品品质与审美,接受不增长,长期沉淀用户信任。

本文透露出男装品牌端的需求变化,给服装工厂的发展带来不少启示,核心干货如下:

1. 产品生产与设计需求变化:当前品牌端已经从过去比拼低价、面料参数的走量模式,转向追求产品设计质感、审美表达与人文价值的品牌化模式,对符合新消费审美、满足细分场景需求的产品有大量新增需求。

2. 商业合作机会:过去很多品牌选择全链路自营,重资产模式在大环境下行时很容易被拖垮,品牌端越来越认可专业分工,工厂可以发挥生产端的专业优势,抓住新一代小众品牌崛起的浪潮,拓展代工合作机会。

3. 数字化转型启示:头部品牌已经实现线下用户数据全维度打通的数字化落地,工厂也需要推进自身数字化升级,才能更好匹配品牌端对产品设计、交付的差异化、个性化需求,提升自身竞争力。

本文清晰呈现了当前男装行业的发展趋势、品牌客户的核心痛点,给服装相关服务商指明了发展方向,核心干货如下:

1. 行业发展趋势:当前国内服装行业正处于转型期,过去依赖低价、参数内卷的粗放经营模式会被淘汰,行业未来会向品牌化、审美化、小众圈层化方向发展,会有一大批新品牌崛起,带来大量服务需求。

2. 客户核心痛点:传统中端男装品牌普遍面临增长焦虑、价格体系混乱、品牌信任资产崩塌、流量焦虑、组织臃肿低效的问题;新一代创业型品牌缺乏配套的产业链、品牌营销、数字化运营等专业服务支持。

3. 业务发展方向:服务商可以针对不同品牌的痛点,推出对应解决方案,围绕新一代小众品牌的需求,提供审美设计、品牌传播、数字化工具等配套服务,帮助品牌沉淀长期信任资产,走差异化品牌化路线,避开价格内卷。

本文透露出品牌商家对平台的核心诉求,也给平台的招商、运营管理带来诸多启示,核心干货如下:

1. 品牌商家的核心痛点与需求:过去很多品牌过度依赖平台电商红利,为了冲规模纷纷推出线上专供款、低价打折冲量,最终导致品牌线上线下价格体系混乱,消费者信任被透支,很多品牌已经意识到问题,开始寻求去单一渠道依赖,希望平台能支持品牌长期化经营。

2. 平台运营管理的调整方向:平台应当调整单纯引导商家拼价格、拼规模的流量逻辑,打造更有利于品牌长期沉淀的运营环境,出台规则保护品牌价格体系,减少对品牌价格体系的冲击,帮助品牌建立消费者信任。

3. 平台招商方向:未来审美在线的圈层化、小众化新品牌会大量崛起,平台可以针对性布局,引入这类符合新一代消费者需求的新品牌,丰富平台品类结构,抓住行业转型带来的新增长点。

本文是头部男装品牌操盘手对行业的深度思考,呈现了中国服装产业的新动向与新问题,为产业研究提供了一手样本,核心干货如下:

1. 产业新动向:当前国内男装行业陷入价格内卷,传统中端定位的男装品牌集体陷入增长困境,行业竞争逻辑从过去的规模、价格、参数竞争,转向品牌审美、文化价值的竞争;随着新一代消费者美育水平提升,加上国内成熟的产业链基础,未来会有大批小众圈层品牌崛起,行业不会越来越集中,反而会走向细分。

2. 产业新问题:中国服装行业改革开放后四十多年一直走短期规模扩张的路线,绝大多数企业缺乏长期品牌文化沉淀,没有建立起真正的品牌信任资产;国内企业普遍陷入高增长路径依赖,难以接受阶段性不增长,很多企业在规模做大后因为盲目追求增长陷入品质下滑的死循环。

3. 新商业模式探索:GXG主动做减法、关低效店、控价格、接受不增长、重产品品牌轻营销规模的经营模式,为传统服装品牌穿越周期提供了新的研究样本,值得深入研究。

返回默认

声明:快读内容全程由AI生成,请注意甄别信息。如您发现问题,请发送邮件至 run@ebrun.com 。

我是 品牌商 卖家 工厂 服务商 平台商 研究者 帮我再读一遍。

Quick Summary

This article shares insights from GXG's General Manager on the current state of China's men's apparel industry, along with GXG's practical experience combating destructive price competition. Key takeaways are as follows:

1. The men's apparel industry is currently trapped in a race to the bottom on pricing. Most mid-positioned fashion casual menswear brands have been caught in the middle, facing severe survival challenges. The core root cause dates back to earlier years, when many brands rushed to capitalize on e-commerce growth by blindly launching online-exclusive lines, which disrupted their pricing systems, eroded consumer trust, and led them to neglect long-term brand building.

2. GXG's practical approach to fighting price competition: Over the past three years, it has actively streamlined its organization, closing more than 10% of inefficient offline stores, strictly controlling discount levels (full-price stores now sell inventory at an average of nearly 80% of original price), deliberately reducing reliance on a single e-commerce channel, and refocusing resources on refining product fit, quality, aesthetic design, and user experience.

3. Core logic of brand operation: Products and brand are the "1" that comes first, while marketing and technology are just the "0s" that follow. Enterprises need to accept periods of no growth, slow down to build long-term value, and only in this way can they navigate industry cycles.

Against the backdrop of rampant price competition in today's men's apparel market, this article shares breakout strategies for traditional apparel brands, offering high-value reference for apparel brands of all types. Key insights are as follows:

1. Industry status and consumer trends: The mid-tier consumer segment for men's apparel is shrinking steadily, while outdoor styles have diverted demand from traditional menswear. Chinese consumers' aesthetic standards are continuously improving. In the future, niche, community-focused brands will see major growth opportunities, and the race-to-the-bottom price competition model will eventually be phased out.

2. Common pitfalls for traditional brands: In earlier years, many brands launched large volumes of online-exclusive products to chase e-commerce scale, leading to severe price divergence between online and offline channels and eroding consumer trust. They also blindly pursued sustained high growth, neglected long-term cultural brand building, and failed to build core trusted brand equity.

3. Breakout strategies: Proactively streamline organization, close inefficient stores, reduce inventory, and control discounts to stabilize pricing systems, and reduce dependence on single channels. Shift brand communication to focus on aesthetic styling and humanistic value expression, instead of competing on fabric parameters and pricing. Accept periods of temporary no growth to build brand equity over the long term.

This article sorts out the current risks, opportunities and actionable insights in the men's apparel industry, helping apparel sellers clarify their operational direction. Key takeaways are as follows:

1. Current industry risks: The entire industry is trapped in cutthroat price competition, and the living space for mid-positioned fashion casual menswear brands has been severely squeezed. Blindly chasing traffic dividends, jumping on the outdoor trend bandwagon, and focusing solely on short-term high growth will destroy a brand's foundation and ultimately lead to a fatal collapse of consumer trust.

2. Potential market opportunities: The outdoor trend is the largest growth driver in the current industry, with differentiated opportunities in mass niche scenarios such as suburban casual camping. As the aesthetic literacy of the new generation of consumers rises, niche community-focused brands with strong aesthetic appeal have enormous room for growth.

3. Actionable coping strategies: Proactively optimize and eliminate inefficient stores, strictly control discounts to stabilize pricing systems and avoid price confusion between online and offline channels, and deliberately reduce reliance on a single sales channel. Avoid blindly following trends, pursue a differentiated niche positioning, refine product quality and aesthetic design, accept periods of no growth, and build consumer trust over the long term.

This article reveals shifting demand from apparel brands, offering important insights for apparel factories' future development. Key takeaways are as follows:

1. Shifts in product production and design demand: Brands have shifted away from the volume-focused model of competing on low prices and fabric parameters, and are now moving toward a brand-focused model that prioritizes product design texture, aesthetic expression and humanistic value. There is rapidly growing new demand for products that align with new consumer aesthetics and meet the needs of niche segmented scenarios.

2. New business cooperation opportunities: In the past, many brands adopted full in-house vertical operations, but this asset-heavy model is extremely vulnerable to downturns. Brands are increasingly embracing specialized division of labor. Factories can leverage their production expertise, ride the wave of emerging new niche brands, and expand OEM/ODM cooperation opportunities.

3. Insights for digital transformation: Leading brands have already implemented full digital integration of offline user data. Factories also need to advance their own digital upgrades to better match brands' demand for differentiated, personalized product design and delivery, and improve their own core competitiveness.

This article clearly outlines the current development trends of China's men's apparel industry and the core pain points of brand clients, pointing out future development directions for apparel-related service providers. Key insights are as follows:

1. Industry development trends: China's apparel industry is currently in a period of transition. The old extensive operation model that relies on low prices and parameter-based competition will be eliminated. The industry will develop toward branding, aesthetic orientation, and niche community focus. A large wave of new brands will emerge, bringing massive new demand for professional services.

2. Core client pain points: Traditional mid-tier menswear brands generally face growth anxiety, chaotic pricing systems, collapsed brand trust, traffic acquisition anxiety, and bloated, inefficient organizational structures. New generation entrepreneurial brands lack support for professional services including supporting industrial chains, brand marketing, and digital operations.

3. Future business direction: Service providers can develop targeted solutions to address the pain points of different brands. Focus on the needs of the new generation of niche brands by providing supporting services including aesthetic design, brand communication, and digital tools, to help brands build long-term trusted equity, pursue a differentiated branding route, and avoid cutthroat price competition.

This article reveals brand merchants' core demands for e-commerce platforms, and offers important insights for platforms' merchant recruitment and operation management. Key takeaways are as follows:

1. Core pain points and demands of brand merchants: In the past, many brands relied excessively on e-commerce platform dividends, and launched online-exclusive lines and ran deep discount promotions to scale up quickly. This eventually led to chaotic pricing systems across online and offline channels and eroded consumer trust. Many brands have now recognized this problem, and are moving to reduce dependence on a single channel, hoping platforms will support long-term brand operation.

2. Adjustment directions for platform operation management: Platforms should revise their current traffic logic that simply pushes merchants to compete on price and scale, and build an operating environment more conducive to long-term brand building. They should introduce rules to protect brands' pricing systems, reduce disruption to brand pricing structures, and help brands build consumer trust.

3. Merchant recruitment direction: A large number of niche, community-focused new brands with strong aesthetic appeal will emerge in the future. Platforms can make targeted layouts by introducing these new brands that match the needs of the new generation of consumers, enrich the platform's product assortment, and capture new growth opportunities brought by industry transformation.

This article presents in-depth industry insights from the leader of a leading men's apparel brand, laying out new trends and new problems in China's apparel industry, and offers a first-hand sample for industrial research. Key takeaways are as follows:

1. New industrial trends: China's men's apparel industry is currently trapped in price competition, and traditional mid-positioned menswear brands are collectively facing growth stagnation. Industry competition logic has shifted from competing on scale, price and product parameters, to competing on brand aesthetic and cultural value. As the aesthetic literacy of the new generation of consumers rises, paired with China's mature industrial chain foundation, a large number of niche community-focused brands will emerge in the future. The industry will not become increasingly concentrated, but will instead fragment into specialized segments.

2. New industrial problems: For more than 40 years since China's reform and opening-up, China's apparel industry has followed a route of short-term scale expansion. The vast majority of enterprises have neglected long-term cultural brand building, and failed to build genuine trusted brand equity. Chinese enterprises generally have a path dependence on high growth, and struggle to accept periods of temporary no growth. After scaling up, many fall into a vicious cycle of declining quality driven by blind pursuit of further growth.

3. Exploration of a new business model: GXG's operation model — actively streamlining, closing inefficient stores, controlling pricing, accepting no growth, and prioritizing products and brand over marketing and scale — provides a new research sample for traditional apparel brands to navigate industry cycles, and deserves in-depth study.

Disclaimer: The "Quick Summary" content is entirely generated by AI. Please exercise discretion when interpreting the information. For issues or corrections, please email run@ebrun.com .

I am a Brand Seller Factory Service Provider Marketplace Seller Researcher Read it again.

【亿邦原创】“你卷到9.9,我就敢拼到8.8。”如今的男装市场,衣服似乎不再是审美与情绪的载体,而退化成了一场冰冷的面料参数战与无底线的价格战场。

GXG总经理吴磊在与亿邦动力董事长郑敏的沟通中直言不讳道,如果国内卷不动的品牌,又想办法把这种玩法输出到海外去。其中会引发出另一个更深层的拷问,如果增长的代价只是将低效的消耗战复制到全球,这种追求规模的边际效应还有什么意义?

“品牌要学会接受不增长。”

面对中国品牌正在集体经历的“撕裂”——一边是对持续高增长的渴望,一边是单一的规模化手段,多数企业还在试图追逐平台红利和营销轰炸来延缓“增速下滑”的现实,GXG却选择撕掉这个虚假的繁荣剧本。

过去三年,他们冷峻地给组织做减法,降库存、控折扣、关低效店,甚至刻意弱化对单一渠道的依赖。在这个崇尚快钱和神话的商业世界里,GXG慢慢尝试重构男装的审美门槛,并试图向行业证明一个常识,产品与品牌是前面的“1”,其余的营销与科技只是后面的“0”。

传统男装死于低价,生于审美?

郑敏:服装行业也是“卷”灾区,男装赛道的真实情况到底怎么样?

吴磊:坦白讲,整个国内服饰行业的发展,确实并没有大家想象得那么乐观,男装赛道更是如此。现在的关键问题是,整个男装行业的消费中间层正在不断缩减。买高端的人不受影响,低端市场基本也趋于稳定,而像我们这类定位时尚通勤、刚好卡在中间位置的品牌,就变成了最难受的“夹心层”。叠加户外品牌对男装行业的冲击,更加雪上加霜。

为什么艰难?因为这个生态位的品牌在过去十几年里,集体犯过一个方向性的错误。当年电商红利好的时候,大家盲目地冲规模、消化库存,跑去线上大量生产“专供款”,这会让产品本身和实际定价,特别是线上线下的价格严重偏离,消费者越来越觉得你的衣服对不起这个价格。因此,尽管这种玩法在短期内确实帮企业实现了爆发式增长,但也正是它,把中国传统品牌原本应该去走的、做品牌和文化沉淀的发展路径给彻底断掉了。

再加上早期不少中小服装品牌缺乏专业分工的边界感,从生产、物流到运营全都想自己做,所以当大环境不好,庞大的资产成本会瞬间把企业拖垮。你既没有品牌溢价让消费者买单,又没有轻量化的组织去对抗风险,这就成了这种类型的品牌最难受的死结。

图片

郑敏:我们一直在观察国内服饰品牌的周期更迭。很多淘品牌或传统男装,在吃到第一波电商红利、规模冲到十亿级后,往往会走向衰落,大家很容易把这归咎于“流量红利的转移”。但在我看来,品牌的核心资产其实是“可信”,它由浅入深分为信任、信赖、信仰三个层次。

从这个视角来看,你认为那些曾经风光一时的时尚休闲男装,其衰落的根本原因到底是被新渠道的流量抛弃了,还是在构筑“可信”资产的过程中,底层逻辑出了问题?

吴磊:这个问题切中了行业的要害。大家天天焦虑流量,觉得品牌不行了是因为没抓到抖音或直播间的红利,这完全是给战略失误找借口。流量永远是流动的,一个企业如果自己出了问题,通常只有两种可能:要么是产品和价格偏离了,要么是品牌深层的文化建设缺失了。

你提到品牌的“可信”是一场长线积累,我非常认同。在我的理解中,品牌绝不是一朝一夕爆火的产物,它就像一个盛满硬币的盘子。企业日常经营中的每一个细节——门卫的素养、店铺的装修、视觉的呈现,甚至电梯的响动,都是在往这个盘子里投硬币(加分),或者拿走硬币(减分)。这是一个非常缓慢且动态的累积过程。

但过去十几年,卡在中间“夹心层”的很多男装品牌实在是太急了,大家缺乏耐心去往盘子里投硬币。结果就是,当线上万亿基本盘挤掉30%到40%被退货率、优惠券凑出来的虚假数据后,大家发现品牌的“信任盘”其实早就空了。所以,不是流量抛弃了品牌,而是大家为了做一笔大生意,把最核心的“可信”基石给亲手毁掉了。

郑敏:你曾提到国内男性的“审美基础偏弱”,这在以前也是这样,为什么现在就成了经营痛点?

吴磊:以前大家有衣服穿就行,是在做生意、拼体量,审美没那么重要。但像主打设计质感、穿搭美学路线的男装品类普遍存在审美门槛问题。国内男性整体的审美基础偏弱,导致这类品牌在推广一些更有质感、更有设计表达的产品时,难度非常大。

因为从50后到90后这一代人,从小到大接受的教育就是好好读书、考好大学、娶妻生子,核心的美育教育从小就是缺失的。以前大家习惯把男装当成单纯的功能性工具,缺乏对品牌和产品长期的文化积累和沉淀。但从长远来看,行业审美一定会持续提升,谁能在这个阶段帮消费者推开审美这扇窗,谁就能占领未来的心智。

这也是为什么,我们说要跳出单一的面料参数竞争逻辑。现在国内很多新兴品牌,全都在比拼各种面料参数、技术功能,广告通篇都是冰冷的数据。这样拼到最后,就只剩下价格内卷,你卖9块9,我卖8块8,越拼越低。所以在慕尚集团内部,我们不再以面料数据作为核心的宣传抓手,转向审美、穿搭与人文价值表达,我们同样重视面料科技研发,但品牌传播重心还是会侧重穿搭美学而非参数的比拼。

对抗内卷,反直觉经营

郑敏:主动砍掉10%以上的门店,这听起来像是在“断臂求生”,对业绩打击大吗?

吴磊:我们主动优化了10%以上的店,最后复盘下来,整体业务大概只跌了3个点左右,但整个品牌的健康度完全不可同日而语了。

任何品牌,在中国开到1000个店以上,压力都会非常大。所以我们现在刻意让自己慢下来,不盲目开店,全国保留900多家优质门店,把省下来的精力用来日常打磨产品质量、版型,视觉呈现、客户体验等真正能带来高溢价的细节上。

图片

郑敏:“去电商依赖”和“管控折扣”,在实际执行中是怎么操作的?

吴磊:很多品牌觉得电商好卖,就把一件线下卖一千的衣服,转头在电商的价格体系里打折卖五百,顶多改个口袋位置。这种玩法只为了获取流量和规模,但会把品牌整个价格体系和消费者信任彻底毁掉,所以我们必须去电商依赖。

另外在折扣上,这是个无法回避的硬骨头。正经的品牌本来就不应该打折,但国内绝大多数品牌为了冲销量都做不到。目前我们通过严格的管控,正价店收仓基本能做到接近8折。你只有把价格稳住,把折扣控死,品牌才会有尊严,消费者才会觉得买你的衣服是有确定性价值的。

郑敏:GXG现在也实现了全面数字化,这和你倡导的“反科技、重人文”矛盾吗?

吴磊:这并不矛盾。目前我们线下的业务已经实现了全面的数字化落地,顾客的到店行为、消费习惯、选购偏好这些全维度的数据,全部在后台完成了打通和串联。

但我为什么说我个人在品牌经营上是“反科技”的?因为科技确实能带来效率的进步,但科技对于“品牌调性”本身的关联度暂时真的不大。到现在为止,全球所有轻奢及以上级别的品牌,没有一家在用AI去做核心的主视觉内容,顶多特定节点做个虚拟人玩一玩趣味营销。科技永远是理性的,而人文和情感才是品牌的根基。数字化是帮我们看清路的工具,但怎么在路上走出美感,还得靠人本身。

郑敏:你怎么理解“产品是1,营销是0;品牌是1,科技是0”这个观点?

吴磊:这件事源于我儿子前段时间在饭桌上问我,爸爸,你们企业的价值观是什么?我当时直接被问住了,因为市面上大多数企业价值观都写得太虚了,我一下想不出价值观究竟意味着什么。后来他给了我一个答案:你们不就是做衣服的吗,好好把衣服做好,让消费者喜欢,就这么简单。

对啊,就这么简单,但很多人早就把最根本的这个“1”给丢掉了。大家天天在焦虑要不要做货架电商、要不要搞直播、怎么用AI降本增效,想的全是这些营销和工具层面的“0”,反而没人老老实实琢磨怎么把一件衣服做好。运营手段和科技只是工具,你把前面的“1”做明白了,科技用上才有效果;否则,前面的“1”是无,后面加再多的“0”也依旧是零。

用不增长的定力,换穿越周期的底气

郑敏:从行业的角度来看,你觉得近两年国内男装市场的热点和新的增长点到底在哪里?时尚休闲男装该怎么去抓这个机会?

图片

吴磊:毫无疑问,近两年整个服装行业的风口和最大增长点就在户外风格上。

回顾国内男装的发展,每一次大周期的更迭都伴随着风口的轮转。2008年北京奥运会过后,国内运动服饰的热度开始下滑,时尚休闲男装迎来大爆发,也顺势让GXG实现了快速崛起。而到了近两年,全民盛行户外风,这成了整个行业唯一的流量红利和增长点。

但面对这个增长点,夹心层品牌最容易犯的错误就是“硬蹭”和“盲目跟风”。这股户外热潮未来到底能不能持续,其实谁也说不准;一旦热度回落,消费需求大概率还是会回流到时尚休闲赛道。

我个人认为如果要做户外,有个品牌叫爱棵米可以关注下,他们的路径很特别,切入逻辑和市面上的硬核户外完全不同:行业内绝大多数户外品牌长期都是以纯男性视角为主,由男性场景去带动女性消费;但其实绝大多数家庭根本不会参与高强度的硬核户外,他们要的只是极其轻松的近郊休闲、逛公园和露营场景。

所以他们从女性视角出发,用“速干面料”去解决普通家庭在近郊公园露营时,衣物受潮难干、体验感差的痛点,精准地抓住了这部分刚需。看清行业热点,然后用差异化的细分策略去切入,这才是抓增长点的正确姿势,而不是人家做什么你也跟着做什么。

郑敏:你曾在演讲里说“品牌要接受不增长”,为什么?

吴磊:纵观漫长的人类历史,增长从来都不是常态,下滑和负增长才是常态。这几十年来,中国企业一路过得太顺了,习惯了高增长。所以现在一旦不增长,大家就觉得奇怪,觉得管理者不行,换人、自我怀疑,全都困在死脑筋里。

这就是为什么,很多服装企业前期做得好好的,做到几十亿规模之后,还在盲目追求经营数字上的突破,错误的目标导致产品品质一路下滑,员工眼里也只有业绩,没有人愿意深耕产品,走到后面只会越来越难。所以我觉得,在当前这种不确定的环境下,活得够久比挣快钱重要得多。接受不增长,本身就是企业未来的底气,慢下来把步子踩实,你才能走得更远。

郑敏:在你眼里,国内现在这些规模做得很大的服装品牌,能称得上是真正的品牌吗?

吴磊:讲句大实话,中国其实没有几个真正的品牌,大家都只是在做生意而已。种草和种树的理论大家都听过,种植其实是最难的,一年只有一次机会,春夏秋冬四季轮转,季节过去了就得等一年。

很多真正穿越周期的品牌,都是历经了两三代人、甚至上百年的沉淀才成型。我们从改革开放到现在才40年,论品牌说实话为时过早。我经常说,可能我们想做的事情还得好几代人才能做成功。所以现在大家只是做了一个比较大的生意、拿到了一个比较好的标,距离真正的品牌还有很长的路。

郑敏:你觉得品牌还有新机会吗?

吴磊:我依然坚定地认为,当下和未来的几年,就是中国诞生世界级品牌最好的黄金窗口期。依赖低价,参数内卷的粗放经营模式一定会被淘汰,而新的品牌一定会崛起。

现在的00后、10后这一代人,物质条件极度富足,美育的种子从小就种下了,他们推开了审美这扇窗。现在有大批在国外进修过审美的年轻人回到国内,当这些审美在线、有内容表达的年轻操盘手,叠加我们国内顶尖、成熟的产业链基础时,一定会孵化出一批非常优秀的圈层化、小众化品牌。未来科技越发展,人群就会越细分,品牌不会越来越集中。慢下来,接受不增长,守住自己的那群底层受众,就能在未来的牌桌上活得很漂亮。

亿邦持续追踪报道该情报,如想了解更多与本文相关信息,请扫码关注作者微信。

文章来源:亿邦动力

广告
微信
朋友圈

这么好看,分享一下?

朋友圈 分享

APP内打开

+1
+1
微信好友 朋友圈 新浪微博 QQ空间
关闭
收藏成功
发送
/140 0