广告
加载中

柠季“吞下”哈根达斯 新茶饮进入冰淇淋大战

李瑟 2026-06-03 07:07
李瑟 2026/06/03 07:07

邦小白快读

EN
全文速览

这篇文章核心讲述新茶饮品牌柠季联合财团收购哈根达斯中国大陆门店业务,标志着新茶饮正式开启冰淇淋大战,核心干货信息整理如下:

1. 本次收购核心信息:从传出收购消息到协议落地仅用5天,收购方获得哈根达斯品牌在中国大陆经营门店和礼品业务的独家授权,通用磨坊保留哈根达斯在中国的零售及餐饮服务业务,交易预计2026年内完成,暂未披露交易金额。

2. 柠季发展背景:柠季2021年成立于长沙,先后获得字节跳动、腾讯、顺为数亿元投资,原计划2024年开店5000家,截至2026年5月实际门店为1799家,已经出海美国开店,定位为管理多品牌的全球化公司。

3. 行业现状:目前多个头部新茶饮品牌都已经布局冰淇淋业务,冰淇淋赛道毛利率高、易复制、客群大,竞争十分激烈,需要打造差异化卖点才能脱颖而出。

本次柠季收购哈根达斯的事件,给各类消费品牌带来了品牌建设、渠道拓展、赛道布局等多方面的参考干货,整理如下:

1. 品牌建设参考:国内新锐消费品牌普遍存在品牌力不足的问题,收购老牌外资在华品牌可以获得成熟的品牌背书,提升自身在商场端的议价能力,同时对吸引加盟商、获得资本认可都有正向作用。

2. 渠道拓展机会:当前国内核心商场的入口黄金点位基本被头部连锁品牌占据,新锐品牌很难拿到优质点位,收购拥有大量黄金点位资源的老牌品牌是快速获得优质渠道的有效路径。

3. 赛道布局提示:当前冰淇淋是新茶饮拓展的热门方向,赛道具备毛利率高、易复制、客群广的优势,但竞争激烈,老牌外资冰淇淋品牌原有模式已经不适配中国市场,必须做本土化改造才能实现盈利。

柠季收购哈根达斯进入冰淇淋赛道的事件,给茶饮、冰淇淋赛道的卖家释放了清晰的市场信号,干货整理如下:

1. 市场机会:冰淇淋赛道本身具备毛利率高、制作工艺简单易复制、成本损耗可控、目标客群大、支持高频消费的特点,是新茶饮延伸业务、打开增长空间的优质方向,目前已有霸王茶姬、喜茶、蜜雪冰城等多个头部品牌完成布局,赛道增长空间充足。

2. 经营要点提示:冰淇淋品类非常依赖强势能点位,优质核心点位是盈利的关键,不同市场可以采取不同策略,消费力不足区域可对标蜜雪冰城做大众市场,高端市场可依托点位做融合大店。

3. 风险提示:当前冰淇淋赛道竞争非常激烈,必须打造差异化的口味和概念才能存活,跨界布局需要解决品牌融合的问题,改造老牌品牌需要做好推倒重来本土化的准备,盈利不确定性较高。

新茶饮开启冰淇淋大战的产业动向,给冰淇淋相关生产工厂带来了很多商业机会和发展启示,干货整理如下:

1. 市场需求变化:随着大量新茶饮品牌入局冰淇淋赛道,市场对冰淇淋相关原材料的需求会明显增长,冰淇淋核心原材料为乳制品、以及巧克力、抹茶、坚果等辅料,相关原材料生产工厂可以针对性拓展新茶饮品牌客户,抓住增长机会。

2. 产品开发方向:当前冰淇淋赛道核心竞争力是差异化,品牌都需要打造差异化的口味和概念,工厂可以为下游品牌提供定制化研发生产服务,开发特色口味产品,匹配品牌打造差异化卖点的需求,提升自身竞争力。

3. 发展启示:当前中国本土品牌的供应链能力、产品研发能力已经超过外资在华团队,大量外资品牌正在逐步退出中国市场门店业务,本土工厂可以抓住本土新消费品牌崛起的机遇,加深和本土品牌的合作,实现自身业务增长。

柠季收购哈根达斯开启新茶饮冰淇淋大战,反映了当前餐饮赛道的新需求和新趋势,给相关服务商的业务拓展提供了很多参考,干货整理如下:

1. 行业发展趋势:新茶饮跨界布局冰淇淋已经成为明确的行业趋势,越来越多品牌会进入这个赛道,带动相关配套服务需求增长,包括品牌咨询、门店设计装修、产品研发、供应链服务、营销推广等领域都会诞生新的市场空间。

2. 客户核心痛点梳理:当前新茶饮品牌的核心痛点是难以拿到高端商场的黄金点位,缺乏高端品牌背书;老牌冰淇淋品牌的痛点是产品创新不足、模式老化,客流下滑严重;新锐品牌普遍缺品牌影响力,难以获得商场和加盟商信任。

3. 业务拓展方向:服务商可以针对性开发对应解决方案,比如推出老牌品牌本土化改造咨询服务、协助品牌对接商场点位资源、定制差异化产品研发服务等,匹配当前行业客户的核心需求,开拓新的业务增长点。

新茶饮入局冰淇淋赛道的行业变化,给线下商业平台商的招商、运营管理带来了很多启示,干货整理如下:

1. 当前品牌端的核心需求:本土新锐新茶饮品牌对高端商场核心黄金点位有强烈的需求,很多品牌会通过收购老牌冰淇淋品牌获取点位资源,融合型的茶饮+冰淇淋品牌也有进入核心商场布局的需求,平台可以抓住这个需求调整点位资源。

2. 平台运营调整方向:原有高端商场的黄金点位很多掌握在增长乏力的老牌外资冰淇淋品牌手中,平台可以借助品牌调整的契机,引入有活力的本土新茶饮+冰淇淋融合品牌,优化商场品牌组合,吸引更多年轻客流,提升商场整体营收。

3. 风险规避提示:当前冰淇淋赛道竞争十分激烈,品牌迭代速度快,平台招商时要重点考察品牌的差异化创新能力和本土化运营能力,优先选择有资本背书、运营能力强的品牌合作,规避品牌快速闭店带来的点位空置风险。

柠季收购哈根达斯中国门店业务,展现了中国新消费产业的多个新动向和新问题,对产业研究来说有很多值得挖掘的干货,整理如下:

1. 产业新动向:一是新茶饮行业的竞争已经从茶饮延伸到冰淇淋领域,多品牌布局、跨界拓展成为头部新茶饮的发展方向,新茶饮+冰淇淋成为新的商业模式;二是中国本土新锐品牌的实力已经大幅提升,资本和市场都认可本土品牌收购改造外资在华业务,外资品牌在华仅剩下品牌壳和点位资源价值,开始陆续套现退出。三是头部新茶饮已经开启全球化布局,多品牌全球化成为新的战略方向。

2. 值得研究的新问题:本土品牌收购外资老牌品牌后,如何完成品牌融合和本土化改造,新茶饮+冰淇淋融合模式的盈利性和可持续性,新茶饮全球化扩张的路径和挑战,都是产业发展中出现的新问题,具备较高的研究价值。

返回默认

声明:快读内容全程由AI生成,请注意甄别信息。如您发现问题,请发送邮件至 run@ebrun.com 。

我是 品牌商 卖家 工厂 服务商 平台商 研究者 帮我再读一遍。

Quick Summary

This article centers on the acquisition of Häagen-Dazs' mainland China store operations by a consortium led by Chinese new-style tea brand Ningji, a move that marks the official start of an "ice cream war" among new-style tea brands. Key takeaways are as follows:

1. Core details of the deal: It took only 5 days from the initial rumor to the signing of the agreement. The acquirer gained exclusive rights to operate Häagen-Dazs-branded stores and gifting business in mainland China, while General Mills retains Häagen-Dazs' retail and food service businesses in China. The transaction is expected to close by 2026, and the deal value has not been disclosed.

2. Background of Ningji: Founded in Changsha in 2021, Ningji has received hundreds of millions of yuan in funding from ByteDance, Tencent and Shunwei Capital. It originally planned to open 5,000 stores by 2024, but as of May 2026, it operates 1,799 stores. It has already expanded to the U.S. market and positions itself as a multi-brand global company.

3. Industry landscape: Multiple leading new-style tea brands have already entered the ice cream space. The ice cream track features high gross margins, easy replicability and a large customer base, making it extremely competitive. Brands need to build differentiated selling points to stand out.

Ningji's acquisition of Häagen-Dazs offers valuable insights for consumer brands across brand building, channel expansion and category expansion. Key takeaways are as follows:

1. Lessons for brand building: Most emerging Chinese consumer brands face weak brand equity. Acquiring established foreign brands operating in China can provide mature brand credibility, improve a brand's bargaining power with shopping mall operators, and have positive impacts on attracting franchisees and winning capital recognition.

2. Opportunities for channel expansion: Prime entrance locations in China's core shopping malls are almost entirely occupied by leading chain brands, making it extremely difficult for emerging brands to secure high-quality spots. Acquiring established brands that hold a large portfolio of prime locations is an effective way to gain access to high-quality channels quickly.

3. Implications for category expansion: Ice cream is a hot expansion direction for new-style tea brands, offering advantages including high gross margins, easy replicability and broad customer reach. However, the space is already highly competitive. The original business models of established foreign ice cream brands no longer fit the Chinese market, and localization is required to achieve profitability.

Ningji's entry into the ice cream track via the Häagen-Dazs acquisition sends clear market signals to sellers in the tea and ice cream sectors. Key takeaways are as follows:

1. Market opportunities: The ice cream track features high gross margins, simple and replicable production processes, controllable cost and waste, a large customer base and support for high-frequency consumption. It is an excellent direction for new-style tea brands to extend their business and unlock new growth. Multiple leading brands including Chagee, HEYTEA and Mixue Ice City have already entered the space, leaving plenty of room for further growth.

2. Operational guidance: The ice cream category heavily relies on high-traffic prime locations, which are the key to profitability. Brands can adopt different strategies for different markets: target the mass market in lower-spending regions following Mixue Ice City's model, or operate large combined-format stores in high-end markets leveraging prime location resources.

3. Risk warnings: Competition in the ice cream track is already very intense, so brands must develop differentiated flavors and concepts to survive. Cross-sector expansion requires solving brand integration challenges, and revamping established legacy brands requires a full reset and localization preparation, leaving high uncertainty around profitability.

The upcoming "ice cream war" among new-style tea brands brings new business opportunities and insights for ice cream-related manufacturers. Key takeaways are as follows:

1. Shifting market demand: As a large number of new-style tea brands enter the ice cream sector, demand for ice cream raw materials will see clear growth. Core raw materials for ice cream include dairy products, plus supplementary ingredients such as chocolate, matcha and nuts. Relevant raw material manufacturers can target new-style tea brand clients to capture this growth opportunity.

2. Product development direction: Differentiation is the core competitive advantage in the current ice cream track, as all brands are looking to build unique flavors and concepts. Manufacturers can offer customized R&D and production services for downstream brands, develop signature flavors to match brands' demand for differentiated selling points, and improve their own competitiveness.

3. Strategic insights: Chinese local brands now outperform foreign-invested teams in China in terms of supply chain and R&D capabilities. Many foreign brands are gradually exiting their store operations in the Chinese market. Local manufacturers can capitalize on the rise of Chinese new consumer brands, deepen cooperation with local brands, and drive their own business growth.

Ningji's acquisition of Häagen-Dazs and the resulting new-style tea ice cream war reflects new demand and trends in China's food service sector, offering valuable guidance for relevant service providers looking to expand their business. Key takeaways are as follows:

1. Industry development trends: Cross-sector expansion into ice cream has become a clear trend among new-style tea brands, and more brands will enter the space, driving growth in demand for related supporting services. New market opportunities will emerge in areas including brand consulting, store design and construction, product R&D, supply chain services and marketing.

2. Core pain points of clients: Leading new-style tea brands' biggest pain point is difficulty securing prime locations in high-end shopping malls and a lack of high-end brand credibility. Established legacy ice cream brands face challenges including insufficient product innovation, outdated business models and sharp declines in foot traffic. Most emerging brands lack brand influence, making it hard to win trust from shopping malls and franchisees.

3. Business expansion direction: Service providers can develop targeted solutions to match core client demand in the current market, such as localization consulting services for legacy foreign brands, assistance connecting brands with shopping mall location resources, and customized differentiated product R&D services, to unlock new growth points.

The entry of new-style tea brands into the ice cream space brings many insights for offline commercial platform operators in terms of leasing and operations management. Key takeaways are as follows:

1. Current core demand from brands: Emerging local new-style tea brands have strong demand for prime core locations in high-end shopping malls, and many will acquire legacy ice cream brands to gain access to these location resources. Combined-format tea-and-ice cream brands also have demand to enter core shopping malls. Platforms can adjust their location resource allocation to capture this demand.

2. Adjustments for platform operations: Many prime locations in high-end shopping malls are currently held by stagnant legacy foreign ice cream brands. Platforms can leverage this period of brand reshuffling to introduce dynamic local combined-format tea-and-ice cream brands, optimize the mall's brand mix, attract more young foot traffic, and boost the mall's overall revenue.

3. Risk mitigation guidance: The ice cream track is highly competitive and sees fast brand iteration. When leasing new spots, platforms should prioritize evaluating a brand's differentiated innovation capacity and localized operational capabilities, prioritize partnerships with brands backed by capital and with strong operational capabilities, to avoid the risk of location vacancy caused by rapid store closures.

Ningji's acquisition of Häagen-Dazs' mainland China store operations reveals multiple new trends and questions in China's new consumer industry, with significant insights for industrial research. Key takeaways are as follows:

1. New industry trends: First, competition in the new-style tea industry has expanded from tea to ice cream, and multi-brand, cross-sector expansion has become the development direction for leading new-style tea brands, with the "new-style tea + ice cream" model emerging as a new business form. Second, the strength of China's local emerging brands has improved significantly, and both capital and the market recognize local brands acquiring and revamping foreign-invested businesses in China. Foreign brands now only retain value in their brand equity and location resources in China, and have begun exiting via cash-out sales one after another. Third, leading new-style tea brands have already started global expansion, with multi-brand globalization emerging as a new strategic direction.

2. New research questions: Topics including how local brands can complete brand integration and localization after acquiring legacy foreign brands, the profitability and sustainability of the combined "new-style tea + ice cream" model, and the paths and challenges of new-style tea brands' global expansion are all new issues arising from industrial development with high research value.

Disclaimer: The "Quick Summary" content is entirely generated by AI. Please exercise discretion when interpreting the information. For issues or corrections, please email run@ebrun.com .

I am a Brand Seller Factory Service Provider Marketplace Seller Researcher Read it again.

从传言到“靴子落地”,仅用了5天时间。

5月28日,有媒体报道称新茶饮品牌柠季将收购哈根达斯中国业务。6月2日,哈根达斯母公司通用磨坊宣布已签署最终协议,将其在中国大陆的哈根达斯门店业务出售给一个投资者财团,其中包括新茶饮品牌柠季母公司。

根据协议,收购方将获得通用磨坊授予的独家授权,在中国大陆使用哈根达斯品牌经营冰淇淋门店及礼品业务。交易完成后,通用磨坊仍将继续拥有并运营哈根达斯在中国的零售及餐饮服务业务。不过双方并未披露交易金额,交易将于2026年内完成。

这意味着新茶饮代表柠季“吞下”老牌高端冰淇淋代表哈根达斯。

01 错过太平洋咖啡,拿下哈根达斯

在柠季创始合伙人汪洁的社交账号上,可以看到柠季最光鲜时刻,至少是汪洁本人觉得值得一提的成绩:截至目前,签约门店超3000家,获字节跳动、顺为、腾讯数亿元投资。

这家成立于2021年的新茶饮品牌,于2021年2月在长沙开出第一家门店,并在同年7月就拿到了字节跳动投资,之后2022年1月,其获得了第二轮包括腾讯的投资。

拿到融资后的柠季迅速扩张。2023年8月,其门店数量达到1700家。柠季创始人汪洁曾公开透露过开店目标:2023年底开店2000家,2024年的目标为5000家。

但是目标就是如此,是努力的方向,但是不一定会实现。根据窄门餐眼数据,2023年及2024年,柠季均开出了超过800家门店。2025年,柠季开店数量下降至534家。截至2026年5月13日,柠季在全国的门店为1799家,约等于柠季在2023年8月的门店数量。

尽管如此,柠季还是一家速度很快的公司。当然,“快”已经成为几乎所有头部茶饮公司的底色。汪洁在接受晚点LatePost采访时表示,经常晚上只睡4小时,有9个微信号,加了几万个生意伙伴和候选人,不放过任何一个合作的机会。

但是出海让汪洁“慢”了下来。2024年,汪洁决定将出海首站选在美国。一个鲜明的对比是,柠季在中国市场速度最快时一天能开6.6家店,但是在美国,首开店开业用了8个月的时间,汪洁形容这是“开荒”,但是这也让她学会了降低预期,尊重不同市场的游戏规则。

去美国“开荒”的汪洁将柠季定义为“管理多品牌的全球化公司”。

这个定义是汪洁2025年接受晚点LatePost采访时提出来的,但是2023年,柠季就着手全球化了。

2023年8月,柠季有意收购太平洋咖啡,不过之后不了了之。2024年,柠季决定出海美国。2025年5月,柠季美国首店开出。2026年6月,收购哈根达斯中国业务。柠季的全球化梦想迈出了更实质的一步。

联商高级顾问团成员王国平认为:国内新锐企业面临的困境是品牌力不够,需要外企品牌背书。包括在外企消费群体中的影响力、在商场端的议价力等。柠季‘吃掉’哈根达斯,可以共享部分哈根达斯影响力,不论柠季+哈根达斯融合店的影响力共振,还是哈根达斯未来对加盟商的影响,以及整体对资本的影响,都能够为柠季提供正向能量,柠季需要证明的是自己具备改造哈根达斯的能力,并快速实现盈利。”

02 柠季拿到商场“黄金点位”入场券?

为什么是哈根达斯?柠季并未给出确切答案。

但是“点位”或许是柠季看中的。王国平告诉联商网:“购物中心几个入口基本被星巴克、肯德基、麦当劳、霸王茶姬、茉莉奶白等霸占了,柠季几乎没有拿入口点位的入场券,叠加哈根达斯后有了可能。”

而高端商场黄金点位无疑是哈根达斯的优势。

1996年哈根达斯在上海开出第一家门店,正式进入中国内地市场,两年后,进入北京市场。当时,哈根达斯的一个冰淇淋球售价25元,另加小料的价格约为10元/种。

这个价格在现在看来或许不算贵,但是当时来看,是绝对“高端”的代表。当时上海平均房价每平方米不到3000元,上海普通职工月薪在800元左右,也就是普通职工日薪仅够购买一个冰淇淋球。

多米(化名)曾于2011年在哈根达斯杭州利星广场店(现为杭州湖滨88)做小时工,这是哈根达斯于2003年开出的门店,“当时打三小时工,才能买起一颗球”。当时多米每小时时薪为10元,而哈根达斯的一颗球价格为28元,“但是不得不说,外资品牌在品质和卫生方面非常规范。”

之后中国经济迅速起飞,从1999年到2017年,社会商品零售总额翻了11.8倍,其中餐饮收入总额则翻了12.4倍,增速比社会商品零售总额更快。哈根达斯凭借着经典广告语“爱她,就给她买哈根达斯”迅速在中国走红,门店也开进了高端商场黄金位置。

2017年,哈根达斯在中国的业绩达到顶峰,其销售额占哈根达斯全球业务的近50%。

不过近几年,随着野人先生、波比艾斯等品牌崛起,以及新茶饮布局冰淇淋业务,哈根达斯开始掉队。

在2025财年第二季度业绩会上,通用磨坊董事长兼CEO Jeff Harmening披露,哈根达斯在中国店铺客流量出现两位数下滑。

根据欧睿国际数据,2025年以餐饮交易额计算的中国冰淇凌有限服务餐厅品牌中,哈根达斯排在第三位,居于野人先生和DQ之后。

客流下滑带来的影响之一就是门店大量关闭。据窄门餐眼数据,2019年哈根达斯在中国拥有557家门店,而截至2026年5月,哈根达斯全国门店已缩减至262家,近乎腰斩。

面对逐年下滑的业绩,通用磨坊开始计划将哈根达斯中国业务摆上货架。2025年6月,据外媒报道,通用磨坊考虑以数亿美元出售其在中国的哈根达斯门店业务。现在通用磨坊找好了买家。

通用磨坊在公告中表示,此次业务调整完全符合通用磨坊的“加速发展”战略,旨在让公司能够更专注于那些能带来最强劲、最具盈利性增长机会的品牌与渠道。自2018财年以来,通用磨坊对旗下资产组合进行了大幅度的重组以谋求增长,通过一系列的收购与资产剥离,已经调整了近三分之一的净销售额基础。

在出售中国业务之前,2002年,通用磨坊将哈根达斯美国和加拿大业务出售给雀巢,保留了哈根达斯在北美以外的商标权和业务,2019年,雀巢又将其北美的哈根达斯业务出售给冰淇淋公司Froneri。

王国平认为:“柠季能够收购哈根达斯说明其存在强信用背书,有调动杠杆的能力。资本认可收购外企在华业务是因为中国企业的决策能力、供应链能力、产品研发能力等陆续超过外企在华团队,外企在华只剩壳资源价值,为了获取最大变现价值,外企开启及时套现的套路。有些没来得及套现的,直接退出中国市场,一分钱都捞不到的也有。”

03 哈根达斯中国会推倒重来吗?

对于柠季来说,新一轮竞争刚刚开始。

这并不局限于“茶饮”之争,而是茶饮品牌争相布局冰淇淋,于是形成了颇具特色的“新茶饮冰淇淋”大战。

联商网不完全统计发现,霸王茶姬、蜜雪冰城、CoCo都可、古茗、幸运咖、喜茶等茶饮品牌此前早已布局冰淇淋业务。以喜茶为例,喜茶专门打造了Lab2.0,并一口气上线了Tea Lab、Cake Lab、Bake Lab、Gelato Lab四大冰淇淋业务线。

而柠季是以“收购”开启了冰淇淋业务,这或许是一个喜忧参半的选择。喜的是哈根达斯在中国市场已经抢占了消费者心智,同时在高端商场拥有“一席之地”;忧的则是“融合”问题,柠季如何与哈根达斯更高效融合释放影响力,这是摆在柠季面前的一个重要难题。

“冰淇淋社交属性不能和茶饮抗衡,非常‘吃’强势能点位”,王国平告诉联商网:“柠季需要和其它已经做冰淇淋的茶饮一样,兼具‘强势能点位+大中型店’可以进行融合,消费力不足地区可以高仿蜜雪做大众市场。但是哈根达斯必须推到重来,已经不匹配中国市场了,需要本土化。”

商场负责人梁飞(化名)告诉联商网:“冰淇淋核心原材料就是乳制品、水和辅料(巧克力、抹茶、坚果等),而且制作工艺相对简单方便复制。毛利率高、容易复制、成本损耗可控、市场客群大、可以高频消费。”

或许正是因为可复制性强,冰淇淋赛道竞争尤为激烈残酷,“冰淇淋赛道要造差异化概念和差异化口味,寻找卖点,野人冰淇淋就抓住了这个卖点,”梁飞说道。

而这样的创新能力正是哈根达斯在中国市场缺失的,柠季的加入或许给哈根达斯带来了新可能。

随着柠季的加入,未来哈根达斯将做出哪些改变,双方会如何融合,联商网将持续关注。

注:文/李瑟,文章来源:新零售(公众号ID:ixinlingshou),本文为作者独立观点,不代表亿邦动力立场。

文章来源:新零售

广告
微信
朋友圈

这么好看,分享一下?

朋友圈 分享

APP内打开

+1
+1
微信好友 朋友圈 新浪微博 QQ空间
关闭
收藏成功
发送
/140 0