广告
加载中

东风猛士的“华为药方”:一场没有退路的自我革命与生死突围

魏帅 2026-05-26 11:43
魏帅 2026/05/26 11:43

邦小白快读

EN
全文速览

本文核心梳理了东风猛士品牌牵手华为后的发展历程、当前困局与突围计划,核心干货信息如下

1. 发展脉络:东风猛士是东风汽车冲击高端电动越野的品牌,2025年全年销量破万,同比增长387%,但2026年初销量遭遇断崖式下跌,1月销量环比暴跌66.4%,暴露出渠道全方面亏损、品控问题频发、内部管理混乱等多重问题。

2. 当前突围动作:东风猛士启动登峰行动,深度绑定华为,引入华为IPD等管理体系,全栈搭载华为智能驾驶、座舱技术,调整产品矩阵,布局越野生活生态,开设全新标杆旗舰店挽回信心。

3. 购车参考:目前猛士仍处于转型阵痛期,品牌口碑尚未稳定,意向用户可以观望转型成效后再做购车决策。

本文为传统车企冲击高端化、智能化转型提供了大量可参考的经验教训,核心内容如下

1. 品牌建设教训:新高端品牌不能过度依赖外部品牌光环,必须筑牢自身内生动力与用户口碑地基,东风猛士过度依靠华为金字招牌与军工基因背书,依然暴露出品牌根基薄弱的问题,难以获得稳定的市场认可。

2. 产品定价教训:高端定位需要匹配对等的品控与服务能力,盲目冲高定价再降价下探,会导致高端形象模糊,还会陷入红海竞争的被动局面,猛士从60-100万定价下探到30万区间,需要直面比亚迪方程豹、长城坦克的激烈围攻。

3. 可参考转型路径:可以尝试和科技公司开展HI PLUS联合共创模式,引入成熟管理体系重构内部流程,通过调整产品矩阵覆盖不同用户群体,布局场景生态提升用户粘性。

本文梳理了东风猛士的发展现状与行业风险,给汽车销售卖家提供了多维度参考,核心干货如下

1. 风险提示:代理新兴高端新能源品牌需要警惕压库策略带来的亏损风险,东风猛士目前无论是直营门店还是合作经销商几乎全面亏损,不少北京门店转租三分之二展厅面积分摊成本,高昂建店运营成本和低销量的矛盾十分突出。

2. 机会观察:当前豪华智能越野赛道仍有增长空间,消费者对低门槛智能化越野有明确需求,赛道尚未被头部玩家完全垄断,若东风猛士转型成功,渠道端仍能获得增长红利。

3. 合作参考:选择合作品牌时,要重点考察品牌方的管理稳定性与品控能力,品牌内部人事震荡、管理流程混乱会直接传导到终端,影响终端销售业绩,需要提前评估合作风险。

本文给传统车企工厂推进智能化转型提供了诸多启示,核心干货内容如下

1. 产品生产设计需求:高端越野用户愿意支付溢价的核心是可靠性,生产端必须把品控放在核心位置,东风猛士多次出现安全质量问题,包括高速辅助驾驶追尾后车门无法打开、B柱开裂等,严重透支品牌信任,说明品控是高端产品的核心生命线。

2. 商业合作机会:传统车企工厂想要补上智能化短板,可以尝试和科技公司开展深度共创合作,引入成熟的集成产品开发管理体系,既能获得全栈智能技术支持,也能提升自身研发管理效率。

3. 数字化转型启示:传统车企智能化转型不能只依靠外部技术输血,必须培育自身核心研发能力,避免过度依赖外部品牌导致丧失品牌独立性,同时要贴合市场需求调整产品布局,覆盖不同价格带的用户群体。

本文梳理了当前高端新能源汽车行业的发展痛点,给汽车行业服务商提供了明确的方向参考,核心干货如下

1. 行业发展趋势:传统硬派越野正在快速向豪华智能化方向转型,科技企业深度参与车企全流程开发已经成为新的行业趋势,介于智选车和HI模式之间的HI PLUS联合共创模式会成为更多传统车企转型的选择。

2. 客户核心痛点:新兴高端新能源品牌普遍存在研发流程不完善、内部管理混乱、渠道运营能力不足、品控体系不稳定的问题,很多品牌难以依靠自身能力解决这些问题,存在大量的服务需求。

3. 解决方案方向:服务商可以围绕车企转型需求,推出流程建设、品控体系搭建、供应商管理、渠道运营等针对性服务,也可以围绕车企布局越野生活生态的需求,提供场景运营、用户运营等配套服务,挖掘新的业务增长点。

本文暴露了新兴高端新能源汽车品牌发展中的诸多问题,给汽车平台商的招商、运营提供了参考,核心干货如下

1. 品牌端核心需求:处于转型期的新兴高端汽车品牌,需要平台提供场景化零售支持、用户运营支持,帮助品牌完成从0到1再到市场破圈的发展过程,灵活的运营配套政策更受品牌和经销商欢迎。

2. 招商风险提示:引入新品牌时,不能只看重短期预售数据和流量热度,要重点考察品牌的品控能力、管理稳定性和内生增长动力,警惕数据注水带来的流量泡沫,避免后续出现销量崩盘影响平台口碑。

3. 运营优化方向:可以针对转型品牌经销商普遍亏损的问题,推出灵活的场地共享、成本分摊等配套服务,帮助经销商降低运营压力,同时可以完善平台真实口碑展示机制,帮助消费者做出更理性的购车决策。

本文提供了传统车企高端智能化转型的典型鲜活案例,对产业研究有较高的样本价值,核心内容如下

1. 产业新动向:传统车企和科技公司的合作模式不断演化,已经衍生出介于智选车模式和HI模式之间的全新HI PLUS联合共创模式,科技企业输出全栈智能技术与管理体系,深度嵌入开发全流程,但不主导产品定义和整车设计,是值得研究的新商业模式。

2. 产业新问题:本文折射出中国汽车行业淘汰赛阶段的典型痛点,很多传统车企高端化转型过度依赖外部技术和品牌红利,忽视内生能力建设,最终出现数据注水、渠道崩塌、品控翻车的系统性问题,转型阵痛有普遍代表性。

3. 研究方向参考:可以进一步研究不同科技企业赋能传统车企模式的优劣,探讨传统车企如何平衡外部赋能与保持品牌独立性的关系,总结传统车企高端智能化转型的成功规律。

返回默认

声明:快读内容全程由AI生成,请注意甄别信息。如您发现问题,请发送邮件至 run@ebrun.com 。

我是 品牌商 卖家 工厂 服务商 平台商 研究者 帮我再读一遍。

Quick Summary

This article outlines the development trajectory, current challenges and turnaround plans of Dongfeng Mengshi following its partnership with Huawei, with key takeaways as follows:

1. Development history: Dongfeng Mengshi is Dongfeng Motor's premium electric off-road brand. It sold over 10,000 units in 2025, representing a 387% year-on-year increase. However, its sales plummeted in early 2026, with a 66.4% month-on-month drop in January, exposing multiple problems including widespread channel losses, frequent quality control issues, and chaotic internal management.

2. Current turnaround efforts: Dongfeng Mengshi has launched its "Climb to the Peak" initiative, deepening its partnership with Huawei by introducing Huawei's Integrated Product Development (IPD) management system, equipping all models with Huawei's full-stack intelligent driving and cabin technologies, adjusting its product portfolio, building an off-road lifestyle ecosystem, and opening new flagship flagship stores to rebuild consumer confidence.

3. Car-buying guidance: Mengshi is still in the painful transition period, and its brand reputation has not yet stabilized. Prospective buyers are advised to wait and see the results of its transformation before making a purchase decision.

This article offers a wealth of actionable lessons for traditional automakers pursuing premium and intelligent transformation, with key takeaways as follows:

1. Lessons for brand building: New premium brands cannot over-rely on external brand cachet; they must build their own internal momentum and solidify user reputation from the ground up. Dongfeng Mengshi has over-relied on Huawei's reputation and its own military gene for brand endorsement, yet still faces weak brand foundations that prevent it from gaining stable market recognition.

2. Lessons for product pricing: A premium positioning must be matched with equivalent quality control and service capabilities. Blindly setting high initial prices followed by cuts will blur the premium brand image and push the brand into a passive position in a crowded red ocean market. After dropping its price range from 600,000-1,000,000 yuan to the 300,000 yuan range, Mengshi now faces intense competition from BYD Fangchengbao and Great Wall Tank.

3. Reference transformation path: Traditional automakers can adopt the HI PLUS joint co-creation model with tech companies, introduce mature management systems to restructure internal processes, adjust product portfolios to cover different user groups, and build scenario-based ecosystems to boost user stickiness.

This article sorts out Dongfeng Mengshi's current development status and industry risks, providing multi-dimensional insights for auto sellers, with key takeaways as follows:

1. Risk warning: Agents of emerging premium new energy brands should be alert to inventory pressure-driven losses. Currently, nearly all of Dongfeng Mengshi's direct-operated stores and partner dealers are operating at a loss. Many stores in Beijing have sublet two-thirds of their showroom space to offset costs, highlighting the sharp contradiction between high store construction and operating costs and low sales volume.

2. Opportunity observation: The luxury intelligent off-road track still has room for growth, and consumers have clear demand for low-barrier intelligent off-road products. The segment has not yet been fully monopolized by leading players. If Dongfeng Mengshi successfully completes its transformation, channel partners will still be able to capture growth dividends.

3. Cooperation guidance: When selecting partner brands, sellers should prioritize evaluating the brand's management stability and quality control capabilities. Internal personnel turmoil and chaotic management processes will directly trickle down to terminal dealers and hurt sales performance, so cooperation risks should be assessed in advance.

This article provides multiple insights for traditional automaker factories advancing intelligent transformation, with key takeaways as follows:

1. Product development and production requirements: The core reason premium off-road users are willing to pay a price premium is product reliability. Production operations must prioritize quality control above all else. Dongfeng Mengshi has repeatedly experienced safety and quality issues, including rear doors failing to open after a ADAS-assisted collision on the highway and cracked B-pillars, which have severely eroded brand trust. This proves that quality control is the core lifeline of premium products.

2. Business cooperation opportunities: Traditional automaker factories looking to弥补 their intelligent technology gaps can pursue deep co-creation cooperation with tech companies and introduce mature integrated product development management systems. This model not only provides access to full-stack intelligent technology support, but also improves the factory's own R&D and management efficiency.

3. Insights for digital transformation: The intelligent transformation of traditional automakers cannot rely solely on external technology input. Companies must cultivate their own core R&D capabilities to avoid over-reliance on external partners that erodes brand independence, while adjusting product layouts aligned with market demand to cover user groups across different price points.

This article sorts out current pain points in the premium new energy vehicle industry, providing clear directional guidance for automotive industry service providers, with key takeaways as follows:

1. Industry development trend: Traditional hard-core off-road vehicles are rapidly transforming toward luxury intelligence, and deep involvement of tech companies in the full development process of automakers has become a new industry norm. The HI PLUS joint co-creation model, which sits between the Harmony Intelligent Mobility (HIM) model and the HI (Huawei Inside) model, will become the preferred transformation path for more traditional automakers.

2. Core client pain points: Most emerging premium new energy brands suffer from incomplete R&D processes, chaotic internal management, insufficient channel operation capabilities, and unstable quality control systems. Many brands cannot solve these problems on their own, creating large unmet demand for third-party services.

3. Solution direction: Service providers can develop targeted offerings around automakers' transformation needs, including process building, quality control system establishment, supplier management, and channel operation services. They can also develop supporting services such as scenario operation and user operation to match automakers' off-road ecosystem layout strategies, unlocking new business growth points.

This article exposes multiple pain points in the development of emerging premium new energy brands, providing reference for auto platform operators' recruitment and operation strategies, with key takeaways as follows:

1. Core brand-side demands: Emerging premium automotive brands in transition need platforms to provide scenario-based retail support and user operation support to help them complete their growth from zero to market breakthrough. Flexible supporting operation policies are particularly popular with brands and their dealers.

2. Investment and recruitment risk warning: When onboarding new brands, platforms should not only focus on short-term pre-order data and traffic popularity. They should prioritize evaluating a brand's quality control capabilities, management stability and internal growth momentum, guard against traffic bubbles caused by inflated data, and avoid subsequent sales collapses that damage the platform's own reputation.

3. Operation optimization direction: To address the widespread dealer losses faced by transforming brands, platforms can roll out supporting services such as flexible space sharing and cost sharing to help dealers reduce operational pressure. Platforms can also improve their authentic reputation display mechanisms to help consumers make more rational purchasing decisions.

This article presents a vivid, typical case study of the premium intelligent transformation of traditional automakers, with high sample value for industry research, with key content as follows:

1. New industry trends: Cooperation models between traditional automakers and tech companies are continuously evolving, giving rise to the new HI PLUS joint co-creation model that sits between the Harmony Intelligent Mobility (HIM) model and the Huawei Inside (HI) model. In this model, tech companies provide full-stack intelligent technology and management systems and embed themselves deeply into the entire development process, but do not lead product definition and complete vehicle design. This is a new business model worthy of further research.

2. New industry pain points: This article reflects typical pain points of the Chinese auto industry during its current elimination phase. Many traditional automakers pursuing premium transformation over-rely on external technology and brand dividends while neglecting the building of internal capabilities, eventually leading to systemic problems including inflated data, channel collapse, and quality control failures. The transformation pain experienced by Dongfeng Mengshi is broadly representative of the wider industry.

3. Recommended research directions: Future research can further compare the advantages and disadvantages of different tech company empowerment models for traditional automakers, explore how traditional automakers can balance external empowerment with maintaining brand independence, and summarize the success rules for the premium intelligent transformation of traditional automakers.

Disclaimer: The "Quick Summary" content is entirely generated by AI. Please exercise discretion when interpreting the information. For issues or corrections, please email run@ebrun.com .

I am a Brand Seller Factory Service Provider Marketplace Seller Researcher Read it again.

在不久前举办的北京车展上,一辆辆棱角分明、硬朗帅气的东风猛士越野车型在遍布华为IN CAR的华为系展馆中,都显得颇为亮眼。

区别于大众熟知的“四界两境”,东风猛士采用的是介于智选车模式与纯技术供应(HI模式)之间的全新联合共创模式(HI PLUS模式)。

华为开放全栈智能技术(如乾崑智驾、鸿蒙座舱),并派驻团队深度嵌入猛士的开发流程,甚至输出IPD(集成产品开发)管理体系,但华为不主导猛士的产品定义和整车设计

华为二字,也是东风猛士心中不二的“金字招牌”。

然而,主角光环无法常伴左右。短短数月,东风猛士经历了一场冰火两重天的剧烈震荡。

这个承载着东风汽车高端化野心的豪华电动越野品牌,在2025年的成绩单中,交出了年度销量破万辆的成绩,同比增长超300%。

在“销量破万”的狂欢与“华为加持”的光环之下,2026年伊始却遭遇断崖式下跌和舆论风波。

这不仅仅是一个汽车品牌的市场起伏,更是传统车企在智能化转型深水区艰难探索的缩影。

经销商巨额亏损、甚至拖欠媒体稿费的狼狈不堪,看似是个例,实则是长久以来体系问题的外显。

从销量数据的“虚假繁荣”到渠道体系的濒临崩塌,再到内部管理漏洞的集中爆发,猛士的困境揭示了中国汽车工业在淘汰赛阶段的残酷真相——依靠外部输血和短期策略堆砌起来的高楼,若没有坚实的内生动力与用户口碑作为地基,随时可能在市场的寒风中摇摇欲坠。

当“军工基因”撞上“华为智驾”,当激进的压库策略遭遇冰冷的市场寒冬,这个承载着东风集团高端化野心的品牌,正经历着成立以来最刺骨的阵痛。

透过这层繁华的表象,外界看到的不仅是一个品牌的销量危机,更是传统车企在智能化转型深水区,一场关于生存、信用与战略重构的残酷博弈。

01 销量“虚火”与渠道失血

东风猛士目前所经历的困局,源自一场由“数据注水”引发的信任危机。

自2022年成立以来,东风猛士在2024年才真正步入了高端越野的市场。

这一年,猛士推出了首款车型猛士917,正式进入豪华电动越野市场。但由于处于品牌初创和产能爬坡阶段,且定价直接位于60万-100万的高价值区间,让其这一年的整体销量基数较小,尚未形成大规模的市场声量。

在随后的2025年,猛士才迎来了销量爆发。2025年8月,与华为深度合作的主力车型猛士M817正式上市,猛士迅速打开了市场局面。据悉,猛士2025年全年累计销量达到10228辆,同比增长高达387%。

预售首小时破万的订单量,以及年底第10000辆整车下线的仪式,似乎都在宣告猛士已经成功跻身主流越野阵营。

然而,剥离掉这些宏大的叙事,真实的终端销售数据却显得苍白无力。

年终岁尾时刻,猛士的销量却似过山车般跌宕。2025年12月,官方公布的销量数据为3002辆,看似势头强劲;但仅仅一个月后,2026年1月的销量便直接腰斩至1008辆,环比暴跌66.4%。

而懂车帝数据显示,整个2026年一季度,M817累计销量仅为4077辆。年内销量的断崖式下跌,与预售时的火爆场面形成了极具讽刺意味的反差。

这种销量的剧烈波动,揭示了其增长内生动力严重不足的同时,也揭示了主机厂陷于“捷报”“破万”的困境。

一般而言,主机厂都将新车发布分为亮相与正式上市等环节,在新车亮相的同时,也为目标车主开启预售活动,通过一系列优惠政策吸引车主提前下定。这种促销手段一方面可以帮助企业排单生产、满足定制化的车辆需求,另一方面一张张销量破万、破十万的预售海报,也为企业提前开了“庆功酒”。

但据「创业最前线」观察,一般而言,车企预售大多分为小定和大定,简单理解小定即为支付小额定金,根据车企的协议可随时取消;大定则是在一定时间内“锁单”,锁单后便不可取消。

所以实际上,大定转化为锁单的订单,才能真正为车企贡献销量。

在业内人士看来,如猛士这般预售火爆销量“趴火”的情况,一定程度上也是消费者对于品牌产品品质的客观反馈。“发布会后的冷静思考,让消费者做出了更加理智的选择。”

当然,比销量下滑更触目惊心的,是猛士渠道体系的全面崩塌。财经杂志日前的调查显示,目前猛士的直营门店几乎全面处于亏损状态。

据一位接近猛士的渠道负责人直言,总部现在的目标早已不再是盈利,而是奢求“能少亏一点就行”。

「创业最前线」走访了一家位于天津市郊的猛士经销商门店时,也感受到了这家企业的割裂感。尽管只有两款在售车型,猛士依然采用的是传统的经销商模式。偌大的展厅内摆满新车,进店的顾客却没有几个,与对面小米汽车服务中心形成了鲜明的对比。

有报道称,在北京等地,部分猛士体验中心不得不将新车展厅三分之二的面积转租给其他品牌以分摊成本。高昂的建店成本、运营费用与销量不佳形成了尖锐矛盾。

从最初猛士917高达60万至100万的“自嗨式”豪华定价,到如今M817下探至30万区间试图走量,猛士在品牌高端化与市场生存之间显得左右为难。

事实上,30万至40万元区间本就是新能源市场竞争最惨烈的红海——前有比亚迪方程豹、长城坦克家族的集体围攻,后有传统合资品牌的降价清库存。

猛士试图通过“军工品质”和“华为牌”来掩盖自身品牌根基薄弱的困境,但这种策略,显然未能真正打动追求极致性价比的大众用户。而为了迎合“军工豪华”定位的核心客群,也让猛士在联名车型等营销中导致了高端形象的模糊,反而错失了机会。

02 质量“黑天鹅”与管理内伤

如果说销量的波动和渠道的亏损还能用“品牌初创期”来勉强粉饰,那么接踵而至的产品质量投诉和内部管理混乱,则直接将猛士的产品力与品牌信用推上了审判台。

在高端豪华越野赛道,用户愿意支付高昂溢价的核心逻辑在于“可靠性”与“尊贵感”,而猛士近期的一系列操作,恰恰是在透支这两样最宝贵的资产。

产品层面的“黑天鹅”事件频发,让猛士的“豪华”定位显得名不副实。尽管M817顶着“华系智能越野第一车”的光环,却在品控上接连翻车。尤其是在关乎生命安全的被动安全领域,猛士917曾发生过高速开启辅助驾驶未预警直接追尾大货车,且碰撞后车门无法打开、SOS未报警反而自动播放音乐的惊悚事故。

该事件在浙江卫视《1818黄金眼》等媒体的报道下,迅速成为了汽车行业消费维权的热点事件。

此外据大象新闻报道,还有消费者花费近80万元购买改装版猛士,结果发现行驶证品牌竟为“中悦牌”,且遭遇B柱开裂等严重故障。

这些“低配”体验与猛士标榜的“军工品质”、“豪华智能”形成了巨大落差,也消减着潜在消费者的购买信心。

比产品质量更让外界诟病的,是猛士内部管理暴露出的混乱。

2026年5月初,一场关于“拖欠稿费”的风波在车圈引爆。

猛士的原代理公司(迪思传媒)被曝拖欠多位汽车博主和媒体人数千元的车马费与稿费,甚至通过解散群聊等方式试图逃避。虽然事件在舆论发酵后,猛士高管迅速介入并结清了款项,但这起看似金额不大的纠纷,却像一面镜子,折射出猛士在营销费用拨付、供应商管理以及内部流程上的漏洞。

这种管理上的内伤,也体现在人事与战略的频繁震荡上。

2025年下半年,原猛士科技CEO曹东杰被调往东风本田,担任执行副总经理。他在猛士品牌从0到1的初创阶段发挥了关键作用,带领团队推出了首款车型猛士917。

原猛士科技副总经理万良渝则接任CEO一职。作为猛士初创团队成员之一,他拥有整车研发、供应链管理及生产运营的全链条经验。

在曹东杰时代,猛士的核心任务是完成品牌从0到1的搭建,而万良渝接棒后,猛士面临的首要任务变成了“冲销量”。

除了原有团队的人事换防外,猛士汽车还在这个关键节点引入华为系高管赵安担任现任MKT&销售服务部高级总监,这标志着猛士与华为的合作从单纯的技术供货升级为深度共创。

然而,原CEO曹东杰的卸任以及华为系人员的深度入驻,虽然体现了东风集团求变的决心,但也给企业的执行力带来了不确定性。

当企业内部还在为流程、预算和人事调整而焦头烂额时,自然没有更多的精力去打磨产品体验和构建完善的用户服务体系。

在竞争白热化的汽车市场,品牌信用的建立需要数年如一日的积累,但崩塌往往只需要几个负面新闻的叠加。

03 一场没有退路的突围战

面对销量失速、渠道崩盘与口碑下滑的三重困境,东风猛士显然已经意识到,修修补补已无济于事,唯有进行彻底的自我革命。

猛士的选择,是更加深度地拥抱华为。

2026年初,猛士开启“登峰行动”,不同于以往简单的零部件采购,猛士与华为的合作已经深入到了产品定义、研发流程乃至营销服务的全生命周期。

据悉,猛士全面引入了华为的IPD(集成产品开发)与IPMS(集成营销与服务)体系,试图从流程上保障既能“造好车”,更能“卖好车”。

在技术层面,猛士M817及后续车型全栈搭载了华为乾崑智驾ADS、鸿蒙座舱以及XMC数字底盘引擎。特别是行业首发的896线双光路激光雷达与50余颗高精度传感器,构建了号称“行业最全”的越野感知系统,旨在通过智能化手段降低越野的专业门槛。

除了技术上的“含华量”,猛士也在试图重构品牌生态,从单纯的卖车向卖生活方式转型。

未来五年,猛士计划投入120亿元研发资金,并构建“可玩可享”的越野生活圈,首批10个智能越野基地已投入试点,并计划在未来几年内扩展至100家。

同时,猛士与华为合作打造的全球首家标杆旗舰店已在武汉开业,试图通过全新的渠道形象挽回经销商与用户的信心。

在产品矩阵上,猛士也明确了分工:猛士917系列继续拉升品牌高度,M817系列作为主力走量,未来还将推出价格更亲民、尺寸更小的全新U系列产品,以覆盖更广泛的用户群体。这种“走下台阶”的策略,显示出猛士内部对于市场规模的渴望与务实。

产品、渠道端的变阵,都离不开华为二字。

此前,针对业界关注的“满血华为”问题,猛士汽车产品线高级总监王峰表示,猛士与华为的合作是持续、深度且广泛的。“更应该说有多少创新度的,就是含华的创新度上会有多少值得大家来期待。”

但不可否认的,有着极强品牌效果的华为虽然能带来短期的流量与技术红利,但也可能让猛士逐渐丧失品牌独立性与灵魂。

在30万至50万级的硬派越野市场,摆在猛士面前的是两大实力玩家。长城坦克拥有深厚的用户基盘与产品口碑,比亚迪方程豹则凭借性价比和品牌号召力,有着一众粉丝。

猛士想要在巨头的缝隙中撕开缺口,仅靠“华为加持”是远远不够的,还需要在底盘调校、越野可靠性以及售后服务上拿出真正的硬实力。

显然,这是一场并不确定的豪赌。

如果猛士能够利用好华为赋能的窗口期,迅速解决品控与渠道问题,将流量转化为真实的用户口碑,豪华智能越野品类或许会迎来新的畅销品。反之,如果继续沉迷于压库数据而忽视市场真实反馈,那么即便有华为的强力加持,猛士也可能在激烈的淘汰赛中黯然离场。

对于猛士而言,这确实是一场没有退路的突围战。

注:文/魏帅,文章来源:创业最前线(公众号ID:chuangyezuiqianxian),本文为作者独立观点,不代表亿邦动力立场。

文章来源:创业最前线

广告
微信
朋友圈

这么好看,分享一下?

朋友圈 分享

APP内打开

+1
+1
微信好友 朋友圈 新浪微博 QQ空间
关闭
收藏成功
发送
/140 0