广告
加载中

戴帽后股价遭遇10连跌停 安世半导体海外“失控” 闻泰科技进退两难

于莹 2026-05-20 14:57
于莹 2026/05/20 14:57

邦小白快读

EN
全文速览

本文梳理了原半导体白马股闻泰科技当前遭遇退市危机的来龙去脉,核心干货如下:

1. 事件核心情况:闻泰科技曾斥资300亿收购安世半导体,成为千亿市值A股半导体龙头,如今因为丧失安世半导体境外主体控制权,股权被强制托管,无法获取完整财务数据,被审计机构出具无法表示意见的财报和内控报告,股票被戴帽*ST闻泰,连续10个交易日跌停,市值5年蒸发超1400亿,若2026年仍无法解决问题将被强制退市。

2. 当前闻泰科技的困境:进无法收回安世境外控制权,解决不了审计问题,退市风险临近;退剥离安世境外会损失核心资产,安世中国切割存在巨大法律和业务风险,进退两难。

3. 当前自救动作:已经启动供应链重构,和本土晶圆厂合作,新设立全产业链半导体公司,将核心职能转移到国内,同时通过法律途径维权,得到中国商务部支持,但供应链重构周期长,和解难度大,最终结果仍不确定。

本次闻泰科技的危机事件,给开展海外并购、布局全球业务的品牌商提供了深刻的经验教训,核心干货如下:

1. 海外并购风险警示:蛇吞象式的海外大额并购,容易绑定地缘政治风险,哪怕完成交易成为行业标杆,也可能因为东道国干预出现核心资产控制权旁落的问题,最终给企业带来灭顶之灾,品牌商出海并购一定要提前做好地缘风险评估和防控预案。

2. 核心资产管控教训:核心海外资产一旦失控,会直接冲击企业财报和经营,本次事件中,安世半导体失控后,闻泰科技年营收从历史最高735.98亿元骤降至312.53亿元,归母净利润巨亏87.48亿元,直接触发退市条款,给所有品牌商敲响了警钟。

3. 应对参考方向:遇到危机后,品牌商可以通过加速供应链本土化转移、法律维权、争取母国官方支持来降低损失,为后续翻盘保留机会。

本次事件给布局海外市场、尤其是半导体领域的卖家梳理了海外投资的风险和可行应对路径,核心干货如下:

1. 明确风险提示:半导体领域属于地缘政治敏感领域,海外资产受政策干预风险极高,闻泰科技的案例显示,哪怕已经完成收购、成为行业龙头,依然可能因为东道国以国家安全为由强制托管股权,丧失核心资产控制权,最终引发退市风险,布局海外资产的卖家需要高度警惕这类非商业风险。

2. 风险的负面影响:本次事件中,闻泰科技股价10连跌停,市值蒸发超1400亿元,2026年一季度营收同比暴跌93.77%,充分展现了海外资产失控对企业经营的毁灭性打击,卖家做海外布局需要合理控制风险敞口。

3. 可参考的应对措施:如果遭遇类似风险,可以从两个方向开展自救,一方面加速供应链本土化重构,和本土供应商合作搭建自主产能,另一方面通过法律途径维权,争取母国官方支持,尽可能降低风险损失。

闻泰科技的危机事件给国内半导体相关生产制造工厂带来了明确的商业机会和发展启示,核心干货如下:

1. 带来了新的合作需求:闻泰科技在失去安世境外供给后,正在加速供应链本土化重构,已经加大了和中芯国际、华虹半导体等本土晶圆厂的合作力度,同时在自主研发替代产品,给国内晶圆厂、半导体器件制造工厂带来了大量新的订单需求。

2. 全产业链的商业机会:闻泰科技新成立了覆盖全产业链环节的闻世芯(上海)半导体公司,还把原本欧洲总部负责的工艺支撑、质量管控等核心职能迁移到国内,会带动国内半导体设备制造、电子材料、分立器件生产等全产业链环节的需求增长,相关工厂可以抓住本次国产替代的合作机遇。

3. 产业发展启示:依赖海外供应链的风险极高,国内半导体工厂要加速提升自主工艺能力,抓住当前地缘变化带来的国产替代风口,抢占原有海外供应链流出的市场份额。

闻泰科技退市危机事件,暴露了当前出海半导体企业的核心痛点,给相关产业服务商指明了新的发展方向,核心干货如下:

1. 明确行业发展趋势:当前地缘政治冲突加剧,半导体全球产业链正在加速分化重构,中国半导体企业出海风险上升,国产替代、供应链本土化已经成为明确的行业发展趋势,给服务商带来了新的市场空间。

2. 总结了客户的核心痛点:当前出海半导体企业普遍面临三类核心痛点,分别是海外资产控制权的风控问题、跨境财务审计的合规问题、供应链断供后的产能替代问题,这些都是服务商可以切入的赛道。

3. 给出了服务方向:闻泰科技当前正在搭建独立于安世体系外的本土半导体产业链,需要信息系统建设、供应链对接、车规芯片认证咨询、跨境法律服务等多方面的支持,服务商可以针对这些痛点开发专属解决方案,抓住本次国产替代浪潮的发展机会。

闻泰科技的退市风险事件,给证券交易平台以及半导体产业平台带来了多方面的运营启示,核心干货如下:

1. 风险规避方面:对于持有大额境外核心资产的上市企业,平台需要进一步完善跨境资产的信息披露要求,督促企业充分提示海外地缘风险,同时严格执行退市监管规则,及时提示投资者风险,保护中小投资者的合法权益。

2. 企业的核心需求:本次事件中,陷入危机的半导体企业需要平台在规则范围内给予合理的整改缓冲空间,同时需要平台对接本土产业资源,帮助企业对接本土供应商、资本,推进供应链重构,帮助企业度过危机。

3. 平台招商运营方向:半导体国产替代是当前明确的产业风口,平台可以重点引入本土半导体全产业链相关企业入驻,围绕国产替代打造产业服务集群,同时在招商阶段加强对出海企业海外资产风险的审核,提前规避系统性风险。

闻泰科技安世半导体控制权事件是中国半导体跨境并购领域的标志性事件,给产业研究带来了很多新的方向和启示,核心干货如下:

1. 梳理了产业新动向:当前地缘政治已经彻底改变了半导体产业全球化布局的逻辑,传统的中国企业大额海外并购整合模式已经遇到极大的政策性障碍,半导体产业正在走向区域分割,本土替代成为产业发展的核心方向,这是当前产业发展的新动向。

2. 提出了需要研究的新问题:该事件暴露出中国企业海外并购完成后,应对东道国地缘干预的控制权保护机制不足,企业自身的跨境资产风控体系不完善,国内层面的企业海外权益保护机制仍有完善空间等新的待研究问题。

3. 给出了研究方向启示:研究者可以围绕地缘冲突下中国企业海外资产保护路径、半导体产业链重构的可行模式、跨境并购风险防控体系建设等方向开展研究,也可以为政策层面完善中国企业海外权益保护、支持半导体国产替代提供研究参考。

返回默认

声明:快读内容全程由AI生成,请注意甄别信息。如您发现问题,请发送邮件至 run@ebrun.com 。

我是 品牌商 卖家 工厂 服务商 平台商 研究者 帮我再读一遍。

Quick Summary

This article breaks down how Wingtech Technology, once a blue-chip semiconductor stock in China, has fallen into its current delisting crisis. Key takeaways are as follows:

1. Core background: Wingtech acquired Nexperia for RMB 30 billion, emerging as a RMB 100 billion market cap A-share semiconductor leader. Today, after losing control of Nexperia's overseas entity and having its stake forcibly placed in escrow, Wingtech cannot access complete financial data. Its auditor has issued a disclaimer of opinion on both its financial statements and internal control report, resulting in the stock being labeled *ST Wingtech (a designation for firms with high delisting risk). The stock has dropped by the 10% daily limit for 10 consecutive trading sessions, and its market cap has shrunk by over RMB 140 billion in 5 years. If the issues remain unresolved by 2026, Wingtech will be forcibly delisted.

2. Current predicament: Wingtech is caught between two impossible options: it cannot regain control of overseas Nexperia to resolve the audit issue that puts it at imminent risk of delisting; but spinning off the overseas Nexperia business would force it to give up its core asset, while separating Nexperia's Chinese operations carries massive legal and business risks.

3. Ongoing rescue efforts: Wingtech has already launched a supply chain restructuring initiative, partnering with domestic Chinese fabs and establishing a new full-supply-chain semiconductor company to relocate core functions to mainland China. It is also pursuing legal remedies with support from China's Ministry of Commerce. However, supply chain restructuring is a lengthy process and a negotiated settlement remains highly elusive, leaving the final outcome uncertain.

Wingtech's crisis offers profound lessons for brand owners pursuing cross-border mergers and acquisitions (M&As) and global expansion. Key takeaways are as follows:

1. Overseas M&A risk warning: Large, "snake swallowing an elephant"-style overseas acquisitions are inherently exposed to geopolitical risk. Even after a deal closes and the company becomes an industry benchmark, host government intervention can still lead to the loss of control over core assets, threatening the entire business. Brand owners pursuing overseas M&As must conduct comprehensive geopolitical risk assessments and prepare contingency plans in advance.

2. Lesson on core asset control: Losing control of key overseas assets directly undermines corporate financial performance and operations. In Wingtech's case, after losing control of Nexperia, its annual revenue plummeted from a peak of RMB 73.598 billion to RMB 31.253 billion, with a net loss attributable to shareholders of RMB 8.748 billion, directly triggering delisting clauses – a stark warning for all brand owners.

3. Recommended response framework: When facing similar crises, brands can mitigate losses and preserve turnaround opportunities by accelerating the localization of supply chains, pursuing legal action, and securing official support from their home government.

This case outlines cross-border investment risks and viable response strategies for sellers operating in overseas markets, especially in the semiconductor sector. Key takeaways are as follows:

1. Clear risk alert: Semiconductors are a geopolitically sensitive sector, and overseas assets face extremely high risks of policy intervention. The Wingtech case shows that even after an acquisition is completed and a company becomes an industry leader, host governments can still forcibly take over stakes on national security grounds, stripping the company of control over core assets and triggering delisting risk. Sellers with overseas assets must be highly alert to these non-commercial risks.

2. Negative impacts of unmanaged risk: In this case, Wingtech's stock dropped by the daily limit for 10 consecutive trading sessions, its market cap evaporated by more than RMB 140 billion, and its Q1 2026 revenue plummeted 93.77% year-over-year, demonstrating the devastating impact of losing control of overseas assets on business operations. Sellers must reasonably limit their risk exposure when expanding overseas.

3. Actionable response options: Companies facing similar risks can pursue self-rescue through two key channels: first, accelerate the localization and restructuring of their supply chains, partnering with domestic suppliers to build independent production capacity; second, pursue legal remedies and secure official support from the home government to minimize losses.

Wingtech's delisting crisis presents clear commercial opportunities and development insights for domestic Chinese semiconductor manufacturing facilities. Key takeaways are as follows:

1. New partnership demand: After losing access to Nexperia's overseas supply, Wingtech is accelerating the localization of its supply chain, ramping up cooperation with domestic fabs including SMIC and Hua Hong Semiconductor, and developing indigenous alternative products. This brings substantial new order demand to domestic Chinese fabs and semiconductor component manufacturers.

2. Full-supply-chain commercial opportunities: Wingtech has established a new full-supply-chain firm, Wenshixin (Shanghai) Semiconductor, and relocated core functions previously based at its European headquarters – including process support and quality control – to mainland China. This will drive demand growth across the entire domestic semiconductor ecosystem, including semiconductor equipment manufacturing, electronic materials, and discrete device production. Relevant manufacturers can capitalize on this domestic substitution opportunity to secure new partnerships.

3. Industry development insight: Overreliance on overseas supply chains carries extremely high risk. Domestic Chinese semiconductor factories should accelerate the improvement of their independent process capabilities, leverage the domestic substitution trend created by shifting geopolitics, and capture market share exiting from traditional overseas supply chains.

Wingtech's delisting crisis has exposed core pain points for Chinese semiconductor companies expanding overseas, and points to new growth directions for relevant industry service providers. Key takeaways are as follows:

1. Clear industry trend: Amid escalating geopolitical conflict, the global semiconductor supply chain is rapidly fragmenting and restructuring. Risks for Chinese semiconductor firms operating overseas are rising, and domestic substitution and supply chain localization are now clear, irreversible industry trends, opening up significant new market opportunities for service providers.

2. Core customer pain points identified: Chinese semiconductor companies operating overseas generally face three core pain points: risk control for overseas asset control, cross-border financial audit compliance, and capacity substitution after supply chain disruptions. All three are promising segments for service providers to enter.

3. Recommended service focus: Wingtech is currently building an independent domestic semiconductor supply chain separate from the Nexperia system, requiring support in information system construction, supply chain matching, automotive chip certification consulting, cross-border legal services and more. Service providers can develop customized solutions targeting these pain points to capitalize on the growth opportunity of the current domestic substitution wave.

Wingtech's impending delisting risk offers multiple operational insights for securities exchanges and semiconductor industry platforms. Key takeaways are as follows:

1. Risk mitigation: For listed companies holding large volumes of core overseas assets, platforms should strengthen information disclosure requirements for cross-border assets, mandate that companies fully disclose geopolitical risks, strictly enforce delisting regulations, and issue timely risk warnings to investors to protect the legitimate rights and interests of retail investors.

2. Core enterprise needs: In this case, the crisis-hit semiconductor company needs a reasonable compliance buffer for restructuring within the scope of existing rules, as well as platform support to connect with domestic industrial and capital resources to advance supply chain restructuring and tide over the crisis.

3. Platform recruitment and operational direction: Semiconductor domestic substitution is an established industry growth trend. Platforms can prioritize onboarding domestic companies across the full semiconductor supply chain, build industrial service clusters focused on domestic substitution, and strengthen risk screening for overseas assets of expansion-focused companies during the recruitment process to pre-empt systemic risk.

The battle for control of Nexperia at Wingtech is a landmark event in cross-border M&As for Chinese semiconductors, opening up new research directions and insights for industry analysts. Key takeaways are as follows:

1. New industry trends mapped: Geopolitics has fundamentally rewritten the logic of global layout in the semiconductor industry. The traditional model of large-scale cross-border M&As by Chinese companies now faces enormous policy barriers, the industry is moving toward regional segmentation, and domestic substitution has become the core development direction – this is the key new trend in current industry development.

2. New research questions identified: The event exposes that Chinese companies lack sufficient control protection mechanisms to address host government geopolitical intervention after closing overseas M&As, that corporate cross-border asset risk control frameworks remain underdeveloped, and that China's national-level mechanism for protecting overseas corporate interests still needs improvement – all of which are new topics requiring further research.

3. Guidance for future research: Researchers can focus on topics including protection pathways for Chinese overseas assets amid geopolitical conflict, viable models for semiconductor supply chain restructuring, and the construction of cross-border M&A risk control systems. Research in these areas can also inform policy improvements for protecting Chinese corporate overseas interests and supporting semiconductor domestic substitution.

Disclaimer: The "Quick Summary" content is entirely generated by AI. Please exercise discretion when interpreting the information. For issues or corrections, please email run@ebrun.com .

I am a Brand Seller Factory Service Provider Marketplace Seller Researcher Read it again.

5月6日,停牌后的闻泰科技正式复牌,但股票简称已变更为“*ST闻泰”。

复牌首日,公司股价开盘即跌停,并由此进入了连续下跌的通道。自5月6日至19日,公司股价已经连续10个交易日下跌,从停牌前的28.12元/股一路跌至16.84元/股。

曾经,闻泰科技斥资超300亿元的天价完成了对安世半导体的收购,创下中国半导体行业当时最大的海外并购纪录。这笔里程碑式的交易,让闻泰科技一跃成为全球领先的功率半导体厂商,也奠定了其在国内半导体行业的标杆地位。

2021年,闻泰科技的市值曾一度突破1600亿元,是A股市场公认的“半导体白马”,也是众多机构投资者的重仓标的。

可惜,辉煌的时光如此短暂,曾经为其带来无限荣光的安世半导体,如今却成为了公司最大的“包袱”,并将其拖入了进退两难的境地。

于5月19日,公司总市值约为210亿元,仅5年时间,这家曾经的千亿巨头市值蒸发超过1400亿元,无数投资者损失惨重。

如今的闻泰科技正站在悬崖边上,面临着前所未有的“退市”危机。接下来,闻泰科技又能否扭转乾坤,避免退市的命运?

01 “半导体白马”,站在退市边缘

4月29日晚间,闻泰科技发布公告称,因2025年度财务报告与内控报告均被容诚会计师事务所出具无法表示意见,公司股票将叠加退市风险警示与其他风险警示,5月6日起简称变更为“*ST闻泰”。

这也意味着,若2026年度公司仍无法消除上述审计非标情形,其将面对被终止上市的风险。也正因如此,自公告发布以来,闻泰科技股价已连续多个交易日一字跌停。

那么,曾经的行业标杆为何会走到被出具“无法表示意见”审计报告的地步?

这一切的导火索,还要追溯到安世半导体控制权上。2025年10月,闻泰科技对核心资产安世半导体境外主体的控制权受到实质性限制,相关股权被强制托管。

安世半导体的中国业务与荷兰业务自此割裂,双方不仅无法进行正常的业务往来,甚至无法互访对方的IT系统,这直接导致闻泰科技无法获取安世境外主体的完整财务数据,也无法完成合并报表的编制工作。

而对于审计机构而言,由于无法获取安世境外主体的原始财务资料和审计底稿,无法对相关财务信息的真实性、准确性和完整性发表任何审计意见,最终只能出具无法表示意见的审计报告。

同时,由于公司内部控制在境外子公司管控方面存在重大且广泛的缺陷,内控报告也同步被出具了无法表示意见,双重非标直接触发了严厉的退市警示条款。

正是由于丧失了对安世半导体境外主体的控制权,闻泰科技在2025年财报中做出了一系列重大会计处理调整:对安世控股的股权投资拆分为安世境内和安世境外两部分,自2025年10月1日起,仅并表安世境内。

而无法被并表的安世境外,则按控制权受限时点估计的公允价值重分类为其他权益工具投资,该公允价值与原账面价值之间的差额确认为投资损失89.48亿元。

这一巨额投资损失直接击穿了公司的业绩底线。数据显示,2024年,闻泰科技实现了735.98亿元的营收,创下公司历史最高纪录。到了2025年,公司营收骤降至312.53亿元,同比暴跌57.5%;归母净利润更是巨亏87.48亿元,亏损幅度较上年大幅扩大。

进入2026年,公司经营形势进一步恶化,一季度仅实现营收8.16亿元,同比骤降93.77%;归母净利润亏损1.89亿元,由盈转亏,单季度营收规模已不足巅峰时期的零头。

02 退市风险下,将面临艰难抉择

对于闻泰科技而言,目前最棘手、最紧迫的问题,无疑是尽快消除退市危机。

根据《上海证券交易所股票上市规则》,如果上市公司连续两个会计年度的财务会计报告被出具无法表示意见或者否定意见的审计报告,且未在第三年改善,将被强制退市。

这意味着,如果到2026年年报披露时,公司仍然无法获取安世境外的完整财务资料,进而消除审计机构的疑虑,取得标准无保留意见的审计财报,无疑将进一步加剧闻泰科技退市的风险。

面对这种情况,闻泰科技其实也是左右为难。

截至2025年12月31日,闻泰科技已经对安世境外确认了89.48亿元的投资损失,目前账面价值为241.20亿元。

单纯从财务角度来说,公司既然已经将对安世境外投资的部分损失计提完毕,如果此时将安世境外股权彻底剥离,即使按照账面价值出售,也不会再对公司的利润表产生大额的一次性冲击。

不仅如此,剥离后闻泰科技将不再需要合并安世境外的财务报表,审计非标问题将迎刃而解。

但从另一个角度来看,切割也非一蹴而就,除了要损失核心资产、动摇行业地位外,安世中国的切割问题更为复杂。

从股权来讲,安世中国是安世半导体的全资子公司,而不是闻泰科技的直接子公司。在闻泰科技拥有安世半导体100%股权的情况下,自然可以通过安世半导体间接控制安世中国。

但现在,闻泰科技已经失去了对安世半导体境外主体的控制权,安世中国的股权归属已经处于模糊状态。

目前闻泰科技之所以还能实际控制安世中国,主要是依靠中国的司法管辖权和安世中国的本土管理团队,但如果闻泰科技为了解决审计问题,强行将安世中国从安世半导体体系中剥离出来,直接划归自己名下,是否会引发更多争端,进而带来一系列负面连锁反应不得而知。

在安世中国目前的客户中,有相当一部分是国际汽车厂商,能够和这些大客户保持合作,对安世中国,闻泰科技的业务稳定至关重要。对于闻泰科技而言,安世中国是其目前还能掌控的优质半导体资产,也是未来翻盘的一大希望。

今年2月,闻泰科技官微发文称,将继续通过一切合法途径,坚定不移地争取彻底恢复对安世半导体的全部合法控制权与治理权。

只是,在财报被非标之后,闻泰科技是否会为了尽快解决审计问题、避免退市而考虑放弃对安世半导体的绝对控制权,「子弹财经」也试图向闻泰科技方面进行了解,但截至发稿尚未得到回复。

这也造成了闻泰科技当前面临的困境:进,无法收回安世境外的控制权,也无法解决审计问题,退市风险日益临近;退,剥离安世境外,将损失惨重,且安世中国的切割存在巨大的法律和业务风险。

不过,4月30日在接受机构调研时,闻泰科技明确表示,公司正在逐步推动相关事项的解决,并透露新信息系统已开始运行,内部控制逐步恢复,争取在2026年度审计中取得标准无保留意见的财务报告与内控报告,实现撤销退市风险警示及其他风险警示。

只不过,留给闻泰科技的时间不多了。

03 积极自救,但“远水难解近渴”

这场危机并非突如其来的“黑天鹅”,当闻泰科技以“蛇吞象”的魄力吞下安世半导体,所有人都在为中国半导体产业的历史性突破欢呼,却很少有人意识到,这场交易从一开始就被绑在了大国博弈之上。

如今,面对安世半导体控制权旁落、公司财报审计非标引发的退市危机,闻泰科技并未坐以待毙。

自2025年10月失去安世境外控制权以来,闻泰科技就已经启动了供应链的紧急重构工作。一方面,加大了与中芯国际、华虹半导体等本土晶圆厂的合作力度,加速产品的工艺验证和产能导入;另一方面,也在积极研发替代产品,试图用自主设计芯片填补安世境外产品断供留下的空白。

今年4月,闻泰科技在上海全资设立了“闻世芯(上海)半导体有限责任公司”,经营范围不仅覆盖半导体器件专用设备制造,还包括集成电路芯片及产品制造、电子专用材料制造、半导体分立器件制造等全产业链环节。

不仅如此,公司还将原本由欧洲总部负责的工艺支撑、设备维护、质量管控等职能逐步迁移至国内,在安世境外晶圆直供完全中断、只能依靠消化库存维持交付的当下,闻泰科技正在加速将半导体业务的核心能力向中国本土转移。

种种操作意味着,闻泰科技已经开始着手布局独立于安世体系之外的半导体设备制造能力。

不过,供应链的重构绝非一朝一夕之功。一般来说,车规级芯片的认证周期通常长达2-3年,一款新产品从设计流片到通过AEC-Q100认证、最终进入整车厂供应链,需要经过极其严苛的测试和验证。一旦库存耗尽而本土替代未能跟上,对闻泰科技来说,无异于致命一击。

在供应链“自救”的同时,闻泰科技也在法律层面与荷兰政府和安世外籍管理层展开了激烈的博弈。

目前,管理层采取了“边谈边打”的策略,一方面仍在通过各种渠道寻求与荷兰政府等有关方面展开沟通,希望能够部分恢复对安世半导体的控制权。另一方面,根据官微信息,公司明确表示将继续通过一切法律途径,坚决捍卫自身权益。

只是,荷兰政府此次干预安世半导体的运营,是以“国家安全”和“保护本国产业利益”为由,在当前地缘政治紧张的背景下,闻泰科技能否拿到有利的法律裁决仍未可知。

而和解之路同样充满坎坷。荷兰政府的核心诉求是将安世半导体留在欧洲,避免其核心技术和产能被转移至中国;而闻泰科技的底线则是至少能够恢复对安世半导体的财务控制权,解决审计非标问题。双方的诉求仍存在冲突,短期内难以达成一致。

值得注意的是,中国商务部在2025年11月至12月期间多次就闻泰科技事件做出了明确回应,表示将依法依规维护中国企业的海外合法权益。而闻泰科技能否顺利脱困,「子弹财经」也将持续关注。

注:文/于莹,文章来源:子弹财经,本文为作者独立观点,不代表亿邦动力立场。

文章来源:子弹财经

广告
微信
朋友圈

这么好看,分享一下?

朋友圈 分享

APP内打开

+1
+1
微信好友 朋友圈 新浪微博 QQ空间
关闭
收藏成功
发送
/140 0