广告
加载中

佣金齐涨?利润腰斩?东南亚“后红利时代” 一批跨境卖家狼狈撤离......

王昱 2026-05-14 16:53
王昱 2026/05/14 16:53

邦小白快读

EN
全文速览

当前东南亚跨境电商已经告别早年遍地红利的时代,正式进入高成本、高内卷的后红利时代,大量中小卖家狼狈撤离,想了解这个市场的普通读者可以参考以下核心干货:

1. 行业现状:目前东南亚三大主流平台Shopee、Lazada、TikTok Shop都在持续涨佣加费,卖家需要承担十多种费用,综合抽成比例最低18.5%,最高可达50%;早年卖家利润率能达到25%-35%,现在自然流量下净利润只有5%-10%,运营得当的也仅能维持10%-15%,超过半数中小卖家不赚钱甚至亏本,被迫退出市场。

2. 卖家出路参考:部分卖家尝试转移到俄罗斯、拉美等新兴市场,但俄罗斯佣金更高,拉美本土店门槛高、物流周转慢,都不容易做;跨平台运营也各有痛点,目前留守卖家的常见玩法有关闭非必要付费项目控成本、转做本土店拿流量、截流做私域独立站规避抽成。

东南亚电商进入后红利时代的格局变化,给出海东南亚的品牌商带来了新的挑战与机会,核心干货整理如下:

1. 渠道与定价层面:目前三大主流平台集体持续涨佣加费,卖家端综合抽成最高可达50%,渠道成本大幅上涨,品牌商需要重新核算全链路利润,调整定价策略;当前市场高度价格内卷,卖家涨价会直接流失流量,还面临跟卖抢单的问题,品牌商需要帮助下游商家控制成本,维持价格竞争力。

2. 渠道布局参考:行业已经形成成熟的多平台布局思路,即Shopee做规模、TikTok Shop做美妆时尚等内容驱动类目的爆品、Lazada守住利润,品牌商可以参考这个逻辑布局多渠道,降低单一平台成本上涨的风险。

3. 新机会:当前越来越多卖家开始脱离平台布局私域独立站,品牌商可以提前布局自有私域阵地,沉淀用户数据,降低对平台的依赖,提升长期盈利能力。

针对想布局或已经在做东南亚跨境的卖家,当前市场的风险、机会和可参考玩法整理如下:

1. 核心风险提示:东南亚电商已经正式进入后红利时代,三大平台近两年来多次上调佣金、新增各类杂费,卖家综合抽成普遍能达到30%-50%,早年25%-35%的利润率已经成为过去,仅靠自然流量净利只有5%-10%,大量中小卖家已经因利润击穿红线被迫出局,新手入场需要格外谨慎。

2. 转场其他市场的情况:俄罗斯市场佣金比东南亚更高,最高能达到50%;拉美市场费率虽然偏低,但本土店需要配齐本土公司、税号等资质,开店成本高,物流周转周期长达40-70天,资金周转压力很大。

3. 可行玩法参考:可以做全平台多渠道布局分散风险;也可以关闭非必要付费项目,靠选品精度和小额投流控制成本;也可以尝试截流做私域独立站规避抽成,但需要注意合规封店的风险。

东南亚电商后红利时代的行业变化,对出海工厂的生产布局和数字化转型有这些启示:

1. 生产设计需求:当前东南亚市场价格内卷十分严重,消费者对价格敏感度极高,卖家稍微涨价就会流失流量,还会被跟卖抢走订单,因此工厂需要在控制生产成本的同时优化产品设计,适配市场的高性价比需求,帮助下游卖家维持利润空间。

2. 新商业机会:越来越多卖家为了规避高佣金,开始布局独立站私域,对差异化、高复购、有品牌属性的产品需求明显上升,工厂可以对接这类新兴卖家,开发适配私域运营的产品,开辟新的订单增长渠道。

3. 自有品牌出海启示:工厂做自有品牌出海要避免单一平台依赖,参考行业思路分散布局多渠道,不同平台承担不同功能;同时要完善数字化库存管理能力,应对TikTok内容电商流量脉冲式波动带来的库存风险。

东南亚电商后红利时代的行业变化,给服务商带来了新的市场需求和发展机会,核心信息整理如下:

1. 行业发展趋势:平台集体持续涨佣推高了卖家的经营成本,大量中小卖家利润严重缩水,卖家降低平台依赖、规避高佣金的需求十分强烈,已经催生了脱离平台的私域独立站新生态,赛道红利逐渐显现。

2. 客户核心痛点:当前卖家的痛点主要集中在三个方面:一是平台高抽成压缩利润空间,生存难;二是跨平台运营缺乏对应的能力和工具,运营难;三是布局本土店缺少合规资质、配套渠道,开店难。

3. 可布局的解决方案:可以针对中小卖家推出低成本独立站建站服务,配套包裹引流、私域运营的全套解决方案;针对跨平台运营的卖家推出多平台管理工具、代运营服务;针对布局本土店的卖家推出合规账户、税务、提现等配套服务,精准匹配市场需求。

东南亚电商后红利时代,商家端的诉求和当前平台模式存在的问题,对平台运营调整的参考信息整理如下:

1. 当前核心问题:三大平台集体多次涨佣加费,新增十多种杂费,导致商家综合经营成本大幅上涨,大量中小卖家利润腰斩被迫退出市场,部分商家甚至开始铤而走险截流做私域脱离平台,长期来看会动摇平台生态根基。

2. 商家核心需求:中小商家需要更透明、更稳定的费率结构,降低刚性经营成本;同时需要平台管控跟卖乱象,遏制恶性价格内卷,维护公平的经营环境。

3. 运营调整方向:平台需要平衡自身收益和商家的生存空间,避免过度涨佣导致商家批量流失;可以优化费率结构,取消不必要的杂费,给合规经营的卖家相应的费率优惠;同时加强平台治理,管控跟卖行为,稳定市场价格秩序,降低商家内卷程度,维护平台生态的长期稳定。

当前东南亚电商进入后红利时代,出现了很多值得研究的产业新动向与新问题,核心信息整理如下:

1. 产业整体新动向:东南亚电商已经完成了从补贴红利期到成熟期的转型,平台的发展逻辑从补贴拉增长转向收割商家利润,行业进入优胜劣汰的洗牌阶段,曾经作为生力军的无货源中小卖家已经成为存量包袱,大量出局。

2. 新衍生的商业模式:平台集体涨佣激化了平台与商家的利益矛盾,催生了新的灰色生态,大量卖家开始从平台截流,搭建私域+独立站的成交闭环,一个服务于卖家规避高佣金的独立站产业链正在形成,未来有可能催生一波新的独立站创业潮。

3. 值得研究的新问题:当前行业价格内卷失控,商家违规逃佣、不合规租用本土店的现象大幅增加,行业整体合规风险上升;商家转移新兴市场也面临开店门槛高、物流成本高、资金压力大等新问题,都值得深入研究。

返回默认

声明:快读内容全程由AI生成,请注意甄别信息。如您发现问题,请发送邮件至 run@ebrun.com 。

我是 品牌商 卖家 工厂 服务商 平台商 研究者 帮我再读一遍。

Quick Summary

Southeast Asia’s cross-border e-commerce has left behind the era of widespread early-stage growth dividends, and has officially entered the "post-dividend era" defined by high operating costs and fierce market competition. A large number of small and medium-sized sellers (SMBs) have been forced to exit the market. For general readers looking to understand the market, here are the key takeaways:

1. Current industry landscape: The three major platforms dominating the region – Shopee, Lazada, and TikTok Shop – have continuously raised commission and fee rates. Sellers now face more than a dozen different charges, with total platform cuts ranging from a minimum of 18.5% to as high as 50% of revenue. Where early entrants once enjoyed profit margins of 25% to 35%, net profit margins from organic traffic now only hover between 5% and 10%. Even well-operated businesses only maintain margins of 10% to 15%. More than half of SMBs are unprofitable or losing money, and have been forced to exit the market.

2. Paths forward for sellers: Some sellers have attempted to relocate to emerging markets such as Russia and Latin America. However, Russia carries even higher commission rates, while Latin America has high barriers to entry for local stores and slow logistics turnaround, making neither market an easy alternative. Cross-platform operation also comes with its own unique pain points. Common strategies for sellers that remain in Southeast Asia include cutting non-essential paid advertising to control costs, shifting to local store accounts to access preferential platform traffic, and diverting customers to private-domain independent websites to avoid platform commission fees.

The structural shift of Southeast Asia’s e-commerce market into the post-dividend era has created both new challenges and new opportunities for brands going overseas into the region. Key insights are summarized below:

1. Channel and pricing strategy: The three major regional platforms have all continuously raised commissions and fees, pushing total platform cuts as high as 50% and driving substantial increases in channel costs. Brands need to recalculate full-funnel profit margins and adjust their pricing strategies. The market is also gripped by intense price competition: raising prices directly leads to traffic loss, and brands also face threats from unauthorized resellers stealing orders. Brands therefore need to support downstream sellers with cost controls to maintain price competitiveness.

2. Multi-channel layout strategy: A mature multi-channel layout logic has already formed in the industry: brands use Shopee to scale volume, TikTok Shop to launch viral hits in content-driven categories like beauty and fashion, and Lazada to protect profit margins. Brands can follow this framework to build a multi-channel footprint and reduce risk from cost increases on any single platform.

3. New growth opportunities: A growing number of sellers are moving off-platform to build private-domain independent websites. Brands can build their own private-domain assets early to accumulate first-party user data, reduce reliance on platforms, and improve long-term profitability.

For sellers looking to enter or already operating in Southeast Asia’s cross-border e-commerce market, here is a summary of current market risks, opportunities, and actionable strategies:

1. Core risk warning: Southeast Asia e-commerce has officially entered the post-dividend era. Over the past two years, the three major platforms have repeatedly raised commission rates and added new miscellaneous fees, pushing total platform cuts to 30%-50% for most sellers. The 25%-35% profit margins of the early years are a thing of the past; sellers relying solely on organic traffic only see net margins of 5%-10%. A large share of SMBs have already been forced out after their profits fell below break-even, and new entrants should proceed with extreme caution.

2. Outlook for relocating to other markets: Commission rates in Russia are even higher than in Southeast Asia, reaching up to 50%. While fee rates in Latin America are relatively lower, opening a local store requires local business registration, tax IDs and other qualifications, leading to high entry costs. Logistics turnaround also takes 40 to 70 days, creating heavy cash flow pressure.

3. Actionable strategies for current market: Sellers can spread risk through a full multi-channel layout across platforms. They can also cut non-essential paid programs and control costs through rigorous product selection and small-scale targeted advertising. Alternatively, they can divert platform traffic to private-domain independent websites to avoid commission fees, though they must remain mindful of the risk of account suspension for violating platform policies.

Industry changes in Southeast Asia’s post-dividend e-commerce era hold the following implications for manufacturing supply chains going overseas, for production planning and digital transformation:

1. Product design and production requirements: Price competition is extremely fierce in the current market, and consumers are highly price-sensitive. Small price increases lead directly to traffic loss and lost orders to unauthorized competitors. Factories therefore need to optimize product design while controlling production costs, to meet the market’s demand for high value at low price points and preserve profit margins for downstream sellers.

2. New business opportunities: To avoid high platform commissions, a growing number of sellers are building private-domain independent websites, which has driven a sharp increase in demand for differentiated, high-repeat-purchase, branded products. Factories can partner with these emerging sellers, develop products adapted for private-domain operation, and open up new channels for order growth.

3. Implications for private label overseas expansion: Factories launching their own branded products overseas should avoid over-reliance on a single platform, and follow the industry’s established playbook for diversified multi-channel layout, with each platform fulfilling a different functional role. They also need to build out robust digital inventory management capabilities to mitigate inventory risk from the impulsive, flash-demand traffic patterns of TikTok’s content commerce model.

Industry changes in Southeast Asia’s post-dividend e-commerce era have created new market demand and growth opportunities for service providers. Key insights are summarized below:

1. Industry development trend: Broad-based commission hikes across platforms have driven up sellers’ operating costs, severely eroding profits for large numbers of SMBs. Sellers have strong demand to reduce platform reliance and avoid high commissions, which has spawned a new off-platform ecosystem built around private-domain independent websites. A new growth dividend is emerging in this track.

2. Core pain points of clients: Sellers currently face three core pain points. First, high platform cuts compress profit margins and threaten business survival. Second, sellers lack the capabilities and tools required for efficient cross-platform operation. Third, sellers lack access to compliant qualifications and supporting channels to open local stores.

3. Actionable solution opportunities: Service providers can launch low-cost independent website building services for SMBs, paired with end-to-end solutions for traffic diversion from platforms and private-domain operation. For cross-platform sellers, they can offer multi-platform management tools and third-party operational services. For sellers building local store footprints, they can offer supporting services including compliant accounts, tax services and withdrawal solutions to precisely match market demand.

In the post-dividend era of Southeast Asia e-commerce, merchant demands and the flaws of the current platform model offer the following insights for platform operators adjusting their strategies:

1. Core current issues: Repeated commission and fee hikes across the three major platforms, with more than a dozen new miscellaneous fees added, have driven a sharp increase in merchants’ total operating costs. Large numbers of SMBs have seen their profits halved and been forced to exit the market, and some merchants have even chosen to divert traffic off-platform to private domains to avoid fees. In the long term, this trend undermines the foundation of the platform ecosystem.

2. Core demands of merchants: SMBs need more transparent, stable fee structures to reduce fixed operating costs. They also need platforms to crack down on unauthorized arbitrage selling and curb cutthroat price competition to maintain a fair operating environment.

3. Direction for operational adjustment: Platforms need to balance their own revenue growth with the survival space of merchants, avoiding excessive commission hikes that trigger mass merchant exits. They can optimize fee structures, eliminate unnecessary miscellaneous charges, and offer preferential rates to compliant merchants. At the same time, they should strengthen platform governance, crack down on unauthorized reselling, stabilize market price order, reduce competitive pressure on merchants, and maintain the long-term stability of the platform ecosystem.

Southeast Asia’s e-commerce industry has entered the post-dividend era, giving rise to many new industry trends and research-worthy problems. Core information is summarized below:

1. New overall industry trends: Southeast Asia e-commerce has completed its transition from a subsidy-driven growth phase to a mature phase. Platforms’ growth logic has shifted from subsidizing user acquisition to extracting profits from merchants, and the industry has entered a consolidation phase of natural selection. The large cohort of unstructured dropshipping SMBs that once drove growth have now become excess inventory in the market, and large numbers are exiting.

2. New emergent business models: Broad-based commission hikes have intensified conflicts of interest between platforms and merchants, giving rise to a new gray ecosystem. Large numbers of sellers are diverting traffic from platforms to build closed-loop sales funnels combining private domains and independent websites. A full independent site industry that serves sellers looking to avoid high commissions is taking shape, and it may spawn a new wave of independent site entrepreneurship going forward.

3. Research-worthy new problems: Uncontrolled price competition has led to a sharp increase in rule-breaking behavior, including fee evasion and the unauthorized use of local store accounts, driving up overall industry compliance risk. In addition, sellers relocating to emerging markets face new structural barriers including high entry requirements, high logistics costs, and heavy cash flow pressure – all areas that merit in-depth research.

Disclaimer: The "Quick Summary" content is entirely generated by AI. Please exercise discretion when interpreting the information. For issues or corrections, please email run@ebrun.com .

I am a Brand Seller Factory Service Provider Marketplace Seller Researcher Read it again.

东南亚市场的气候正在快速转变。

文丨王昱

编辑丨何洋

【亿邦原创】深圳一座略显陈旧的写字楼里,自2020年开始做Shopee、Lazada的跨境卖家老周感慨道:“很多出海东南亚的同行都撤啦。”

他们隔壁就有一个Shopee卖家,年后走了。“据说业绩从去年年初开始就不太行了,到今年1月,涨佣金、还有开征技术支持费等成本又上涨,让老板决定彻底关张大吉了。”老周谈道。

对于很多友商的消失,他给出了双向解读:有的人通过“赛博下南洋”真正发迹了——从夫妻店干成几十号人的团队、多平台布局,出去另寻宝地;但绝大多数,是不赚钱甚至亏本,心力交瘁、熬不住便索性转行了。

如今,像老周一样仍坚守阵地的卖家们,正站在东南亚电商市场优胜劣汰的十字路口——向前一步,是冲破天花板后的广阔天地;退后一步,则是人去楼空的冰冷现实。

造成这一局面的,既有逐渐饱和的市场供给、高度内卷的价格博弈,也有平台侧逐年攀升的抽成比例,以及由此所引发的刚性成本上涨。

从几年前遍地补贴、随处拾金的新手乐园,到如今平台停止输血、甚至“连呼吸都要付费”的“中小卖家绞肉机”,东南亚市场的气候正在快速转变——家们的“后红利时代”拉开帷幕。

步入成熟期

各大平台达成涨佣加费的共识?

“一年两大涨、每季度一小涨、每个月还有额外微调。”卖家Jenny对于东南亚各主流电商平台过去一两年来的费率调整颇有微词。

除了零敲碎打的品类佣金上浮,还有各类杂费的逐层累加。从仓储费、交易手续费、平台服务费、代扣税费等常见类型,到免退服务费、分期付款费、直播计划服务费、直播标签费等细分项目,在商家的后台,十余种“常设费种”构成了现如今复杂的成本拼图。

马来西亚跨境店卖家林晋梳理2026年开年以来的费用变动轨迹发现,五个月内,Shopee有三次费用调整对自己的业务产生了直接影响:先是年初加征了8%的“技术支持费”;紧接着,5月,加入现金返还计划的卖家,大促日前加收2%活动服务费的计费时段从28小时拉长至48小时;还有预订订单也多了2%的费用。

不只Shopee一个平台。据不完全统计,从2025年初至今,Shopee和Lazada分别发布了二十几则和十几则涉及费用调整或增加新费种的公告。TikTok Shop自2021年上线至今,整体佣金率也上升了超10个百分点——在特定局部市场或许更多,同时,卖家所须缴纳的费用类型,也从最早只有交易手续费、类目佣金,变成现在还有各种“杂费”,如SFP(Shipping Fee Program,超级运费券活动)服务费、基础设施费等。

一位泰国站卖家指出,TikTok Shop收费项目设置上与Shopee类似。“比如,Shopee有技术支持费,TikTok有平台支持费。”他揶揄道,“前后脚,你涨我也涨。”

那么,现如今的东南亚电商市场,卖家所承担的实际抽成比例究竟有多高呢?

在Shopee,若将基础商品佣金和各类常设杂费一并纳入计算,在不包含运费、广告投流费及临时性活动费用的前提下,卖家所须缴纳的最低综合抽成比例为18.5%(中国台湾站跨境直发模式),最高则为39.14%(马来西亚站跨境直发/三方仓模式)。

(来源:Shopee卖家学习中心)

TikTok Shop的费用结构较为复杂,在不同国家有着截然不同的费用架构。

以泰国为例,其常规抽成包括如下四项:佣金(6.42-9.63%)、交易手续费(3.21%)、基础设施费(1.07泰铢)、电商增长服务费(6.96-8.03%,上限199泰铢),如再加上超级运费券活动(即SFP)、各类大促增值服务包,卖家所需负担的抽成比例普遍在25%以上。

Lazada则推行“一站式费用结构”,在部分站点,把多个付费项目打包整合到了“佣金”费用中,卖家的整体费率大多维持在15%-30%之间。

图:Lazada东南亚站点费率列表

(来源:Lazada卖家中心)

(来源:Lazada卖家中心)

一位对东南亚三大平台都曾有所涉猎的卖家指出:“如果(商品)链接都认真参与活动、仔细运营,该投流就投、该发券就发,那么抽成比例冲三望五——起底30%直至最高50%——并非罕见情况。”

“很多人算不清账,看着订单量上涨,以为赚钱了,最后一算才发现亏了。”Jenny说,“利润薄,就必须更谨慎。”

另一位从2017年就开始做东南亚电商的卖家Ann则表示,过去8年里,自己的盈利能力已经腰斩。

“刚开始那会儿,利润率做到25%-35%,上架就开单,不投广告也有比较可观的动销。”她回忆道。那个时代,东南亚市场还是一块有待开垦的处女地,抽成低、流量足,卖家与平台之间尚存某种平衡。

而今,这种平衡正面临冲击。

“现在真实净利润能稳在10%-15%,已经算选品精准、运营得当、外加运气不错的战绩了。”Ann直言,“如果只靠自然流量,净利便只有5%-10%。

一位运营人员向亿邦动力提供了一组更极端的数字:整个2月份,其管理的店铺营业额10000多,纯利润却不到100块钱,毛利率不足0.4%;其中有几天,毛利甚至不到0.15%。

他算了一笔账:各色抽成先拿走40%左右;进货价、合规、打包、头程、投流、测评、达人——这些加起来又砍掉近50%。真正留给利润的空间,从一开始就只有个位数,一旦供货商涨价,利润红线就会被击穿。

逃出东南亚“围城”后

天空真的更广阔吗?

“全球还有哪个平台,平台费用低于15%的吗?”一位东南亚卖家在群里发问。

消息发出去后,群里沉默了好一阵——不是没人看见,而是没有人能给出一个让人安心的答案。事实上,很多主攻东南亚市场的卖家,都曾尝试逃离“围城”,到更广阔的全球市场区寻求增量,俄罗斯、拉美等新兴市场都是热门目的地。

但现实颇为骨感——在东南亚难以觅得的,在其他地方似乎也不容易争取。

“做了俄罗斯才知道,东南亚的佣金都算收敛克制的了。”一位此前做印尼市场的卖家尝试经营某俄区平台的本土店后,大为咋舌。

“佣金是按照产品售价分段设置的——售价越高比例越大。”他解释道,“超过300卢布(合人民币27.3元)的商品,不管什么品类,纯佣金平均35%以上,如果没用官方仓、走本地自发货,纯佣金有时直接拉到50%。”

拉美似乎友好一些。Shopee的拉美站点,抽成结构与比例相较于其东南亚站点更为简洁:整体至多三项常规费种,总抽点普遍在22%以下。

图片

图:Shopee拉美站点费率列表(来源:Shopee卖家学习中心)

美客多与之类似。以跨境自发货模式为例,除履约仓储费、投流费用之外,刚性的平台抽成只有两项:按类目与国家而定的佣金(以“售价+运费”为基数,普遍在12%至20%之间),以及支付手续费(4.5%至5.5%),整体比例在20%上下。

然而,费率低不等于机会均等。“本土店是更诱人的富矿。”正在纠结是否开设美客多本土店的前东南亚卖家Joe认为,相较于跨境店,本土店在展示权重、活动位置、站外广告投放等方面拥有显著优势。

但想要开设本土店,门槛并不低:必须备齐“本土公司+本地税号+本地银行账户+本地法人”四件套,这直接把大量中小卖家拦在门外。

“个人店账号市价三千元左右,实缴税费比例更高;企业店账号市价超过四万,税负更低一些——想搭建店群,成本过于高昂,还要随时承担触发合规风控的问题。”Joe说。

更现实的难题是物流。“做东南亚,船运备货最快两周就能入仓搞定。”他无奈道,“拉美呢?几十万货款至少要在海上漂40-70天,周转压力不可小觑。”

如果说,转移阵地、逃离东南亚的打法并不容易,那么在Shopee、TikTok Shop、Lazada“御三家”之间东食西宿,能否撬动更多增量?

“全渠道运营是一条必经之路。”一位前Shopee小电器大卖直言。在平台费用一年内可能上涨5到10个百分点的现实下,依赖单一平台显然会把路越走越窄。“2026年,经济状况最健康的卖家,是那些在Shopee上做规模、在TikTok Shop上做靠内容驱动发现的类目——比如美妆、时尚、生活方式——然后靠Lazada或自营DTC渠道来守住利润。”

然而,并非所有人都能在跨平台经营中游刃有余。原Shopee卖家Cathy表示,尝试过几家平台之后,发现各有各的难处。

“Lazada的综合费率、客单利润以及转化率表现还不错,但是单量有限。”她谈道,同一SKU,Lazada的流量往往只有Shopee的35%-50%,而且推广费用也更贵——CPC大概是后者的1.7-3倍。“Shopee体量优势很大。”

而TikTok Shop的情况更为复杂,对于新手,它有可能是个爆款和滞销并存的“赌桌”。

“对运营能力是个考验。”Cathy坦言。从她的实操来看,TikTok Shop是打造爆款机会最多的平台——流量确实凶猛。但利润受到达人佣金和投流成本的直接影响,一旦ROI控制失当,现金流就会迅速烧穿。

“而且动辄暴跌暴涨(内容电商脉冲式爆发的特性),对于我们这些习惯了Shopee备货节奏的卖家,也需要一个适应期。库存问题一直没找到太好的解法,还得靠更多数据积累。”她说。

谁已彻底出局?

谁在“险中求富贵”?

有人还在迷雾中探索出路,也有人已经卷起铺盖、准备撤离。

“我直接把店退了!”一位小卖家去年年末,彻底与东南亚市场“割袍断席”。当被问及为何不通过涨价来对冲成本上涨时,他苦笑一声:“现在就是比谁亏得少。价格一拉高,流量立马往下掉——是个死结。”

在平台费用上涨与卖家提价这场不对称的博弈中,卖家始终投鼠忌器。“他涨,我也得跟着调,但不管怎么调,我都是少赚;不是他涨10%我也涨10%,而是我只能涨5%——再多,销量就全被跟卖的抢光了。”

他懊恼地表示:“现在(卖家们)应该团结起来控价,但现实里,照样有人贴着成本上链接——这样卷下去是好不了的。”

归根结底,曾经浩浩荡荡、奔赴东南亚淘金的无货源中小卖家队伍,完成扩充市场供给的历史使命后,已从生力军转为存量包袱。

除了转身离开,也有不少卖家选择无为而治,彻底放弃了精细化管理、随缘出单。

“穷有穷打法、富有富打法。”老周表示,“就拿TiKTok Shop举例,报了活动,抽水肯定高啊,我现在把除了基础广告以外所有的选项都关闭了——什么联盟伙伴、优惠券、大促活动、现金返现都不要了,一切从简,靠小额投流和选品精度来博取利润。”

还有人选择将经营重心从跨境店转向深耕本土店,谋求流量加成。但也有卖家认为,“本土店的红利期也快到头了”。

Ann解释道,如今本土店的抽成同样水涨船高。对于没有当地合伙人的卖家而言,只能选择“租店”。而这门生意已经被服务商做得花样百出:店租、押金是一笔;物流和提现转账必须走他们绑定的渠道,又是一笔。“还没出单,沉没成本就已经不小了。”

在巨大的盈利压力下,还有不少“邪修”卖家开始以身试法、险中求富贵。

“租了本土店,但是从未报过税。”一位卖家爆料,“风险归风险,机会归机会,两笔账分开算。”

但这终究是一桩行走在悬崖边的生意,一旦触发平台的合规审查或税务追溯,多年的积累可能一夜归零。更微妙的是,店铺和收款账户都在名义上的持有人名下,租店者等于把自己的身家性命绑在了一个陌生人的信用上。

还有卖家自己“建坝”——把平台上的客流截下来、蓄成自己的私域池。

“与其在平台上降价割肉,不如靠包裹里放卡片,搭配站外专属的折扣码,直接把熟客洗到极简独立站去。”一些卖家群里,这样的声音并不鲜见。

再辅以WhatsApp或Instagram做售后闭环,“不用被抽成,利润自己吃完,不好吗”?在他们看来,这本就是一笔理直气壮的账——客户是自己花投流费买来的,留下来自己用,算不得什么离经叛道的想法。

图片

某卖家在社媒上爆料的图片

有人说得更直白:“我宁愿给顾客让利20%,给更优先的售后、设更长的无理由退货期——真金白银,宁与顾客,也不给平台。”

私下交易免去了平台抽成,成本基数一降,折扣空间反而更大,熟客留住了,还能沉淀一手用户数据——对于这笔“不义之财”,卖家似乎算得比平台更精细。

至于“抓住就封店”的风险,不少商家早已不以为意。“都是做店群起家的,封店还见得少吗?”一句话点破了平台威慑力的边界。在他们眼中,不赚钱,就没人会理会平台治理;况且如今的抽成比例,在他们眼里,已经是“逼人落草为寇”。

风向既起,嗅觉灵敏的人已经开始在产业链上布局。

一些服务商悄然入场,在东南亚卖家群里推销起建站服务,打出的旗号直戳痛点——“规避平台高佣金”。一个从包裹引流、私域沉淀到独立站成交的生态闭环,正在阴影之下悄然滋长。

“小卖家需要生存,平台也需要生存;违规有违规的理由,涨佣有涨佣的逻辑。”一位卖家这样总结当下的情况。在他看来,两种情绪碰撞在一起,所催生出的化学反应,可能是一波谁也不曾料到的独立站创业潮。

这或许是理解当下东南亚电商市场最微妙的注脚。步入“后红利时代”,在平台竞合格局渐趋稳定、GMV连年增长的水面之下,还涌动着复杂的暗流。

亿邦持续追踪报道该情报,如想了解更多与本文相关信息,请扫码关注作者微信。

文章来源:亿邦动力

广告
微信
朋友圈

这么好看,分享一下?

朋友圈 分享

APP内打开

+1
+1
微信好友 朋友圈 新浪微博 QQ空间
关闭
收藏成功
发送
/140 0