广告
加载中

九芝堂泰康茶被曝虚假宣传、生产方没资质,老字号“授权掘金”是种好模式吗?

亿邦动力 2026-01-23 17:01
亿邦动力 2026/01/23 17:01

邦小白快读

EN
全文速览

九芝堂泰康茶因虚假宣传和生产资质问题被曝光,消费者需警惕产品宣传和来源。

1. 虚假宣传细节:产品在短剧和电商平台推广时声称“养肝护肝”,但国家备案仅限“调节细胞免疫”和“对化学性肝损伤有一定保护作用”,肝病医生指出后者是实验性结论,非日常理解的功能。

2. 生产方风险:委托生产单位西安今正枫岗保健品公司有失信记录且参保人数为零,提示选择产品应核实生产商背景。

3. 实操要点:九芝堂回应将加强审核和培训,消费者应依赖官方备案信息,避免轻信主播夸大宣传,重点关注产品真实功效。

品牌授权模式在商业化中易引发虚假宣传和质量风险,需强化管控以保护品牌信誉。

1. 品牌营销挑战:九芝堂子公司的泰康茶事件损害品牌形象,此前还有产品营养成分不符标签的记录,显示授权管理漏洞。

2. 消费趋势观察:用户行为更注重真实性,虚假宣称“养肝护肝”暴露消费端需求与产品不符,品牌渠道建设应透明化。

3. 价格竞争与研发启示:九芝堂战略转向“中药+干细胞+大健康”,但短期利润下滑,授权模式如同仁堂案例也出现造假事件,提示加强产品开发和广告审核,防止价格战牺牲质量。

4. 应对措施:九芝堂计划加强日常监管和广告抽检,品牌商可借鉴以构建可信任的授权生态。

供应链风险和政策合规是当前焦点,事件提示卖家把握机会并规避负面影响。

1. 政策解读与风险:生产方资质失信和参保为零,导致产品问题,市场监管总局通告案例提示需遵守官方标准,避免法律纠纷。

2. 增长机会:九芝堂作为老字号收入超2万亿元,但近年下滑,行业因集采和需求调整分化,卖家可关注合规产品如大健康领域新布局。

3. 事件应对措施:九芝堂子公司总经销有历史不合格记录,卖家应学习其加强资质审核和抽检的做法,利用合作方式提升供应链韧性。

4. 风险提示:虚假宣传易引发消费争议,电商平台推广需谨慎,正面机会在于构建可信赖渠道,扶持政策如培训可缓解风险。

生产资质问题和电商合作带来教训与机遇,工厂需推进合规化。

1. 生产需求警示:西安今正枫岗保健品公司作为委托生产方无资质且失信,暴露生产风险,工厂应确保自身资质完整,避免类似处罚。

2. 商业机会:九芝堂业务扩展到干细胞、多肽等大健康产品,覆盖多个领域,工厂可瞄准中药研发合作机会,数字化生产提升竞争力。

3. 电商启示:事件源于电商推广,推进数字化需透明化生产流程,如九芝堂探索药食同源,工厂可借此开发创新产品。

4. 风险规避:参保人数零显示管理漏洞,工厂应强化内部监管,学习九芝堂回应中加强审核的要点,确保合作安全。

行业趋势指向质量管控痛点,服务商可提供新技术解决方案。

1. 发展趋势:中药行业“强者恒强”,但九芝堂和同仁堂授权模式频发造假事件,显示质量失控行业问题,数字化需求上升。

2. 客户痛点:生产方资质缺失和虚假宣传暴露监管漏洞,核心是需要构建穿透式质量体系,九芝堂案例提示内容抽检重要性。

3. 解决方案:九芝堂提议加强日常监管和培训,服务商可开发工具支持资质审核和广告监控,如电商平台推广中的真实性检测技术。

4. 新动向数据:九芝堂研发投入增加,短期利润下降,但转向大健康领域提供合作机遇,服务商应聚焦供应链整合解决方案。

电商平台需强化授权产品管理和风险控制,以应对虚假宣传问题。

1. 需求和问题:短剧及平台推广中虚假内容如“养肝护肝”宣传,暴露平台内容审核不足,商业需求转向可信赖产品上架。

2. 平台最新做法:九芝堂将加强广告内容抽检,平台可结合此机制监控主播宣传,设置招商规则筛选资质合格品牌商。

3. 运营管理要点:事件涉及生产方失信记录,平台需导入风险规避系统,检查委托生产商背景,避免卷入类似九芝堂子公司的负面事件。

4. 风向规避:同仁堂授权产品造假案例显示行业风险高,平台应建立日常巡查制度,确保合规运营,守护用户信任。

品牌授权模式引发产业新问题,研究需聚焦政策建议和商业模式革新。

1. 新动向:老字号如九芝堂收入超2万亿元,但2022-2025年数据下滑至23.71亿元,归母净利润降至2.16亿元,显示战略转向“中药+干细胞+大健康”多元布局带来的短期挑战。

2. 新问题:授权模式下质量管控缺失,九芝堂和同仁堂案例均出现虚假宣传和生产资质违规,折射出商业化加速中信誉危机。

3. 政策法规建议:需要构建穿透式、强约束的监管体系,九芝堂回应提示加强法律法规培训,可作为政策启示避免授权滥用。

4. 商业模式分析:事件揭示掘金模式风险高,研究者应探讨如何平衡品牌授权与质量保证,确保老字号可持续发展。

返回默认

声明:快读内容全程由AI生成,请注意甄别信息。如您发现问题,请发送邮件至 run@ebrun.com 。

我是 品牌商 卖家 工厂 服务商 平台商 研究者 帮我再读一遍。

Quick Summary

Jiuzhitang's Taikang Tea has been exposed for false advertising and production qualification issues, consumers should be wary of product claims and origins.

1. False Advertising Details: The product was promoted on short dramas and e-commerce platforms with claims of 'nourishing and protecting the liver', but its national filing only permits claims of 'regulating cellular immunity' and 'providing some protection against chemical liver damage'. Hepatologists point out the latter is an experimental conclusion, not a function understood in everyday terms.

2. Producer Risks: The contracted manufacturer, Xi'an Jinzheng Fenggang Healthcare Products Co., has a record of dishonesty and zero employees enrolled in social insurance, highlighting the need to verify manufacturer backgrounds when choosing products.

3. Practical Advice: Jiuzhitang has responded by pledging to strengthen review processes and training. Consumers should rely on official filing information, avoid believing exaggerated claims by influencers, and focus on the product's actual efficacy.

Brand licensing models in commercialization can easily lead to false advertising and quality risks, necessitating stronger controls to protect brand reputation.

1. Brand Marketing Challenges: The Taikang Tea incident involving a Jiuzhitang subsidiary damages brand image, following a previous record of product nutrient content not matching labels, revealing vulnerabilities in licensing management.

2. Consumer Trend Observation: User behavior increasingly prioritizes authenticity; the false 'liver protection' claims expose a mismatch with consumer needs, indicating brand channel development should be more transparent.

3. Price Competition & R&D Insights: While Jiuzhitang's strategy pivots to 'Traditional Chinese Medicine + Stem Cells + Big Health', short-term profits have declined. Licensing models, as seen in Tongrentang's case, have also faced造假 incidents, highlighting the need to strengthen product development and ad review to prevent quality sacrifices for price wars.

4. Countermeasures: Jiuzhitang plans to enhance daily supervision and advertising spot checks, a strategy other brands can借鉴 to build a trustworthy licensing ecosystem.

Supply chain risks and policy compliance are key focuses; the incident highlights opportunities for sellers to seize while mitigating negative impacts.

1. Policy Interpretation & Risks: The manufacturer's lack of qualifications and zero social insurance enrollees led to product issues. Cases publicized by the State Administration for Market Regulation underscore the need to adhere to official standards and avoid legal disputes.

2. Growth Opportunities: Jiuzhitang, a time-honored brand with over 2 trillion RMB in historical revenue, has seen recent declines. The industry is diverging due to centralized procurement and demand adjustments; sellers can focus on compliant products, such as new layouts in the big health sector.

3. Incident Response Measures: The general distributor of Jiuzhitang's subsidiary has a history of non-compliance records. Sellers should learn from its approach to strengthen qualification audits and spot checks, utilizing partnerships to enhance supply chain resilience.

4. Risk Warning: False advertising easily triggers consumer disputes; caution is needed in e-commerce promotions. A positive opportunity lies in building trustworthy channels, with supportive policies like training helping to mitigate risks.

Production qualification issues and e-commerce collaborations offer lessons and opportunities, pushing factories towards greater compliance.

1. Production Demand Warning: The contracted manufacturer, Xi'an Jinzheng Fenggang Healthcare Products Co., lacked proper qualifications and had a dishonesty record, exposing production risks. Factories must ensure their own qualifications are complete to avoid similar penalties.

2. Business Opportunities: Jiuzhitang's business expansion into stem cells, polypeptides, and other big health products covers multiple areas. Factories can target collaboration opportunities in TCM R&D, enhancing competitiveness through digital production.

3. E-commerce Insights: The incident originated from e-commerce promotions. Advancing digitalization requires transparent production processes. Jiuzhitang's exploration of 'medicine and food同源' offers a model for factories to develop innovative products.

4. Risk Avoidance: Zero social insurance enrollees indicate management loopholes. Factories should strengthen internal oversight, learning from Jiuzhitang's response points about enhanced auditing to ensure partnership safety.

Industry trends point to quality control pain points, presenting opportunities for service providers to offer new technological solutions.

1. Development Trends: The TCM industry exhibits a 'strong get stronger' dynamic, but licensing models at Jiuzhitang and Tongrentang have frequently led to造假 incidents, revealing industry-wide quality control failures and rising demand for digitalization.

2. Customer Pain Points: Missing manufacturer qualifications and false advertising expose regulatory gaps. The core need is building an end-to-end quality system; the Jiuzhitang case highlights the importance of content spot checks.

3. Solutions: Jiuzhitang's proposal to strengthen daily supervision and training suggests a market for tools that support qualification audits and advertising monitoring, such as authenticity verification technologies for e-commerce promotions.

4. New Developments Data: While Jiuzhitang's R&D investment is increasing, short-term profits are down. Its pivot to the big health sector offers collaboration opportunities; service providers should focus on supply chain integration solutions.

E-commerce platforms need to strengthen management of licensed products and risk control to address false advertising issues.

1. Demand and Problems: False content in promotions via short dramas and platforms, like 'liver protection' claims, exposes insufficient platform content review. Commercial demand is shifting towards listing trustworthy products.

2. Platform's Latest Practices: Jiuzhitang plans to strengthen spot checks on advertising content. Platforms can integrate this mechanism to monitor influencer claims and establish merchant onboarding rules to filter for qualified brands.

3. Operational Management Points: The incident involves the manufacturer's dishonesty record. Platforms need to implement risk avoidance systems that check contracted manufacturers' backgrounds to avoid being implicated in negative events like those involving Jiuzhitang's subsidiary.

4. Trend Avoidance:造假 cases with Tongrentang licensed products indicate high industry risk. Platforms should establish daily inspection systems to ensure compliant operations and safeguard user trust.

Brand licensing models are triggering new industrial problems, requiring research to focus on policy recommendations and business model innovation.

1. New Developments: Time-honored brands like Jiuzhitang have historical revenue exceeding 2 trillion RMB, but data from 2022-2025 shows a decline to 2.371 billion RMB, with net profit attributable to shareholders dropping to 216 million RMB, indicating short-term challenges from its strategic shift to a diversified 'TCM + Stem Cells + Big Health' layout.

2. New Problems: Quality control is lacking under licensing models. Cases involving Jiuzhitang and Tongrentang both feature false advertising and production qualification violations, reflecting a credibility crisis amid accelerated commercialization.

3. Policy and Regulation Recommendations: There is a need to build a穿透式, strongly constrained regulatory system. Jiuzhitang's response, highlighting enhanced legal and regulatory training, offers policy启示 for preventing licensing abuse.

4. Business Model Analysis: The incident reveals the high risks of certain 'gold rush' models. Researchers should explore how to balance brand licensing with quality assurance to ensure the sustainable development of time-honored brands.

Disclaimer: The "Quick Summary" content is entirely generated by AI. Please exercise discretion when interpreting the information. For issues or corrections, please email run@ebrun.com .

I am a Brand Seller Factory Service Provider Marketplace Seller Researcher Read it again.

【亿邦原创】1月23日消息,据新华社旗下南都N视频发布调查报道,对老字号品牌九芝堂旗下的一款“泰康茶”产品及其品牌授权模式提出疑问。

报道指出,该产品在短剧及电商平台推广时,主播宣传其具有“养肝护肝”等功效。但国家市场监督管理总局备案显示,该产品获批的保健功能仅为“调节细胞免疫”和“对化学性肝损伤有一定保护作用”。有肝病学科医生指出,后者是一个有严格限定的实验性结论,不同于日常生活中消费者理解的广义“养肝”。

该产品的委托生产单位为“西安今正枫岗保健品有限责任公司”。公开信息显示,该公司曾于2019年被法院列为失信被执行人,且近年的工商年报参保人数为0。

该产品的总经销为九芝堂股份有限公司的全资子公司“湖南九芝堂健康产业有限公司”。报道提及,该子公司此前委托生产的其他产品,曾因营养成分含量与标签标示不符被市场监管总局通告;其另一合作生产商也有过产品抽检不合格记录。

针对报道提及的供应链与授权管理问题,九芝堂股份有限公司董事会办公室回应称,公司对合作方在资质审核、产品开发、广告宣传等方面均有规定,后续将加强法律法规培训、日常监管和广告内容抽检,确保运营合规。

作为拥有“中华老字号”称号的企业,九芝堂的品牌授权管理模式,受到市场关注。据悉,所谓品牌授权,是指品牌所有者通过协议,允许被授权方在特定商品或服务上使用其品牌商标、字号等无形资产。同样为老字号的同仁堂也广泛采用这种模式。

老字号是我国工商业发展历史中孕育的“金字招牌”。商务部最新数据显示,2024年,中华老字号企业合计实现营业收入超2万亿元。九芝堂历史悠久,其传统中药文化被列入国家级非物质文化遗产保护目录。业内有“北有同仁堂,南有九芝堂”的说法。

公开资料显示,九芝堂以中药研发、生产和销售等业务为核心,逐步探索布局干细胞、中医医疗健康服务、药食同源系列大健康产品等创新业务。现已发展成为下辖23家子公司,集科研、生产、销售、健康管理于一体的现代大型医药企业。公司拥有“九芝堂”“友搏”两个商标。品类覆盖心脑血管、补肾、补血、妇儿、五官科等各个领域。除了原有业务以外,九芝堂如今也大力布局多肽赛道。

根据财报,2022年至2024年,九芝堂公司分别实现营业收入为30.33亿元、29.61亿元、23.71亿元,其归属母公司股东的净利润分别为3.58亿元、2.97亿元、2.16亿元。九芝堂2025年前三季度营业收入为16.27亿元,同比下降21.13%;归母净利润1.52亿元,同比下降36.94%;扣非净利润1.31亿元,同比下降39.62%。

九芝堂表示,第三季度,公司营业收入下降、期间费用率上升、投资收益减少,致使净利下降。

行业人士认为,一方面是行业大环境分化:2025年中药行业呈现“强者恒强”格局,同仁堂、片仔演等同行也出现业绩下滑,核心原因是中成药集采持续推进、终端需求结构调整,部分老品种销售进入调整期,另一方面是公司自身战略调整: 正在从传统中药制造向“中药+干细胞+大健康”多元布局,研发和新业务投入增加,短期拖累了利润。

品牌授权模式下,类似事件频发。例如,2025年底,一款标称“北京同仁堂99%高纯南极磷虾油”的产品,被上海市消保委检测出其核心成分磷脂含量实际为零,涉嫌严重造假。该产品,正是由集团旗下的授权第三方企业贴牌生产。

业内人士指出,此次事件折射出,当老字号借由品牌授权模式加速商业化变现时,如何构建一套穿透式、强约束的质量与信誉管控体系,已成为关乎其金字招牌能否穿越周期的核心命题。

亿邦持续追踪报道该情报,如想了解更多与本文相关信息,请扫码关注作者微信。

文章来源:亿邦动力

广告
微信
朋友圈

这么好看,分享一下?

朋友圈 分享

APP内打开

+1
+1
微信好友 朋友圈 新浪微博 QQ空间
关闭
收藏成功
发送
/140 0