广告
加载中

茅台跌破1700元 年轻人愿意喝了吗?

美玲 2025/11/05 08:30
美玲 2025/11/05 08:30

邦小白快读

EN
全文速览

茅台酒批发价格跌破1700元,行业面临挑战,年轻人消费习惯改变带来机会与风险。

1.价格变化:53度飞天茅台散瓶批发价跌破1700元/瓶,原箱降至1700元;较年初跌23%,终端零售价有时低于批发价形成价格倒挂,导致市场观望情绪加剧。

2.消费趋势:年轻人更注重风味、舒适度和饮用体验,白酒从应酬场景向日常饮品转型;但白酒口感难入口,成为消费障碍。

3.行业影响:高端白酒价格整体缩水,库存超1亿瓶引发供需失衡;行业集中度提高,规模以上酒企减少超100家,多企业利润下滑。

4.茅台应对:公司回购53亿股份,调整渠道如暂停企业申购政策、取消大箱投放;经销商联合限制供货并罚低价销售,努力维持1800元以上价但效果有限。

5.机会提示:双11促销可能带来低价购酒机会;企业转型提示关注创新产品开发。

消费代际变迁要求品牌调整策略,茅台价格下跌揭示营销与产品的脱节。

1.消费趋势与用户行为:Z世代偏好风味、舒适度,白酒悦人属性(社交送礼)需转向悦己属性(个人饮用);未来机会在融合送礼、收藏、悦己等多功能。

2.品牌定价和价格竞争:茅台批价跌破目标1800元,终端倒挂成常态;风险在价格波动影响品牌定位,提示稳健定价模型。

3.产品研发和品牌营销:年轻人反感过度营销(如年份概念),需创新口感降低度数;詹军豪建议平衡产品力(核心品质)与营销力(故事共鸣),借鉴威士忌、清酒国际经验。

4.渠道建设和机会:消费习惯变化提示开发低度酒类;茅台渠道调整案例可学,如电商促销影响品牌曝光。

当前环境提供风险预警和增长机会,茅台事件推动渠道策略优化。

1.政策解读和应对措施:禁酒令导致高端酒需求萎缩,茅台取消开箱政策;卖家需调整库存策略避免积压。

2.消费需求变化和机会:年轻人转向口味舒适酒类,提示开发悦己新品;事件如双11平台补贴带来销售机会,可借机促销。

3.风险提示和负面影响:价格倒挂覆盖60%酒企,观望情绪形成越跌越不买循环;茅台经销商罚低价至停货,风险在信心不足和库存过高。

4.可学习点和合作方式:茅台回购股份和经销商联合稳价案例;增长市场在电商渠道合作,学习精准营销模式应对挑战。

5.扶持政策和机会提示:茅台配额挂钩考核,卖家可借政策优化运营;提示关注低度酒新兴需求。

生产需响应消费变迁,电商化为工艺改进提供启示。

1.产品生产和设计需求:年轻人偏好风味和舒适度,现有白酒口感难接受;提示创新工艺降低酒精度,开发悦己型低度产品。

2.商业机会:行业缺口在未满足年轻消费者,可探索日常饮用功能;茅台案例显示市场需求转向,工厂可研发新包装和口味。

3.推进数字化和电商启示:电商平台促销导致价格波动,茅台曾用电商引流;工厂可学在线营销策略,如精准投放减少库存压力。

4.机会扩展:国际酒类对比提示聚焦本质;机会在结合数字化工具优化供应链。

行业调整期凸显客户痛点,茅台案例提供解决方案参考。

1.行业发展趋势:白酒行业处于供给出清阶段,集中度提高;价格承压持续,供需失衡成痛点。

2.客户痛点:价格倒挂、经销商信心不足、库存高企;营销与产品脱节,年轻人不接受口味。

3.解决方案和新技术:茅台回购和渠道调整案例可推;服务商可提供数据分析工具解决库存问题,建议平衡产品力为核心的创新方案。

4.新动向:消费场景迁移提示开发优化服务;结合行业报告数据分析供需。

电商平台面临波动风险,茅台渠道策略提供运营启示。

1.商业对平台的需求和问题:经销商联合限制向电商供货;平台需应对价格倒挂风险,避免低价抛售影响利润。

2.平台的最新做法:茅台取消大箱投放等政策;电商促销如双11补贴导致零售价低于批发价,平台需优化库存管理。

3.招商和运营管理:当前茅台事件提示平台吸引新品牌(如低度酒);招商可聚焦合作伙伴的风险规避策略。

4.风险规避:库存积压和观望情绪严重;建议实施动态定价和严格供货审核,学茅台考核机制。

产业深层问题突出,茅台案例提供政策与模式启示。

1.产业新动向和新问题:代际变迁推动消费逻辑转型,白酒需求萎缩;价格倒挂常态化,供需失衡(库存超1亿瓶)成关键问题。

2.政策法规建议和启示:茅台稳价政策(如回购、渠道罚则)失效,提示需市场调节结合宏观调控;禁酒令影响需求,建议政策扶持创新。

3.商业模式和启示:营销与产品脱节;国际比较(威士忌、清酒)启示回归本质,建议发展多属性(悦己、收藏)模式。

4.案例研究:茅台业绩放缓(三季度营收微增0.56%);行业报告显示集中度提高,研究可聚焦结构改革路径。

返回默认

声明:快读内容全程由AI生成,请注意甄别信息。如您发现问题,请发送邮件至 run@ebrun.com 。

我是 品牌商 卖家 工厂 服务商 平台商 研究者 帮我再读一遍。

Quick Summary

Moutai's wholesale price has fallen below 1,700 yuan, posing challenges for the industry, while changing consumption habits among younger generations present both risks and opportunities.

1. Price Changes: The wholesale price of 53-degree Feitian Moutai in single bottles has dropped below 1,700 yuan per bottle, with original cases falling to 1,700 yuan. This represents a 23% decline since the start of the year. Retail prices sometimes fall below wholesale levels, creating price inversions and intensifying market caution.

2. Consumption Trends: Younger consumers prioritize flavor, comfort, and drinking experience, shifting baijiu from a social lubricant to a daily beverage. However, baijiu's harsh taste remains a barrier to consumption.

3. Industry Impact: Premium baijiu prices are declining overall, with inventory exceeding 100 million bottles causing supply-demand imbalances. Industry concentration is increasing, with over 100 major distilleries exiting the market and many companies reporting profit declines.

4. Moutai's Response: The company repurchased 5.3 billion yuan in shares and adjusted channels by suspending corporate purchase policies and canceling bulk case distribution. Dealers jointly restricted supply and penalized low-price sales, but efforts to maintain prices above 1,800 yuan have shown limited effectiveness.

5. Opportunities: Double 11 promotions may offer low-price purchasing opportunities; industry transformation highlights the need for innovative product development.

Generational consumption shifts require brand strategy adjustments, with Moutai's price decline revealing disconnects between marketing and product offerings.

1. Consumer Trends and User Behavior: Gen Z prefers flavor and comfort, necessitating a shift from baijiu's social gifting function to personal enjoyment. Future opportunities lie in integrating gifting, collecting, and personal consumption functionalities.

2. Brand Pricing and Competition: Moutai's wholesale price falling below the 1,800 yuan target, with frequent retail price inversions, highlights risks of price volatility affecting brand positioning and underscores the need for stable pricing models.

3. Product Development and Marketing: Younger consumers reject excessive marketing (e.g., vintage concepts), requiring taste innovation and lower alcohol content. Zhan Junhao advises balancing product strength (core quality) with marketing appeal (story resonance), learning from international whiskey and sake experiences.

4. Channel Development: Changing habits suggest developing low-alcohol categories; Moutai's channel adjustments offer lessons, particularly regarding e-commerce promotions' impact on brand exposure.

Current conditions provide both risk warnings and growth opportunities, with Moutai's situation driving channel strategy optimization.

1. Policy Interpretation: Alcohol restrictions have reduced premium baijiu demand, prompting Moutai to cancel case-opening policies. Sellers must adjust inventory strategies to avoid overstocking.

2. Demand Shifts: Younger consumers' preference for comfortable flavors suggests developing self-enjoyment products. Events like Double 11 with platform subsidies create sales opportunities for promotional activities.

3. Risks: Price inversions affect 60% of distilleries, creating a cycle of declining purchases amid falling prices. Moutai dealers penalize low-price sales to the point of supply suspension, risking confidence loss and high inventory.

4. Lessons: Moutai's share buybacks and dealer price stabilization efforts offer case studies; growth markets lie in e-commerce partnerships and precision marketing models.

5. Support Policies: Moutai links quotas to assessments, enabling sellers to optimize operations; emerging demand for low-alcohol products warrants attention.

Production must adapt to consumption shifts, with e-commerce trends informing process improvements.

1. Product Needs: Younger consumers prefer flavor and comfort, finding traditional baijiu taste unacceptable. This signals need for innovative processes to reduce alcohol content and develop low-alcohol self-enjoyment products.

2. Business Opportunities: The industry gap lies in unmet young consumer demand, suggesting exploration of daily drinking functions. Moutai's case shows market shifts toward new packaging and flavors.

3. Digitalization: E-commerce promotions cause price fluctuations, with Moutai using online platforms for traffic generation. Factories can learn online marketing strategies like targeted campaigns to reduce inventory pressure.

4. Expansion: International liquor comparisons highlight focusing on product essence; opportunities exist in using digital tools to optimize supply chains.

Industry adjustments highlight client pain points, with Moutai's case offering solution references.

1. Industry Trends: Baijiu sector is in a supply clearance phase with increasing concentration; price pressures persist amid supply-demand imbalances.

2. Client Pain Points: Price inversions, dealer confidence issues, high inventory; marketing-product disconnects and youth taste rejection.

3. Solutions: Moutai's buybacks and channel adjustments provide implementable cases; service providers can offer data analytics tools for inventory management, recommending innovation centered on product strength.

4. New Developments: Consumption scene migration suggests service optimization opportunities; industry report data analysis can address supply-demand issues.

E-commerce platforms face volatility risks, with Moutai's channel strategies offering operational insights.

1. Platform Challenges: Dealers jointly restrict e-commerce supply; platforms must manage price inversion risks to avoid profit erosion from low-price sales.

2. Platform Responses: Moutai's policy changes like canceling bulk case distribution; e-commerce promotions (e.g., Double 11 subsidies) causing retail prices below wholesale levels necessitate optimized inventory management.

3. Merchant Management: Moutai's situation suggests attracting new brands (e.g., low-alcohol products); partnerships should focus on risk avoidance strategies.

4. Risk Mitigation: Severe inventory buildup and consumer caution require dynamic pricing and strict supply audits, learning from Moutai's assessment mechanisms.

Industry structural issues are prominent, with Moutai's case offering policy and model insights.

1. Industry Dynamics: Generational shifts drive consumption logic transformation, reducing baijiu demand; price inversions become normalized amid supply-demand imbalances (100+ million bottle inventory).

2. Policy Implications: Moutai's price stabilization measures (buybacks, channel penalties) proving ineffective suggest need for market mechanisms with macro-control; alcohol restrictions impact demand, recommending innovation support policies.

3. Business Models: Marketing-product disconnects; international comparisons (whiskey, sake) suggest returning to product essence, developing multi-attribute models (self-enjoyment, collecting).

4. Case Study: Moutai's slowed growth (0.56% Q3 revenue increase); industry reports show concentration increases, suggesting research focus on structural reform paths.

Disclaimer: The "Quick Summary" content is entirely generated by AI. Please exercise discretion when interpreting the information. For issues or corrections, please email run@ebrun.com .

I am a Brand Seller Factory Service Provider Marketplace Seller Researcher Read it again.

茅台人事动荡之际,飞天茅台价格再下跌。

据“今日酒价”数据显示,53度500ml装2025年款飞天茅台散瓶的批发参考价已经跌破1700元/瓶大关,再创上市以来的新低;同期原箱报价也回落至1700元关口。

此前,茅台曾力图将飞天茅台的批发价稳定在1800元以上。然而从实际表现看,这一价格关口并未守住。在行业人士看来,飞天茅台失守,更关键的是对高端白酒整体板块形成冲击。当前市场来看,多款头部大单品终端价低于出厂价,价格倒挂已成常态。

茅台,曾经牵动无数年轻人的心和手,电商平台一度拿飞天茅台做引流工具,很多年轻人甚至靠抢茅台为生,现在茅台已经从高不可攀的3000元,下探到接近零售价的地步,年轻人现在愿意喝茅台了吗?

与此同时,我们可以看见,越来越多的白酒厂商,开始集体推出低度化的产品。

年轻人为何不买单?

茅台批价跌破1700元,不仅是一次价格回调,更折射出白酒行业在代际变迁中所面临的深层挑战。

随着年轻一代逐渐成为消费主力,白酒的消费逻辑正在发生根本性变化。过去,酒精度数常被视作品质高低的象征,如今Z世代更关注的是风味、舒适度和饮用体验,白酒消费场景正逐步从“应酬标配”向“日常饮品”转型。

然而,“白酒不好喝”是横亘在年轻消费者面前的一道高墙。针对这一现状,资深行业观察人士杨飞指出,当前白酒行业的核心矛盾在于消费场景的迁移与产品迭代滞后之间的脱节。白酒在口味上未能赢得年轻消费者的广泛认同,产品形态也长期缺乏有效创新,这一结构性困境亟待扭转。

他进一步从国际比较的视角提出反思:对比威士忌对时间积淀的坚持、清酒对工艺传承的尊重,国际酒类的发展路径始终围绕产品本质展开。反观中国白酒,是否过度聚焦于“20年陈酿”“30年窖藏”等营销概念,而忽略了产品本身的价值提升?白酒行业是时候回归对品质与创新的根本尊重。

这一反思自然引出一个根本性质疑:从工艺角度看,白酒的酿造成本与其市场售价之间是否存在合理对应关系?当茅台价格失守,整个行业都应当集体反思:这些年来,白酒企业究竟是在用心做产品,还是在用概念做营销?

针对产品与营销的平衡问题,詹军豪则指出,产品力与营销力缺一不可,产品力是根基,营销力是放大器,部分白酒企业虽靠营销在短期内吸引眼球,但长期缺乏产品力支撑的品牌难以持续。企业应在二者之间取得平衡,以产品力为核心,不断提升品质、创新口感,同时辅以精准营销,讲述真实、有共鸣的品牌故事,从而增强品牌吸引力。

中国食品产业分析师朱丹蓬向酒周志分析指出,从消费属性来看,中国白酒更多承载社交礼赠与商务应酬功能,具备较强的“悦人”属性;而威士忌、清酒等国酒主流酒类则更倾向于个人小酌与微醺体验,注重满足饮用者自身的情绪价值,呈现出鲜明的“悦己”导向。

“未来,中国白酒若能切换不同场景,兼具收藏、送礼、应酬及悦己等多重属性,将更为全面,以更好地适配未来市场。”

看不到何时止跌

今年以来,以飞天茅台为代表的茅台酒价格持续下行,与年初相比,其批发价累计跌幅已接近23%。回顾价格走势,春节期间,飞天茅台市场价尚能维持在2290元,此后便开启下跌模式,至9月初,其行情价已跌破1800元。

值得关注的是,十月中旬起,伴随各大电商平台大促活动启动,部分渠道中53度飞天茅台经补贴后价格已低于1700元/瓶,出现终端零售价低于批发价的阶段性“价格倒挂”现象。

在这一背景下,渠道端心态趋于谨慎。酒商王先生透露,尽管市场上出现低于1700元/瓶的批价,但实际零售成交多维持在2000元左右。他指出,飞天茅台下跌不仅没有激发市场需求,反而加剧了市场的观望情绪,形成“越跌越不买”的负向循环。

对于本轮价格调整的动因,不少业内人士将其与茅台管理层更迭相联系,认为“换帅”所带来的信心波动与政策不确定性,进一步影响了市场对价格的预期。

有倒爷表示目前烟酒店铺进货意愿低迷,多采取“到货即出”策略,不敢囤货,并普遍预期价格仍将下行。随着“双11”临近,市场甚至出现“原价买茅台不是梦”的论调。

市场体感与券商机构相互印证。多家研究机构指出,白酒行业整体仍处于调整周期。太平洋证券分析称,行业正处于“供给出清”的筑底阶段,三季报业绩压力有望加速尾部企业退出。

价格持续承压的背后,是贵州茅台自身增长动能的放缓。最新披露的三季度财报显示,今年第三季度单季,贵州茅台实现营业收入390.64亿元,同比仅微增0.56%;归母净利润为192.24亿元,同比微幅增长0.48%。

受第三季度业绩整体放缓的拖累,今年前三季度,茅台累计实现营业总收入1309.04亿元,同比增长6.32%;归母净利润646.26亿元,同比增长6.25%。

同时,被视为酒企业绩“蓄水池”的合同负债指标出现收缩。三季度公司合同负债为77.49亿,较年初的95.92亿下滑了近20%,比2024年同期的99.3亿,下降了22%,这在一定程度上反映出经销商打款意愿减弱。

从行业视角看,茅台价格松动产生了更广泛的连锁反应。白酒KOL酒仙张表示,飞天茅台价格下跌实际对消费者的影响不大,到手价便宜了,但规格依然最高,面子属性没有受到影响。茅台下跌实际影响最大的是经销商,更重要的是引发了高端白酒价格的整体缩水。

《2025中国白酒市场中期研究报告》指出,价格倒挂现象已覆盖60%的白酒企业,59.7%的酒企营业利润减少,行业供需失衡与渠道压力加剧。截至2025年上半年,规模以上白酒企业数量缩减至887家,同比减少超100家,行业集中度进一步提升。

控价基本失灵

为应对飞天茅台价格持续下行的压力,茅台在过去一年多来陆续推出一系列稳价举措。

首先,公司上市23年来首次开展注销式回购。截至2025年7月底,茅台累计回购股份345.17万股,占总股本0.2748%,支付总金额达53亿元。

其次,公司在产品投放与渠道政策方面作出多项调整,包括暂停多地推行的“企业申购1499元飞天”政策、取消12瓶大箱飞天投放及开箱政策、叫停巽风375ml茅台酒的合成行权等等。

值得一提的是,面对飞天茅台价格下跌,茅台经销商们也尝试联合稳价。今年6月,部分省区茅台经销商联谊会达成共识,限制向电商平台、批发市场及省外渠道供货,并加强市场巡查力度。

针对低价抛售行为,多地实施严格管控。例如,对以低于2000元价格销售的经销商,采取停货乃至取消合同等处罚。河南省区更明确规定,对回收价低于2100元/瓶的行为,首次违规将加价500元回购,第二次停货三个月,第三次取消合同。此外,价格执行情况被纳入经销商考核体系,与配额直接挂钩,以强化渠道自律。

在稳价举措不断推进的过程中,今年9月,茅台集团总经理王莉在华东调研期间,与机构投资者举办了一场小范围交流会。会上她明确,公司将努力把飞天茅台批发价维持在1800元以上,着重强调量价平衡。

不过,在宏观经济周期、行业调整周期与企业自身转型“三期叠加”的背景下,上述举措未能扭转整体价格走势。

“茅台批价跌破1700元,既受短期市场情绪影响,也折射出白酒行业深层次的供需矛盾”,战略定位专家、福建华策品牌定位咨询创始人詹军豪分析指出,一是政策收紧导致公务消费市场萎缩,“新禁酒令”使得高端团购场景动销大幅下滑;二是宏观经济增速放缓,企业控制成本,商务宴请需求减弱;此外,社会库存高企,预计超过1亿瓶,导致供需关系严重失衡。

值得关注的是,在茅台批价首次跌破1700元的同一天上午,茅台集团新任党委书记、董事长陈华在2025赤水河论坛上完成其履职后的“首秀”。尽管这是其进入茅台体系后的首次公开致辞,但演讲内容未涉及企业经营相关议题。

当前,产品价格波动下行、经销商与市场信心不足等问题,仍是贵州茅台必须面对的核心挑战。在新任董事长陈华的带领下,贵州茅台能否成功穿越行业周期,市场仍存疑虑。

注:文/美玲,文章来源:酒周志,本文为作者独立观点,不代表亿邦动力立场。

文章来源:酒周志

广告
微信
朋友圈

这么好看,分享一下?

朋友圈 分享

APP内打开

+1
+1
微信好友 朋友圈 新浪微博 QQ空间
关闭
收藏成功
发送
/140 0