广告
加载中

京东外卖:要对标快驴了

六哥JOJO 2025/10/29 13:54
六哥JOJO 2025/10/29 13:54

邦小白快读

EN
全文速览

京东外卖正在变革策略,从传统外卖平台转向对标快驴做餐饮B2B,为商家供货以重塑竞争力。

1.京东外卖当前市场份额仅1000万单,补贴减少且流量不稳,尤其在下沉区域单量锐减;转向菜品供给后,开发高性价比套餐(如鱼香肉丝+米饭+饮料27元),通过品质外卖打差异化。

2.面临阿里和美团夹击(如淘宝闪购用奶茶补贴拉单),京东被迫放弃大额补贴(需500亿以上),选择从供给端切入北京试点,以拉商家供给为核心。

3.B2B赛道复苏:京东入局推动食材配送领域竞争加剧,区域玩家增长受益于摆摊人群增多和消费理性化,如冻品配送频次提高。

京东外卖的策略转型聚焦品牌营销和消费趋势洞察,通过菜品创新强化品牌差异化。

1.品牌营销举措:京东开发自有菜品(如鱼香肉丝套餐20-27元),提供性价比组合(麻婆豆腐、地三鲜可切换),以品质外卖吸引用户,提升品牌形象;同时服务商反馈表明菜品测试提升了商家引流效果。

2.消费趋势响应:针对用户追求性价比和理性消费的趋势,京东菜品设计强调口感提升和价格优势,契合一二线核心城市用户需求;阿里和美团的高补贴模式反向凸显京东品质定位。

3.未来方向:从供给输出解决方案(如快餐菜品),京东计划通过供货商家深化品牌影响力,并在B2B赛道挖掘细分机会。

京东外卖的新商业模式为卖家提供增长机遇和政策应对启示,尤其在供给整合和机会捕捉方面。

1.机会提示:京东给商家供货(首选北京试点),输出高性价比菜品(如鱼香肉丝套餐),卖家可借此降低食材成本,打造差异化外卖商品;B2B配送赛道复苏,区域玩家受益于摆摊人群增加(冻品需求升)。

2.可学习点:借鉴京东的菜品开发方法(从自营外卖测试经验),卖家可优化菜品组合应对竞争;同时观察行业正面影响(如京东入局推动赛道活跃)。

3.风险提示:当前京东面临阿里美团夹击,卖家需注意市场不确定性(如单量不稳),但换打法后供给端切入可能提供稳定合作渠道。

京东外卖的转向为工厂带来产品生产和商业机会,重点在菜品输出和数字化趋势驱动。

1.产品需求:京东计划输出菜品解决方案(如快餐菜式),需工厂支持性价比食材生产(如冻品包子、鱼香肉丝原料),开发口感和价格优化的产品组合;案例有京东自有菜品测试(包菜、豆腐等原料)。

2.商业机会:B2B食材配送赛道增长(京东入局推动),冻品品类因摆摊人群暴增而频次提高(如早餐铺子和烧烤摊),工厂可抓住区域玩家壮大契机;美菜模式启示(输出系统而非重资产),工厂可学习轻量化合作。

3.数字化启示:京东试点北京基于自营经验,工厂可借鉴推进电商供应链路优化;赛道整体盈利(快驴和美菜赚钱),工厂合作潜力大。

行业发展趋势和客户痛点被京东入局激发,焦点在B2B配送的创新解决方案上。

1.行业趋势:餐饮食材B2B赛道复苏(资本退出后淡出视线),京东对标快驴入局;目前格局以快驴领先(盈利并开城)和美菜盈利(轻资产加盟输出系统),区域玩家受益消费理性化和摆摊增多(冻品配送频次提升)。

2.客户痛点:京东外卖供给和用户不足的痛点被放大(需两头飞轮补贴500亿以上),服务商反馈流量不稳和下沉区域单量锐减;但痛点转化为机会(如菜品解决方案输出)。

3.新技术和方案:京东试图用供给切入(开发自有菜品组合),服务商可围绕食材配送痛点提供整合方案;市场复苏案例(如早餐和烧烤冻品需求)显示潜在服务增长点。

京东外卖的最新做法和招商动向揭示对平台需求和运营管理的调整。

1.最新做法:平台换打法从供给端切入(给商家供货对标快驴),试点北京基于京东主站流量支撑,放弃大补贴策略;通过菜品输出(如鱼香肉丝套餐)提升品质外卖定位,招商对象转向餐饮商家供应合作。

2.平台需求和问题:需解决供给不足和用户飞轮问题(下沉区域流量缺),面临美团和阿里夹击(淘宝闪购高补贴堵路);风险规避方面,京东选择细分切入(避免大额补贴深坑)并从B2B赛道找机会。

3.运营管理:基于自营前置仓项目经验,京东优先北京试点以测控风险;招商重点在输出解决方案(帮商家降低成本)而非平台扩张。

产业新动向和商业模式变化由京东策略转型驱动,体现政策和市场启示。

1.产业动向:餐饮食材B2B赛道风起(京东入局搅局),当前快驴一骑绝尘(盈利开城)、美菜转向轻资产盈利、区域玩家壮大(因摆摊暴增和消费理性化),冻品品类频次提升带动配送行业复苏。

2.新商业模式:京东外卖从自营平台转型供给端切入(输出菜品和解决方案),商业模式创新在于通过供货商家拉供给,而非传统补贴驱动;此举暴露了行业停滞不前的问题(京东份额缩水)。

3.政策建议启示:京东案例显示在竞争压力下(阿里美团夹击),企业可避开风口(如奶茶旺季)选择细分机会;赛道足够大(多个玩家闷声发财),启示政策可支持B2B领域的数字化推进。

返回默认

声明:快读内容全程由AI生成,请注意甄别信息。如您发现问题,请发送邮件至 run@ebrun.com 。

我是 品牌商 卖家 工厂 服务商 平台商 研究者 帮我再读一遍。

Quick Summary

JD's food delivery service is pivoting from a traditional platform model to a B2B supplier model for restaurants, mirroring Kuailu's approach, in a bid to rebuild competitiveness.

1. With a current market share of only 10 million orders, reduced subsidies, and unstable traffic—especially significant order declines in lower-tier markets—JD is differentiating itself by focusing on quality meals. It now develops cost-effective meal sets (e.g., fish-flavored shredded pork with rice and a drink for 27 yuan) supplied directly to merchants.

2. Squeezed by Alibaba and Meituan (e.g., Taobao's flash sales using milk tea subsidies), JD is forced to abandon massive subsidies (which would require over 50 billion yuan). Instead, it's piloting in Beijing by prioritizing merchant supply acquisition.

3. The B2B sector is reviving: JD's entry intensifies competition in ingredient distribution. Regional players are benefiting from a surge in street vendors and more rational consumer spending, evidenced by increased delivery frequency for frozen goods.

JD's strategic shift focuses on brand marketing and consumer trend insights, using meal innovation to strengthen differentiation.

1. Brand marketing initiatives: JD is developing proprietary dishes (e.g., fish-flavored shredded pork meal sets priced 20-27 yuan) and offering versatile, cost-effective combinations (like mapo tofu or diced potatoes with green peppers) to attract users with quality, enhancing brand image. Service provider feedback indicates these meal tests improve merchant traffic.

2. Responding to trends: Catering to the demand for value and rational spending, JD's meal designs emphasize taste enhancement and price advantages, aligning with core users in first- and second-tier cities. The high-subsidy models of Alibaba and Meituan inadvertently highlight JD's quality positioning.

3. Future direction: By supplying solutions (e.g., pre-prepared fast-food dishes) to merchants, JD plans to deepen brand influence and explore niche opportunities within the B2B sector.

JD's new business model offers sellers growth opportunities and insights for navigating policies, particularly regarding supply integration and seizing opportunities.

1. Opportunity alert: JD is supplying merchants (initially piloting in Beijing) with cost-effective meal solutions (e.g., fish-flavored shredded pork sets). Sellers can leverage this to reduce ingredient costs and create differentiated offerings. The reviving B2B distribution sector benefits regional players due to increased street vending (boosting frozen goods demand).

2. Key takeaways: Sellers can learn from JD's meal development methods (based on its own delivery testing experience) to optimize combinations and compete effectively. Observing the industry's positive momentum (e.g., JD's entry energizing the sector) is also valuable.

3. Risk note: While JD faces pressure from Alibaba and Meituan, introducing market uncertainty (e.g., order volatility), its pivot to the supply side may eventually offer sellers more stable partnership channels.

JD's pivot presents product demand and commercial opportunities for factories, centered on meal output and digitalization trends.

1. Product demand: JD plans to supply meal solutions (e.g., fast-food dishes), requiring factory support for cost-effective ingredient production (e.g., frozen buns, fish-flavored shredded pork components) and developing combinations optimized for taste and price. Examples include JD's proprietary meal tests using ingredients like cabbage and tofu.

2. Commercial opportunity: The growing B2B ingredient distribution sector (accelerated by JD's entry) sees increased frequency for frozen goods due to a surge in street vendors (e.g., breakfast stalls, barbecue stands). Factories can capitalize on the growth of regional players. Learning from light-asset cooperation models, like Meicai's system-focused approach, is advisable.

3. Digital insight: JD's Beijing pilot leverages its self-operated experience; factories can learn from this to optimize their e-commerce supply chains. The sector's overall profitability (e.g., Kuailu, Meicai) indicates significant collaboration potential.

Industry trends and client pain points are highlighted by JD's entry, focusing on innovative B2B distribution solutions.

1. Industry trend: The restaurant ingredient B2B sector is reviving (after receding from investor focus), with JD entering to compete with Kuailu. The current landscape features Kuailu leading (profitable and expanding), Meicai profitable with a light-asset franchise model, and regional players benefiting from rationalized spending and more street vendors (increasing frozen goods delivery frequency).

2. Client pain points: JD's challenges—insufficient supply and users, requiring massive two-sided flywheel subsidies (over 50 billion yuan)—are amplified. Service provider feedback cites unstable traffic and sharp order declines in lower-tier markets. However, these pains create opportunities, such as providing meal solutions.

3. New solutions: JD's supply-side approach (developing proprietary meal combinations) allows service providers to offer integrated solutions addressing distribution pain points. Market revival cases (e.g., rising demand for breakfast and barbecue frozen goods) indicate potential service growth areas.

JD's latest moves and merchant recruitment shifts reveal adjustments in platform demands and operational management.

1. Latest strategy: The platform is pivoting to a supply-side model (supplying merchants, mirroring Kuailu), piloting in Beijing with support from JD's main site traffic and abandoning heavy subsidies. It aims to elevate its quality positioning through meal output (e.g., fish-flavored shredded pork sets), shifting merchant recruitment towards supply partnerships with restaurants.

2. Platform needs & issues: JD must address insufficient supply and user flywheel problems (lack of traffic in lower-tier markets) while competing with Meituan and Alibaba (e.g., Taobao's flash sales blocking the path with high subsidies). For risk aversion, JD is targeting niche opportunities (avoiding the subsidy trap) and seeking growth in the B2B sector.

3. Operational management: Leveraging experience from its self-operated warehouse projects, JD is prioritizing the Beijing pilot for risk control. The recruitment focus is on outputting solutions (helping merchants reduce costs) rather than platform expansion.

New industry movements and business model shifts, driven by JD's strategic pivot, offer policy and market insights.

1. Industry movement: The restaurant ingredient B2B sector is heating up (with JD's entry stirring competition). Kuailu currently leads (profitable and expanding cities), Meicai has pivoted to a profitable light-asset model, and regional players are growing (due to a surge in street vending and rationalized consumption), with increased frozen goods frequency driving distribution sector recovery.

2. New business model: JD is transforming from a self-operated platform to a supply-side player (outputting meals and solutions). The innovation lies in driving supply by provisioning merchants, moving away from traditional subsidy-driven models. This shift exposes industry stagnation issues (e.g., JD's shrinking market share).

3. Policy implications: JD's case shows that under competitive pressure (from Alibaba and Meituan), companies can avoid crowded battlegrounds (e.g., peak milk tea season) and target niche opportunities. The sector's large size (with multiple players profiting quietly) suggests policy could support digitalization advances in B2B.

Disclaimer: The "Quick Summary" content is entirely generated by AI. Please exercise discretion when interpreting the information. For issues or corrections, please email run@ebrun.com .

I am a Brand Seller Factory Service Provider Marketplace Seller Researcher Read it again.

1

新动作

开始了,要开始了,近日京东外卖核心人员都在密集前往北京,对标快驴做餐饮b2b,准备给商家供货,首站北京。

“我们也听说新项目了,也在做准备,就等着官宣。”京东外卖下面服务商反馈道:“之前京东外卖就已经尝试开发菜品让商家去打外卖战,开发菜品都极具性价比,比如鱼香肉丝+手撕包菜+软饮饮料+米饭,只需27块。另外还有鱼香肉丝+麻婆豆腐+苏打水+米饭,只需20,麻婆豆腐可以切换成地三鲜、土豆丝等,总之这些菜品就是很便宜。”

而这种从菜品切入,做品质外卖,打差异化,是京东外卖为数不多的方法了,“京东外卖现在补贴不多了,流量也不稳,市场份额也缩到1000w单左右,现在全靠京东主站流量支撑 ,而且都是一二线核心城市,偏下沉区域单量掉的一塌糊涂。”京东外卖服务商反馈道。

而情况确实如此,此时的京东外卖不仅腹背受敌,而且停滞不前,腹背受敌在于阿里和美团夹击,特别是淘宝闪购一鸣惊人,用奶茶拉消费频次,同时用高补贴拉单量,之后迅速发动人海战,快速拉商家供给,同时还把客单拉升,降低亏损,一招下来,堵死了京东外卖前进道路,要想反击,只能加大补贴,但转眼已过外卖旺季,奶茶、茶饮喝不了那么多,京东外卖失去了反击时机。

其次当前阶段的京东外卖,完全不同于淘宝闪购和美团外卖,其供给和用户都远远不够,这意味着京东外卖补贴要把两头飞轮转动起来,需要砸大量的钱,起码超500亿,特别是在于两头补,既补商家又补用户,补贴深不见底,而且不一定起效,特别在下沉用户,京东流量最缺地段,完全要靠下血本拉起来。

因此京东外卖只能另辟蹊径,从供给切入,从细分切入,做品质外卖,先给商家供货,以此慢慢把商家供给拉起来,放弃大补贴,快起量,用供给来切入,试图打造一个品质和性价比兼顾的外卖平台,京东外卖换打法了。

“首选北京,是因为京东所有新项目试点都会在北京,包括之前自营前置仓项目,还有现在的给商家供货项目,北京是京东大本营。”京东外卖内部人员透露道:“从供给上做突破口,京东还是想做供给。”

而此前京东外卖也做了诸多尝试,自己做外卖平台,自己又开外卖店,还想做咖啡,现在则给商家供货,兜兜转转,还是做回了供给。

“菜品,京东外卖之前测试过很多菜品,还有自己自营外卖做的菜品,都极具性价比。”京东外卖服务商反馈道:“之前用新菜品让商家引流,打差异化,还是有点效果。”

而随着京东外卖入局,本来不温不火的食材配送赛道又开始闹腾起来,这个赛道目前多数玩家处于闷声发财阶段,供应商也如此,大家埋头苦干,愣是一声不吭,局势微妙起来了。

2

B2B赛道

随着资本散去,餐饮食材配送赛道逐步淡出视线,但随着京东入场,情况一下子复杂起来,这个赛道快驴一骑绝尘,美菜闷头赚钱,其余区域玩家也越做越大,今年是特殊一年。

先说快驴,美团快驴在这个赛道一家独大,一是早已完成盈利,二是还在继续开城,三是有自家品牌,竞争对手不多,非常吃香,目前体量越做越大,核心品类在冻品上。

其次美菜,和快驴滚雪球越滚越大不同,美菜则是像秋天落叶的大树一样,加盟代理满天飞,只剩枯枝树干,但却盈利了,下面的加盟代理也活的不错。美菜避重就轻,只输出系统,bd培训等,生鲜不配,仓配不碰,此前还和预制菜厂家打成一片,帮预制菜工厂卖货,越做越轻,逐步赚钱,虽然体量越来越小,但利润逐步提高,虽不死,但却有利润。

而其余的区域玩家也在今年壮大起来,这得益于摆摊人数增加,以及消费理性化,特别是冻品品类,靠着摆摊人数暴涨而不断增长,特别是街头摆摊烧烤和街边早餐铺子,这类店铺增多,极大拉高配送频次,早上送早点,冻品包子,晚上送冻品烧烤,小摊小贩增多,拉高了配送公司销量和配送频次,行业一下子好了起来。

而对京东外卖而言,京东更想做的是菜品品类的输出,特别是快餐菜式而言,从口感到价格提升,输出的不仅是产品,还有解决方案,而且试图从供给端切入商家端,慢慢把餐饮供给拉起来。

3

风起

对京东而言,这个赛道还是有的做,里面还有众多细分可以切入,而对这个餐饮配送赛道而言,几年跌跌撞撞,转头细看,又要再起风云了,不过这个赛道足够大,很多人都在悄悄挣钱。

注:文/六哥JOJO,文章来源:六哥调研,本文为作者独立观点,不代表亿邦动力立场。

文章来源:六哥调研

广告
微信
朋友圈

这么好看,分享一下?

朋友圈 分享

APP内打开

+1
+1
微信好友 朋友圈 新浪微博 QQ空间
关闭
收藏成功
发送
/140 0